Author

Topic: Almost 8,000 Navy chiefs face ax (Read 747 times)

hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 506
August 18, 2014, 08:29:33 PM
#5
No the issue here is the Fleet-in-being and massed carrier tactics that were doctrine sound in WW2 are no longer relevant in the contemporary era.

A new carrier has a $32 billion lifetime cost and then they need destroyers, frigates and other screens (billions more) and it can take years to construct this.  For the same price, I can invest in more strategic aircraft and supersonic anti-ship missiles and it doesn't take years to build them.  

As well there's a market for reselling aircraft and missiles... old naval vessels.. not a whole lot, although Angola supposedly bought an aircraft carrier months ago  Huh
sr. member
Activity: 277
Merit: 250
August 18, 2014, 07:21:05 PM
#4
Obama is now flexible... Putins request has been granted.
legendary
Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386
Viva Ut Vivas
August 18, 2014, 06:07:24 PM
#3
While the Navy is useful, they have not played a dominant role in these past two wars. Cutting the navy down is inevitable. They did too well at eliminating any sea battles.
sr. member
Activity: 444
Merit: 260
August 18, 2014, 04:25:07 PM
#2
Interesting they claim "It has absolutely nothing to do with force-shaping" but I have heard rumours (info wars if I recall correctly) that certain officers are being asked questions like would you be willing to exercise force on US civilians. I wonder if this is not a prelude to a more sinister shake-up to follow, or an attempt to put positive spin it.
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001
August 18, 2014, 03:43:15 PM
#1
Quote
WASHINGTON — Almost 8,000 senior enlisted personnel must go before a continuation board later this year to determine whether they can continue to serve or must retire.

The board — the first since early 2013 — will convene Oct. 27, according to a Navy document released Aug. 14.

At risk are between 7,500 and 8,000 retirement-eligible active and reserve E-7s, E-8s and E-9s with at least at least three years' time in rate.

But there is a big upside to the process: Clearing out senior enlisted who have engaged in misconduct or whose performance has slipped noticeably makes way for hot running sailors to move up.

More...http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/08/18/navy-chiefs-continuation-boards/14223129/
Jump to: