Author

Topic: Allowing ISIS Flags on accounts kinda fucking sucks (Read 3596 times)

legendary
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1452
-snip-
Facebook
-snip-

...removes pictures of mothers feeding their children[1]. Is that really the homepage you want to align your morals compas at?

[1] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-health/11195373/Facebook-removes-mothers-breastfeeding-photo.html
lol he ninja deleted that post.
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
Looks like I'm the only cunt around here.
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
-snip-
Facebook
-snip-

...removes pictures of mothers feeding their children[1]. Is that really the homepage you want to align your morals compas at?

[1] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-health/11195373/Facebook-removes-mothers-breastfeeding-photo.html
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
Whatever happened to all those pro ISIS twitter accounts? I realize they where deleted but was that as far as it went. Do they go knock on doors if the person was from the states for a interview or just let i go! Was thinking it would just take one person to report this account for there to be a issue for him, or maybe I am wrong. Be interesting to find out if it was seen as a recruiting tool.
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
-snip-
Any particular reason why?

Technical or level of disclosure on topic creation issue?
Forum policy.

If the topic post of a topic gives very specific rules for the topic, I will use those rules in addition to the global board policies for that topic. The starter of the topic may not change rules after posting their topic (not even by editing the topic post).

It prevents arbitrary changes of local rules, esp those created in hindsight.
legendary
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1452
I can't believe you guys, obsessing over some 16 year old's shitty attempt at 'rebellion'. Just ignore him, and let him feel the embarrassment ten years from now looking back.

Or we can support him, maybe that'll get him to fly over to Turkistan and see just how great his welcoming party will be Smiley

He is 31 and lives in Brussels, pretty much the profile of the Paris attackers.



Yeah, lets just ignore it. Just like, you know, people getting blown up on a night out by these cunts can be ignored.
So do a lot of other people. What are you suggesting?

...
You would still need to create a new topic as local rules cant be applied retroactively.
..

Any particular reason why?

Technical or level of disclosure on topic creation issue?
Forum policy.

If the topic post of a topic gives very specific rules for the topic, I will use those rules in addition to the global board policies for that topic. The starter of the topic may not change rules after posting their topic (not even by editing the topic post).
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
Offer escrow, receive negative trust
I can't believe you guys, obsessing over some 16 year old's shitty attempt at 'rebellion'. Just ignore him, and let him feel the embarrassment ten years from now looking back.

Or we can support him, maybe that'll get him to fly over to Turkistan and see just how great his welcoming party will be Smiley
full member
Activity: 171
Merit: 100
 Roll Eyes  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes by not removing the isis flag you are essentially supporting isis propaganda and in a broader sense find the promotion of hate speech, human right abuses, and ethnic cleansing perfectly acceptable on a forum dedicated to crypocurrency. 
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
The moderators are seriously concerned about protecting pedophiles and murders? They should be strung up with the rest of the ISIS loving garbage.
It should be basic common sense that an image objectively promoting hate and cruelty should be banned from a forum dedicated to anything other than hate and cruelty. 

Really deplorable inaction here mods.  Through this inaction you are aligning yourself with this criminality and undoing the work countless individuals have undertaken to eliminate the negative stereotypes of cryptocurrency. 
Roll Eyes
not doing anything about ISIS =/= promoting ISIS


This is a private website that's allowing ISIS propaganda. What the hell else do you call it?
A private website that allows the spread of information to spread freely, regardless of the accuracy and/or content of such information.

A good thing about allowing ISIS propaganda is that when an idiot tries to spread ISIS propaganda publicly, there will be a large number of sig spammers more then willing to tell such person what an idiot they are and will debunk the claims that such idiot tries to make
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
The moderators are seriously concerned about protecting pedophiles and murders? They should be strung up with the rest of the ISIS loving garbage.
It should be basic common sense that an image objectively promoting hate and cruelty should be banned from a forum dedicated to anything other than hate and cruelty. 

Really deplorable inaction here mods.  Through this inaction you are aligning yourself with this criminality and undoing the work countless individuals have undertaken to eliminate the negative stereotypes of cryptocurrency. 
Roll Eyes
not doing anything about ISIS =/= promoting ISIS


This is a private website that's allowing ISIS propaganda. What the hell else do you call it?
legendary
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1452
The moderators are seriously concerned about protecting pedophiles and murders? They should be strung up with the rest of the ISIS loving garbage.
It should be basic common sense that an image objectively promoting hate and cruelty should be banned from a forum dedicated to anything other than hate and cruelty. 

Really deplorable inaction here mods.  Through this inaction you are aligning yourself with this criminality and undoing the work countless individuals have undertaken to eliminate the negative stereotypes of cryptocurrency. 
Roll Eyes
not doing anything about ISIS =/= promoting ISIS
full member
Activity: 171
Merit: 100
It should be basic common sense that an image objectively promoting hate and cruelty should be banned from a forum dedicated to anything other than hate and cruelty. 

Really deplorable inaction here mods.  Through this inaction you are aligning yourself with this criminality and undoing the work countless individuals have undertaken to eliminate the negative stereotypes of cryptocurrency. 
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
The moderators are seriously concerned about protecting pedophiles and murders? They should be strung up with the rest of the ISIS loving garbage.
legendary
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1452
Dont know if it was suggested before: close your topic start a new one self moderated and delete all his posts in there. Redirect all people to the new one.

or just make a local rule on the current thread. some altcoin thread starters have done this before.

A local rule?

local thread rule.

26. Local thread rules, if stated properly when the thread was started, specific enough and don't conflict with the forum rules, have to be followed.

Those were mostly replaced by self-moderated topics, but local rules can be enforced at the moderator's discretion.

I've seen someone making a thread rule midway here though. but the OP of that thread ended up making a self-moderated thread anyway.

this will sound stupid because I brought it up. but go with self-moderated thread if you don't want to rely on the mods.
You would still need to create a new topic as local rules cant be applied retroactively.

Also, OP stated earlier in the topic that self-moderated topics are not an option for him, so the best choice is probably local rule. As long as the rule isn't vague and is easily decidable, moderators will enforce it.
copper member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1007
hee-ho.
Dont know if it was suggested before: close your topic start a new one self moderated and delete all his posts in there. Redirect all people to the new one.

or just make a local rule on the current thread. some altcoin thread starters have done this before.

A local rule?

local thread rule.

26. Local thread rules, if stated properly when the thread was started, specific enough and don't conflict with the forum rules, have to be followed.

Those were mostly replaced by self-moderated topics, but local rules can be enforced at the moderator's discretion.

I've seen someone making a thread rule midway here though. but the OP of that thread ended up making a self-moderated thread anyway.

this will sound stupid because I brought it up. but go with self-moderated thread if you don't want to rely on the mods.
copper member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1007
hee-ho.
Dont know if it was suggested before: close your topic start a new one self moderated and delete all his posts in there. Redirect all people to the new one.

or just make a local rule on the current thread. some altcoin thread starters have done this before.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1042
www.explorerz.top
We'll see how you feel when one shows up in your thread every day and using your coin and scaring your clients and supporters away!
Just wondering, how many clients/supporters do you think he's "scaring' away?

Impossible to count them. Grin

I'm glad that you enjoy the freedoms to mock.  Despite your fucked up ideology, there are people that go out of there way to allow you to do what you do. Even if it fucks other people up, they defend your rights to be a cunt in public and support killing innocent people so you can get your way.

Dont know if it was suggested before: close your topic start a new one self moderated and delete all his posts in there. Redirect all people to the new one.
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
I understand and I'm trying to appeal to common sense from everyone on this board. This affects all of us and the crypto we're trying to promote. My argument is not legal vs illegal, I'm talking about how we are being perceived when we allow these kind of statements (terror support). No matter how you slice it, someone who displays that symbol is a supporter and whoever allows that display is a sympathizer. No way around it. All I'm asking is that we consider what we allow ourselves to be associated with. That's all.
I agree with the fact that it probably isn't beneficial when trying to appeal to newcomers to the site. However, Bitcointalk (seems to) really push for freedom of speech, and I suppose this avatar would fall under that.
Very sad to hear. I guess I'm in the wrong place with the wrong people. There is no way anybody can rationalize allowing display of this symbol without being considered terror sympathizers.
Does anyone have a swastika as their avatar here?

I'm for freedom of speech and Im not a "terror sympathizer".  Maybe you are on the wrong forum. 

I havent seen an avatar, but there are at least a couple of fascists.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
We'll see how you feel when one shows up in your thread every day and using your coin and scaring your clients and supporters away!
Just wondering, how many clients/supporters do you think he's "scaring' away?

Impossible to count them. Grin
legendary
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1452
We'll see how you feel when one shows up in your thread every day and using your coin and scaring your clients and supporters away!
Just wondering, how many clients/supporters do you think he's "scaring' away?
legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 7005
Top Crypto Casino
I understand and I'm trying to appeal to common sense from everyone on this board. This affects all of us and the crypto we're trying to promote. My argument is not legal vs illegal, I'm talking about how we are being perceived when we allow these kind of statements (terror support). No matter how you slice it, someone who displays that symbol is a supporter and whoever allows that display is a sympathizer. No way around it. All I'm asking is that we consider what we allow ourselves to be associated with. That's all.
I agree with the fact that it probably isn't beneficial when trying to appeal to newcomers to the site. However, Bitcointalk (seems to) really push for freedom of speech, and I suppose this avatar would fall under that.
Very sad to hear. I guess I'm in the wrong place with the wrong people. There is no way anybody can rationalize allowing display of this symbol without being considered terror sympathizers.
Does anyone have a swastika as their avatar here?

I'm for freedom of speech and Im not a "terror sympathizer".  Maybe you are on the wrong forum. 
sr. member
Activity: 268
Merit: 250
-snip-
If this ISIS avatar is illegal in several countries around the world, then either block those countries IP addresses from accessing this site so this guy can keep his avatar, or ban his avatar.

Alright, while we are at it, lets ban bitcoin. Its illegal in several countries as well.
The argument is not legal vs illegal, the argument is about us (as a group) working on public perception about something we believe in (crypto). Self regulation will go a long way to improve global adoption and to get there we need to win public opinion. Allowing criminals and terrorists in our midst will not advance that perception in any way. Why even consider allowing it?

If you start to give up freedom for security the terrorists have already won. Baning the symbol will change nothing, but sweep it under the rug.
We'll see how you feel when one shows up in your thread every day and using your coin and scaring your clients and supporters away!
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
-snip-
If this ISIS avatar is illegal in several countries around the world, then either block those countries IP addresses from accessing this site so this guy can keep his avatar, or ban his avatar.

Alright, while we are at it, lets ban bitcoin. Its illegal in several countries as well.
The argument is not legal vs illegal, the argument is about us (as a group) working on public perception about something we believe in (crypto). Self regulation will go a long way to improve global adoption and to get there we need to win public opinion. Allowing criminals and terrorists in our midst will not advance that perception in any way. Why even consider allowing it?

If you start to give up freedom for security the terrorists have already won. Baning the symbol will change nothing, but sweep it under the rug.
legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 7005
Top Crypto Casino
-snip-
If this ISIS avatar is illegal in several countries around the world, then either block those countries IP addresses from accessing this site so this guy can keep his avatar, or ban his avatar.

Alright, while we are at it, lets ban bitcoin. Its illegal in several countries as well.
The argument is not legal vs illegal, the argument is about us (as a group) working on public perception about something we believe in (crypto). Self regulation will go a long way to improve global adoption and to get there we need to win public opinion. Allowing criminals and terrorists in our midst will not advance that perception in any way. Why even consider allowing it?
I'd say one out of two bitcoin users is a criminal.  And so what.  I don't like ISIS but I don't care much if some random internet user has their flag as their avatar. 
newbie
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
So this random fucking dude with an ISIS flag in his profile posts all over the place, but has chosen to make himself at home in our project; we end up losing a project member who can't stand to have him post (even on ignore) when nothing can be done to stop the use of the ISIS flag; and using self-moderated threads for a project is kinda out of the question.

So, this really fucking sucks.


.....snip.....

I can no longer be part of spreadcoin
rests on  "Abou Talha", i cannot for moral reasons be associated with a project where someone is for cruelty toward people of other
religions, against women, and stoneage punishments towards other people.

Normally i dont care about other people´s religion, but he is just too much, his tagline, and support of a flag, that now stands for
something that im totally against

im sad to say, but i am out, even though i believe in the vision of spreadcoin....

some one has already suggest to send the ip of this user to local police in "brussels"?
maybe it's a good action!
sr. member
Activity: 268
Merit: 250
I understand and I'm trying to appeal to common sense from everyone on this board. This affects all of us and the crypto we're trying to promote. My argument is not legal vs illegal, I'm talking about how we are being perceived when we allow these kind of statements (terror support). No matter how you slice it, someone who displays that symbol is a supporter and whoever allows that display is a sympathizer. No way around it. All I'm asking is that we consider what we allow ourselves to be associated with. That's all.
I agree with the fact that it probably isn't beneficial when trying to appeal to newcomers to the site. However, Bitcointalk (seems to) really push for freedom of speech, and I suppose this avatar would fall under that.
Very sad to hear. I guess I'm in the wrong place with the wrong people. There is no way anybody can rationalize allowing display of this symbol without being considered terror sympathizers.
legendary
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1024
I understand and I'm trying to appeal to common sense from everyone on this board. This affects all of us and the crypto we're trying to promote. My argument is not legal vs illegal, I'm talking about how we are being perceived when we allow these kind of statements (terror support). No matter how you slice it, someone who displays that symbol is a supporter and whoever allows that display is a sympathizer. No way around it. All I'm asking is that we consider what we allow ourselves to be associated with. That's all.
I agree with the fact that it probably isn't beneficial when trying to appeal to newcomers to the site. However, Bitcointalk (seems to) really push for freedom of speech, and I suppose this avatar would fall under that.
sr. member
Activity: 268
Merit: 250
I suspect if CBC is allowing anyone worldwide to see the ISIS flag, Bitcointalk won't get in any trouble for doing the same. Wink
Do you really want this board to be known as terrorist sympathizers?
I never mentioned that at all in my post. I was discussing coins101's idea that since the ISIS flag is illegal in a few countries, then it should be blocked when accessing Bitcointalk from these few countries as well. I was trying to explain to him that that's not how things work on the internet.
I understand and I'm trying to appeal to common sense from everyone on this board. This affects all of us and the crypto we're trying to promote. My argument is not legal vs illegal, I'm talking about how we are being perceived when we allow these kind of statements (terror support). No matter how you slice it, someone who displays that symbol is a supporter and whoever allows that display is a sympathizer. No way around it. All I'm asking is that we consider what we allow ourselves to be associated with. That's all.
legendary
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1024
I suspect if CBC is allowing anyone worldwide to see the ISIS flag, Bitcointalk won't get in any trouble for doing the same. Wink
Do you really want this board to be known as terrorist sympathizers?
I never mentioned that at all in my post. I was discussing coins101's idea that since the ISIS flag is illegal in a few countries, then it should be blocked when accessing Bitcointalk from these few countries as well. I was trying to explain to him that that's not how things work on the internet.
sr. member
Activity: 268
Merit: 250
-snip-
If this ISIS avatar is illegal in several countries around the world, then either block those countries IP addresses from accessing this site so this guy can keep his avatar, or ban his avatar.

Alright, while we are at it, lets ban bitcoin. Its illegal in several countries as well.
The argument is not legal vs illegal, the argument is about us (as a group) working on public perception about something we believe in (crypto). Self regulation will go a long way to improve global adoption and to get there we need to win public opinion. Allowing criminals and terrorists in our midst will not advance that perception in any way. Why even consider allowing it?
sr. member
Activity: 268
Merit: 250
I suspect if CBC is allowing anyone worldwide to see the ISIS flag, Bitcointalk won't get in any trouble for doing the same. Wink
Do you really want this board to be known as terrorist sympathizers?
legendary
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1024
...
The site is being hosted in the US, so I'm assuming they're abiding by American laws.

...



America doesn't give a shit about country borders.

If this ISIS avatar is illegal in several countries around the world, then either block those countries IP addresses from accessing this site so this guy can keep his avatar, or ban his avatar.
It seems you completed ignored my post except for the first line, so I'll pose my question to you once again:

The site is being hosted in the US, so I'm assuming they're abiding by American laws.

I have a question for you though; is CBC.ca blocked in the Netherlands? They're often running stories with images or videos that include the ISIS flag. According to your logic, CBC.ca, or at least the CBC.ca stories on ISIS should be blocked when they're trying to be accessed on a Netherlands IP. Hint: Neither CBC.ca, or the ISIS articles on CBC are blocked on Netherlands IPs. I see no problems with this forum allowing images of ISIS flags, because I suspect if CBC is allowing anyone worldwide to see the ISIS flag, Bitcointalk won't get in any trouble for doing the same. Wink

I don't agree with having an ISIS flag as an avatar, but there's a great ignore feature on this forum so that you don't need to see that avatar, or any posts from that user anymore.
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
...
The site is being hosted in the US, so I'm assuming they're abiding by American laws.

...



America doesn't give a shit about country borders.

If this ISIS avatar is illegal in several countries around the world, then either block those countries IP addresses from accessing this site so this guy can keep his avatar, or ban his avatar.


Wait... also ponzi schemes are illegal all over the world.. but here it's not a problem to open a thread in the investor-based games board.


What do you think about it?

I think you should find another reason , because the illegal thing doesn't work.
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
-snip-
If this ISIS avatar is illegal in several countries around the world, then either block those countries IP addresses from accessing this site so this guy can keep his avatar, or ban his avatar.

Alright, while we are at it, lets ban bitcoin. Its illegal in several countries as well.
sr. member
Activity: 268
Merit: 250
It's called freedom of speech and expression, the moderators aren't going to just outright ban someone because they're putting a fucking flag on their avatar.

I understand all that.

But we have to look at that 'fucking flag' every fucking day. And others looking into the thread probably wonder if its some sort of terrorist cell operating on BCT.

So don't give me the high and fucking mighty. If you're next door neighbor decided to put that flag up outside their front door and you saw it everyday and those walking past saw it, how long do you think you would last with your freedom of speech point?  A day; a week; a month; a year?

Yeah, thought so. It's easy to post and run. It's different when you have to put up with this fucking shit every day.

I share the same sentiment. It's more than a "fucking Avatar", it's someone showing support for something so repulsive that the mere sight of that symbol scares people away. I'm not in crypto to gamble or speculate, I'm actively trying to use it for business. I'm educating business people on how to use it, what it can do for their business, etc.

We all agree that global adoption of crypto's depends on image for one. I've worked hard trying to dispel the criminal aspect of it, but having some idiot showcasing terror symbols gives me (and other people) not a chance in hell.

Yes, we all understand the "Ignore" feature, but someone who's not familiar with this forum and does some research and sees this, well, needless to say there is no way of explaining.

What's next? Swastikas again? Let me drop it on your thread every day. You won't be so dismissive then.

PS: my understanding is that the guy who left effectively lost business when his partners and clients saw this terrorist supporter. Nobody can ever rationalize that, free speech? Next to Hitler and the Nazi's!
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
Just let him do what he wants, why are you guys giving him negative trusts just for having a flag as his avatar?

+1
All this cinema for a small picture.
legendary
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1024
It is illegal to display the flag in a few countries. Fact.


Don't ask me for an opinion.  I want to know the official view on allowing this illegal content in the countries where it is illegal to display the ISIS flag.

I accept that where it is not illegal to display the flag I just have to take the butt hurt, if the mods have taken the view to allow it on the basis of free speech.

In addition, would you allow it if it was illegal to display the flag in America?
The site is being hosted in the US, so I'm assuming they're abiding by American laws.

I have a question for you though; is CBC.ca blocked in the Netherlands? They're often running stories with images or videos that include the ISIS flag. According to your logic, CBC.ca, or at least the CBC.ca stories on ISIS should be blocked when they're trying to be accessed on a Netherlands IP. Hint: Neither CBC.ca, or the ISIS articles on CBC are blocked on Netherlands IPs. I see no problems with this forum allowing images of ISIS flags, because I suspect if CBC is allowing anyone worldwide to see the ISIS flag, Bitcointalk won't get in any trouble for doing the same. Wink

I don't agree with having an ISIS flag as an avatar, but there's a great ignore feature on this forum so that you don't need to see that avatar, or any posts from that user anymore.
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
Not taking it personally.

Read the quoted text in the OP.  Face palm I can live with. Losing a core team member goes beyond sitting idly by. I tried the ignore button for months.

I agree, it sucks. Fuck him.. but I'm not sure I follow this:

Quote
i cannot for moral reasons be associated with a project where someone is for cruelty toward people of other
religions, against women, and stoneage punishments towards other people.

How is Abou Talha involved in the coin? What's stopping ISIS from using the coin in the future, after all this is a crypto currency available worldwide? There's 171 pages so figured I would ask you first.

Didn't think it would be that easy to troll (?) someone into giving up on a project.
legendary
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1452
You put up an argument that saudia Arabia is doing something similar to ISIS, so you could tear down an unrelated point. That's your strawman.

America kills people that break certain laws. So your arguement is about how governments execute people.  That is nothing to do with a group of terrorist who have no country or government. It is irrelevant to my point.

I would still like a view on why allowing the avatar is OK given it breaks the law to do so in atleast three countries.
Are you saying that if something is banned in a few countries, we should ban that on bitcointalk?
inb4 strawman
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
@coins101,


At the end I can only say :





Nothing personal, just an opinion.
legendary
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1452
I've been told that displaying the ISIS flag is illegal in the Netherlands. So this forum is breaking the law unless IPs from there are blocked from accessing the forum. How many other countries are the same?
You should read that again.
In Netherlands it's forbidden to use an ISIS flag in public.
I've got a feeling that you can still find the ISIS flag on google images just fine in the Netherlands.
edit:
you can even find it on a dutch website. http://www.metronieuws.nl/nieuws/buitenland/2016/01/isis-halveert-salarissen-vechters
end edit

Saudi Arabia is your own strawman.
*facepalm*
That was directed at your remark that implied killing people is covered under freedom of speech.

My point stands. Anyone dealing with him might end up being accused of terrorist financing if it turns out he is doing just that. Neg trust is valid. Deal with caution.
And how does that have anything to do with whether he's a scammer or not? Do I need to remind you what the definition of a scammer is? People like you are turning the trust system into a upvote/downvote system.
legendary
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1452
Isis cut off the heads of Innocent people to get media attention. 
You know who else beheads people in public? Saudi Arabia. How about we ban their flag as well?

But, hey, thats benefit of free speech.  And I will  defend with my last breath their rights to kill people for free publicity.
Roll Eyes
Just so you know, killing people isn't part of free speech. Nice strawman though.
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
Just ignore him....

But that would mean being intelligent!


Oh, yeah ....  I suppose   Grin !
member
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
let me know thoose ipbackswitchers pleasse  Shocked  Wink
hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 501
In Netherlands it's forbidden to use an ISIS flag in public. Maybe this rule should also count on this forum all support for terrorism should be banned.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
Just ignore him....

But that would mean being intelligent!
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
Why is there so much fuss over someone who has a flag as their avatar? Just let him do what he wants, why are you guys giving him negative trusts just for having a flag as his avatar? This is really fucked up.

Just so we are on the same page.

Isis cut off the heads of Innocent people to get media attention.  But, hey, thats free speech.

Wana talk about the crimes done in the name of the great britian flag union jack[1]? Having the avatar of a flag is not the same as beheading people, which is not possible to do on this forum anyway, so whats your argument again?

[1] https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/your-point-is-invalid-554884
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
Why is there so much fuss over someone who has a flag as their avatar? Just let him do what he wants, why are you guys giving him negative trusts just for having a flag as his avatar? This is really fucked up.

Just so we are on the same page.

Isis cut off the heads of Innocent people to get media attention.  But, hey, thats free speech.



The free speech (I suppose) in this case is that anyone can put the flag (as avatar) that he wants... not to cut off the heads of people.
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 538
Why is there so much fuss over someone who has a flag as their avatar? Just let him do what he wants, why are you guys giving him negative trusts just for having a flag as his avatar? This is really fucked up.
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
Just ignore him....
newbie
Activity: 94
Merit: 0


US Military has killed orders higher more civilians than ISIS ever will. And yet you're using US currency. Additionally, the US is directly responsible for creating the problem of 'ISIS'. And to my knowledge, the extreme majority of terrorists are supplied their weaponry by US companies. I do not know what the ISIS flag looks like because I don't have the time or resources to get involved in politics and the horrible things that happen across the globe, but to me, the American flag is a symbol of the most vicious world superpower that the human race has ever seen, controlled by a corrupt turnkey totalitarian government that creates propaganda for neo-fascist causes. Just because something is pure evil doesn't mean you shouldn't tolerate it.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
i didnt even knew that its a flag in the first place  Grin i dont understand why people are more sentimental ,why cant you live like humans  Wink

@ Lethn, the image you posted made me  cry months back, and i am really sad to see it again.

What image? I didn't post that lol, it was him, anyway, you all have ignore features and block features on this forum, nothing stopping you from posting things you find offensive, I just think that censorship is the tool of people who would rather live in delusion and ignore reality.
legendary
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1452
It's called freedom of speech and expression, the moderators aren't going to just outright ban someone because they're putting a fucking flag on their avatar.

I understand all that.

But we have to look at that 'fucking flag' every fucking day. And others looking into the thread probably wonder if its some sort of terrorist cell operating on BCT.

So don't give me the high and fucking mighty. If you're next door neighbor decided to put that flag up outside their front door and you saw it everyday and those walking past saw it, how long do you think you would last with your freedom of speech point?  A day; a week; a month; a year?

Yeah, thought so. It's easy to post and run. It's different when you have to put up with this fucking shit every day.
1. get ABP
2. right-click avatar -> adblock plus: block image...

was that so hard?

Also, regarding your flag analogy: Call me insensitive, but I would be okay with that forever (assuming it's not overtly annoying, but I would treat it as if it was any other flag). Unlike you, I believe in freedom of expression for all, not just for whom I agree with.

Just neg'd the guy out of principle.
Now that's clearly trust abuse. The description for negative trust is "You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer.". I doubt that any reasonable person would think someone with ISIS flag means they're a scammer.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
i didnt even knew that its a flag in the first place  Grin i dont understand why people are more sentimental ,why cant you live like humans  Wink

@ Lethn, the image you posted made me  cry months back, and i am really sad to see it again.
hero member
Activity: 920
Merit: 1014
I wouldn't waste my piss on this flag. Freedom of speech is one thing....Freedom to be a a BARBARIAN thug scumbag piece of low life shit, Camel Raping, inbred   is another thing.

Fuck that flag and everything it represents!
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
I'd last all my life, must be because I'm an Anarchist, I'm not so easily provoked by simple images and symbols.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
Just neg'd the guy out of principle.



Guys just trolling and you give him more power by showing how emotionally charged he can get you.
Its best to just put him on ignore if it gets you fired up.
legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 7005
Top Crypto Casino
Just neg'd the guy out of principle.


I can see the point of not trusting someone belonging to ISIS, but the trust feedback is really if you think they're going to scam.  There's a whole topic devoted to this that just started.  It's not really a place to spout ideology views.  I say this even though I probably agree with yours.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
It's called freedom of speech and expression, the moderators aren't going to just outright ban someone because they're putting a fucking flag on their avatar.
legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1043
Just neg'd the guy out of principle.

legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 7005
Top Crypto Casino
I saw the link and it's now locked--did the project die because of this or what?  And sorry I'm not buying the comparison of isis and Britain.  And that argument carries little weight on the English speaking section of this forum.
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
It's just a flag. Ignore it. He probably only has it because it will get a rise out of people and you're giving it to him. Your Point is Invalid above has a flag that is responsible for more death and slavery than Isis will ever achieve but should he or the forum remove it if someone complains or is offended by it? No.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 510
Dear me, I think I'm becoming a god
What project are you talking about and what member is sporting the flag? 
this project https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-spreadcoin-decentralize-everything-decentralized-blockexplorer-coming-1045373
this user https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/abou-talha-434490

dont see why you guys take it serious, if you avoid it it will go away, do you guys think he is gonna change it now with all this attention?
legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 7005
Top Crypto Casino
What project are you talking about and what member is sporting the flag? 
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
.....
.....snip.....

I can no longer be part of spreadcoin
rests on  "Abou Talha", i cannot for moral reasons be associated with a project where someone is for cruelty toward people of other
religions, against women, and stoneage punishments towards other people.

Normally i dont care about other people´s religion, but he is just too much, his tagline, and support of a flag, that now stands for
something that im totally against

im sad to say, but i am out, even though i believe in the vision of spreadcoin....

edits
Jump to: