I've posted a current overview of scrypt merge-mined coins here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/overview-scrypt-auxpow-coins-5165107
HTH
Topic: Altcoin Merged-Mining ChainID Registry (Read 3794 times)
Please add:
Another row "announcement link" to the projects would be awesome
i.e. 🌟 [SIL] 611 (SixEleven) ◥◣ FREE ANONYMOUS DOMAIN NAME SYSTEM ◥◣ 🌟
Code:
Algo: SHA256D
Code: 611
Name: SixEleven
ChID: 0
Another row "announcement link" to the projects would be awesome
i.e. 🌟 [SIL] 611 (SixEleven) ◥◣ FREE ANONYMOUS DOMAIN NAME SYSTEM ◥◣ 🌟
NewYorkCoin - Scrypt
0x7C1; // 1985
0x7C1; // 1985
terracoin - 0x32 - 50
23skidoo - 0x39 - 57
myriadcoin(sha256) - 0x5a - 90
syscoin(sha256) - 0x1000 - 4096
23skidoo - 0x39 - 57
myriadcoin(sha256) - 0x5a - 90
syscoin(sha256) - 0x1000 - 4096
EmerCoin/EMC is moving to merged mining with chainID 666
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17851981
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17851981
Pesetacoin = PTC
Some new coins to add to the list:
| Algo | Code | Name | Chain ID |
| Scrypt | TET | Tetcoin | 29797 |
| Scrypt | VIA | Viacoin | 86 |
Namecoin is chain ID 1, not 0. See https://github.com/namecoin/namecore/blob/master/src/chainparams.cpp#L57.
new coin just added to merge
Blake256 LIT Lithium 6
also BlakeBitcoin is commonly know as BBTC rather than BBK
Blake256 LIT Lithium 6
also BlakeBitcoin is commonly know as BBTC rather than BBK
CanadaEcoin [CDN] has ChainID=1 which interferers with both Syscoin and UnitedScryptCoin.
Updated with blake 256 coins. Would MM CryptoNote coins be useful?
They would be useful to add, yes.
It's mainly to ensure theres no collisions. If 2 coins have the same id it means they both cannot be merged-mined at the same time as far as i know.
Awesome stuff. Is the purpose of this to have some type of universal language for merge mining children?
What happens if two coins happened to choose the same ChildID without knowing?
What happens if two coins happened to choose the same ChildID without knowing?
Updated with blake 256 coins. Would MM CryptoNote coins be useful?
thanks updated
LottoShares is LTS and not LTC.
Every coin that can be merge mined needs to have it's own ChainID.
I will keep a list in this topic.
Distinctions:
-It isnt possible to merge mine across different algorithm's
-It isnt possible to merge mine coins with the same Chain ID on the same algorithm being mined
I will keep a list in this topic.
| Algo | Code | Name | Chain ID |
| Scrypt | FSC | Fusioncoin | 0 ? |
| Scrypt | USC | UnitedScryptCoin | 1 |
| Scrypt | HUC | Huntercoin | 2 |
| Scrypt | BSS | Bosscoin | 4 |
| Scrypt | RSV | Reservecoin | 7 |
| Scrypt | BUR | Burbucoin | 32 |
| Scrypt | TPS | Templecoin | 36 |
| Scrypt | SPH | Sapphirecoin | 53 |
| Scrypt | PST | Pesetacoin | 71 |
| Scrypt | LEAF | Leafcoin | 77 |
| Scrypt | KAR | Karpelescoin | 87 |
| Scrypt | MIM | MagicInternetMoney | 134 |
| Scrypt | GRE | Greencoin | NotSet |
| Scrypt | SYS | Syscoin | 1 |
| Scrypt | DOGE | Dogecoin | 62 |
| Scrypt | LTS | LottoShares | 6042 |
| Scrypt | TCO | TacoCoin | 18 |
| Scrypt | ULTC | Umbrella-LTC | 13804 |
| SHA256D | IXC | IXCoin | 3 |
| SHA256D | I0C | I0Coin | 2 |
| SHA256D | DVC | DevCoin | 4 |
| SHA256D | NMC | NameCoin | 0 |
| SHA256D | GRP | GroupCoin | 5 |
| SHA256D | VIK | VikingCoin | NotSet |
| SHA256D | HUC | HunterCoin | 6 |
| SHA256D | FSC | Fusioncoin | 0 ? |
| SHA256D | CLC | CoiledCoin | 16 |
| SHA256D | XGG | GiestGeld | 0 ? |
| Blake256 | BBK | BlakeBitcoin | 5 |
| Blake256 | PHO | Photon | 2 |
| Blake256 | XDQ | Dirac | 3 |
| Blake256 | ELT | Electron | 7 |
| Blake256 | UMO | Universal Molecule | 15 |
Distinctions:
-It isnt possible to merge mine across different algorithm's
-It isnt possible to merge mine coins with the same Chain ID on the same algorithm being mined
Jump to: