Topic: All Wars Are Bankers' Wars (Read 3815 times)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPje245vew4

Is it a good place to place the clip here?

 the constant warring that we suffer is caused by proffit, period.

they have replaced reverence for divine spirit (purposely, over time) with devotion to and worship for, cash and credit, the two headed god who rules all.


   

I would say that Religion and Oil have to do with most wars rather then religion and ethnicity.

The rulers really only care about religion but need oil to keep their war machine running.

It would be our problem.

Economically because Europe is a major trading partner with us.

Militarily because of our military presence there, the fact that most of Europe is our ally, because without Europe as our ally it would be very difficult for us to fight any war in that part of the world as we would have no place to stage a war (build up troops)

LOL.  Bankers cause wars?  Just this week.  Iraq & Ukraine.   Nothing to w banks.

Try religion & ethnicity.

The only one thats brainwashed is you

Money is definitely anti-war, just imagine a world without money. How do you convince people to follow you?work for you, or gain your fair share? without a tally system, things get awfully hairy. Though when people begin to tamper with the tally system(money), they tend to leverage things in their favor... throwing the entire system into imbalance; equilibrium is peace, chaos is war.

and for the bankers, no one benefits from war, it is merely a readjustment of accounts on a ledger. If your countries bank gets blown up, their accounts world wide are cleared... they become worthless. The country falls into debt rebuilding, the banks lending the money lose their money, reposes and are forced to sell at a loss because they do not manage companies, but in the end, if you can change the ledger you can erase the losses... re-adjusting the money supply and not the behavior, the winner wins by simply re-writing history.

Maybe Bitcoin's, strict rules will help... can't tamper with the ledger, if your stupid you will lose everything like everyone else, there is no winner, guaranteed and at the least it keeps conflicts to a local scope where return on War investments is guaranteed.

But then again when people want to fight, it's hard not to see it as an investment, ; it's hard not to invest on a sudden uptick in demand for war. It's easy to let greed overcome the logical conclusion that a little number represents the rate of re-armament... where can the morals be if all we see is growth on a chart, rather than potential death toll that we are catalyzing and investing in.

There can be many factors lead to conflict and war. Competing for natural resources is one among many.

Go back to study causation and logic before showing a fool of yourself.

Hy Mr.Joesixpack you know nothing about the real world, stop watching Discovery channel and dig more. Do you really think Hitler coud fund his war with only selling his ''Mein Kamph'' book? Money comes from banks not from a gumballmachine. Millions and millions of ppl has been wasted to make the bankers uber rich, war is for them the best way to make them very wealty, not only to borrow money for troops/weapons/defences but also rebuilding that destroyed country(s), and the loser need to lend money to repay all of that, it's a win-win for banks.

Now, for the first time in human history we have a tool named; Bitcoin, that allows uss to be really free and the best part is we wont need to fire a single shot to get rid of those retarted bankers. Problem is with ppl like you; 1. you have been brainwashed by tv and 2. we live for so long in this corrupt system that ppl take it for granted, it's started to get ''normal'' all these wars/hunger/slums. Bankers are to powerfull, i've never seen 1 banker went to jail after all those crimes.

We're not free we where never been free,(even after all those raged wars and human sacrifices)  Bitcoin coud do that job so feel privileged to live in this time and see the world transform into a better place.

So basicly, there was no war when there was no capitalism? You gotta be kidding us dude...really...

 because WE are able to keep our heads buried completely underground?

Let them take Europe, not really our problem.

We tried that in WW2 and as a result the Nazi's (and axis) were able to easily defeat most of Europe and was able to control most of the pacific. We got attacked even though we tried to stay neutral. 

Lots of lots of conspiracy theory.

Blaming the problems on everyone else but one self.

History Time!

No, every war is a Rothschild war.

During the last Napoleonic war, the one that he lost, the original Rothschild was able to get the "fake" news three days before the rest of Britain and "sold" the idea that Napoleon had won the war.  This tanked the stock market to which he was able to buy for pennies on the dollar.  Before the REAL news arrived, he was able to buy 97% of Britain's economy overnight.  It shown the difference that 3 days can do. 

He's known as a the man who bankrolled the world and has funded both sides of each and every war ever since.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqF-2C1JTyo

exactly....

That list is all of the major wars that the US has fought in.

In minor conflicts this does not happen, however a much smaller amount of resources is put into these smaller conflicts/wars.

When has that ever happened other than Iraq, Afghanistan, WW2, Korea, the US Civil war, and WW1? 

That was pretty interesting. Thanks for sharing.

Infrastructure is destroyed in wars so that the attacking countriy's companies can rebuild (assuming the attacking Country wins of course).

As an American I would love to see our government "neutered."  Our military should defend the homeland and that is it.

 All wars of the last century were fought for the benefit of massive profits, mostly for and by central bankers.

 Find out whom your not allowed to criticize. Only then do you know whom are your real masters.

 They lied to all of you. On purpose. They own you. At least many of you. Your their obedient worker slaves.

 Power, Control, Money.
Always follow the money honey.
After all, even every woman knows that much.
But most men are dimwitted it would seem.

 Hey, it's just reality. Don't get upset. Learn from it.

 And as WW3 heats up, know it was the failing Banksters whom triggered it.


 Bitcoin is sheer justice. Banksters hate Bitcoin.
And that's all the proof one needs to know a it's vastly superior store of value than fiat.

 Bankers? Their mostly an evil lot, and a lot of dimwits too.
Their known as 'the best & brightest' with the most costly failures in all history. Go figure.

That's why I and many other people in this community like Bitcoin so much.

A world in which Bitcoin is widely used is much less likely to have wars.

Very interesting. However I don't like unreferenced "quotes" - I like to verify my information rather than just take it on trust. Especially in a subject in which deception, lies and skulduggery is the norm.

This, remeber when Iraq was going to trade oil for gold? (Or did you believe bush.. tsk tsk)

Can some one remind me what happened to that country.

bankers need oil to back the usd as a reserve currency
since usd is off the gold standard
if all the oil is not using usd.. usd will experience hyper inflation and the usa will have to close their offshore bases and cut back on military. they will effectively be neutured

You're right here in my opinion. Money, power and maintaining / expanding power. But as a counterpoint I think the Shock Doctrine theory of economically driven overthrows eg the US in Chile, Argentina were two Chicago School ideology driven 'invasions'. Not banking exactly but same theme park.

One small component in a larger system.

These two points.

Those who get into the top merely taking advantage of trend of inevitable outcome.

the bankers wanted a booming war economy to milk (they will finance both sides, then finance rebuilding the looser (and install a central fiat-banking system, recent example: iraq), at the victors expense, then do it again, "rinse & repeat")

why do you think no. korea is in the crosshairs?
because they don't have a central fiat-bank!

problem is, the ppl, by themselves, have no desire for war, (it's much more fun swapping coins ...)
so, they lie to the ppl, prove there is a threat
 in those days it was called the gulf of tonkin event (spelling error i think  )
  the event didn't really happen, but it got the ppl to send their boys and girls off to war (again)

I am not very sure of Bankers' contribution to the wars. But an increase in the defence spending (and thereby an increase in the budget deficit) is a welcome factor for most bankers.

REALLY, how many of those countires were part of the central banking system BEFORE then after...

Believe what the media tells you and live blind.

10% of your wage goes to pay the interest on the debt your country took out against your name to be paid to the people that started this banking cartel.  Open your eyes serfs.

Of course the money has to come from somewhere to buy the guns.  Doesn't mean it is caused by or fought on the behalf of banking or bankers.  

in 1980s there was a war between Vietnam & Cambodia.  Please explain how your banker theory fits into this specific situation

It's impossible to ascribe only one cause to war. War is a too complex phenomena.
All studies on the causes of war (see https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/WPP.CHAP16.HTM) arrived to the conclusion that it's impossible to predict a war. There are circumstances that can make a war more likely between two states, like common boarders, but there are no situations that make a war inevitable.

Who do you think financed those wars? Wars are backed by fiat currency borrowed in the form of treasury bills that we all pay back with interest and through inflation. 

Dig a little deeper and money/power is always the true reason for wars. Any other reason is always a front.

Has somebody has been watching too much Zeitgeist?

Stupid tinfoil hat YouTube video.

Off the top of my head I can think of a bunch of wars that have nothing to do w banking

Vietnam
Korea
Liberia
Syria
Cambodia
Laos
Afgan-Soviet



Too many to list. Pick any 20th Century communist revolution, any religious war, any land disputes, etc..

Wrong.  You have no choice in the matter.

If you don't believe me, attempt to avoid the "deal", and I guarantee serious men with guns will show up at your door.

The general public put politician in place to serve their need. And the government demand the central bank to print money to drive down interest so the general public can have a slice of American dream.

Just because the general public get the short end of the stick doesn't mean they are not responsible for what is happening today.


Remember, for every transaction, there is a buyer and a seller. You do not have to accept the deal if you think it is immoral or if you think you are getting good short term benefit at the expense of long term benefit.

Hahaha good one. I hope you are kidding right?

Wars and poverty is 100% a result of big central banks. It's been that way since the Roman empire. If you think otherwise, you are either misinformed or way too naive.

Well said. Free markets are anathema to war. Robust economic activity tends tends to make wars less likely. You can't trade with people that you kill. 

Bullshit.

War is the health of the State.

Socialism is gang warfare.

Capitalism is non-violent competition.

Don't confuse the two.

Finance and banking sector only serve the demand of the society.


War is the natural outcome of competition and capitalism.

Worth watching.

All Wars Are Bankers' Wars
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfEBupAeo4