Alternative for Lopp's Bitcoin confirmation risk calculator

NotATether

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 6660

bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on March 22, 2023, 04:14:31 AM

This tool is accurate: https://web.archive.org/web/20181231045818/https://people.xiph.org/~greg/attack_success.html

Or just open an issue on Lopp's GitHub. I'm sure he would fix the error once being made aware of it.

Or just wait for me to create a tool for it on my website, I can rapidly prototype anything written in JavaScript these days. It doesn't look so hard to make.

o_e_l_e_o

legendary

Activity: 2268

Merit: 18509

This tool is accurate: https://web.archive.org/web/20181231045818/https://people.xiph.org/~greg/attack_success.html

Or just open an issue on Lopp's GitHub. I'm sure he would fix the error once being made aware of it.

dzungmobile

sr. member

Activity: 658

Merit: 354

I stand with Ukraine!

How many Bitcoin confirmations is enough? with open source code from Jameson Lopp that is built with formula from Bitcoin Whitepaper.

Then a finding from a forum member @o_e_l_e_o

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on March 08, 2023, 05:09:07 PM

His numbers are actually a little off.

For 33.55% of the hashrate, the probability an attacker is successful after 1 confirmation is 70.12%, after 3 confirmations is 43.54%, and after 6 confirmations is 23.09%.

On closer examination of the code here, it seems the error is that his calculation is not taking in to account fractions of a percent. You can test this yourself by putting in the hashrate box, for example, 30 and 30.999, and seeing they produce the same result.

Anyone can build your tool but without that bug?

Community will have a more accurate tool to use.

Topic: Alternative for Lopp's Bitcoin confirmation risk calculator (Read 59 times)