I need some help. I can't get my Ryzen 3900x to mine monero on RandomX any higher than 9200khs. I have the following set up...
MSI X470 Max
Ryzen 3900x
2 8gb Consair Vengence 3600mhz CL18 Ram
570 4gb card.
windows 10
I've tried stock CPU settings.
I've done the DRAM calculator... Anytime I enter in the timings from the calculator, the Memory just locks up and doesn't boot up into Windows 10.
I've done simple adjustments like OC the CPU from 3800mhz to 4100mhz.
Just looking for proper set up of timing to make this CPU mine atleast over 11000 khs.
Thanks in advance
Topic: AMD Ryzen 9 🖥️ 3900x RandomX mining benchmarks (Read 2231 times)
Hitting 15kh/s + on 3900x now. Could prob push it to nearly 16kh/s but 15 keeps it under 200 watts at the wall 
Is it with MSR mod? What's your memory setup and CPU speed?Nice stats, 15 kh/s really nice performance on 3900x
I've prepared a RandomX boost guide for Windows (it's the same MSR mod as the one I had for Linux before):
https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e9tuvd/randomx_boost_guide_for_ryzen_on_windows_9100_hs/
It gave me +6% hashrate. Can anyone test it?
https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e9tuvd/randomx_boost_guide_for_ryzen_on_windows_9100_hs/
It gave me +6% hashrate. Can anyone test it?
Great. My 3900x can do 14000 H/s now.
Hitting 15kh/s + on 3900x now. Could prob push it to nearly 16kh/s but 15 keeps it under 200 watts at the wall
Is it with MSR mod? What's your memory setup and CPU speed?Yup, 4.1 GHZ
Code:
[2019-12-13 18:51:34.733] net new job from xmr-us-east1.nanopool.org:14444 diff 480045 algo rx/0 height 1988139
[2019-12-13 18:51:45.276] cpu accepted (3002/6) diff 480045 (146 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:51:55.512] speed 10s/60s/15m 15096.1 15094.6 15094.6 H/s max 15104.3 H/s
[2019-12-13 18:52:34.973] net new job from xmr-us-east1.nanopool.org:14444 diff 480045 algo rx/0 height 1988139
[2019-12-13 18:52:55.567] speed 10s/60s/15m 15094.9 15094.6 15094.6 H/s max 15104.3 H/s
[2019-12-13 18:53:31.256] cpu accepted (3003/6) diff 480045 (164 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:53:32.369] cpu accepted (3004/6) diff 480045 (156 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:53:34.975] net new job from xmr-us-east1.nanopool.org:14444 diff 480045 algo rx/0 height 1988139
[2019-12-13 18:53:43.023] cpu accepted (3005/6) diff 480045 (163 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:53:48.818] cpu accepted (3006/6) diff 480045 (155 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:53:55.624] speed 10s/60s/15m 15095.0 15093.6 15094.6 H/s max 15104.3 H/s
[2019-12-13 18:54:26.155] cpu accepted (3007/6) diff 480045 (159 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:54:35.170] net new job from xmr-us-east1.nanopool.org:14444 diff 480045 algo rx/0 height 1988139
[2019-12-13 18:54:50.972] net new job from xmr-us-east1.nanopool.org:14444 diff 480045 algo rx/0 height 1988140
[2019-12-13 18:54:55.684] speed 10s/60s/15m 15092.9 15095.1 15094.6 H/s max 15104.3 H/s
[2019-12-13 18:55:08.841] cpu accepted (3008/6) diff 480045 (162 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:55:41.519] cpu accepted (3009/6) diff 480045 (164 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:55:45.493] cpu accepted (3010/6) diff 480045 (168 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:55:51.156] net new job from xmr-us-east1.nanopool.org:14444 diff 480045 algo rx/0 height 1988140
[2019-12-13 18:55:55.742] speed 10s/60s/15m 15092.7 15085.0 15093.9 H/s max 15104.3 H/s
[2019-12-13 18:56:03.647] cpu accepted (3011/6) diff 480045 (163 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:56:51.194] net new job from xmr-us-east1.nanopool.org:14444 diff 480045 algo rx/0 height 1988140
[2019-12-13 18:56:55.796] speed 10s/60s/15m 15093.4 15095.3 15094.0 H/s max 15104.3 H/s
[2019-12-13 18:57:20.811] cpu accepted (3012/6) diff 480045 (172 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:57:29.038] cpu accepted (3013/6) diff 480045 (166 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:57:51.367] net new job from xmr-us-east1.nanopool.org:14444 diff 480045 algo rx/0 height 1988140
[2019-12-13 18:57:51.965] cpu accepted (3014/6) diff 480045 (175 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:57:55.724] cpu accepted (3015/6) diff 480045 (159 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:57:55.838] speed 10s/60s/15m 15093.6 15095.8 15094.1 H/s max 15104.3 H/s
[2019-12-13 18:57:57.378] cpu accepted (3016/6) diff 480045 (165 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:51:45.276] cpu accepted (3002/6) diff 480045 (146 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:51:55.512] speed 10s/60s/15m 15096.1 15094.6 15094.6 H/s max 15104.3 H/s
[2019-12-13 18:52:34.973] net new job from xmr-us-east1.nanopool.org:14444 diff 480045 algo rx/0 height 1988139
[2019-12-13 18:52:55.567] speed 10s/60s/15m 15094.9 15094.6 15094.6 H/s max 15104.3 H/s
[2019-12-13 18:53:31.256] cpu accepted (3003/6) diff 480045 (164 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:53:32.369] cpu accepted (3004/6) diff 480045 (156 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:53:34.975] net new job from xmr-us-east1.nanopool.org:14444 diff 480045 algo rx/0 height 1988139
[2019-12-13 18:53:43.023] cpu accepted (3005/6) diff 480045 (163 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:53:48.818] cpu accepted (3006/6) diff 480045 (155 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:53:55.624] speed 10s/60s/15m 15095.0 15093.6 15094.6 H/s max 15104.3 H/s
[2019-12-13 18:54:26.155] cpu accepted (3007/6) diff 480045 (159 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:54:35.170] net new job from xmr-us-east1.nanopool.org:14444 diff 480045 algo rx/0 height 1988139
[2019-12-13 18:54:50.972] net new job from xmr-us-east1.nanopool.org:14444 diff 480045 algo rx/0 height 1988140
[2019-12-13 18:54:55.684] speed 10s/60s/15m 15092.9 15095.1 15094.6 H/s max 15104.3 H/s
[2019-12-13 18:55:08.841] cpu accepted (3008/6) diff 480045 (162 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:55:41.519] cpu accepted (3009/6) diff 480045 (164 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:55:45.493] cpu accepted (3010/6) diff 480045 (168 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:55:51.156] net new job from xmr-us-east1.nanopool.org:14444 diff 480045 algo rx/0 height 1988140
[2019-12-13 18:55:55.742] speed 10s/60s/15m 15092.7 15085.0 15093.9 H/s max 15104.3 H/s
[2019-12-13 18:56:03.647] cpu accepted (3011/6) diff 480045 (163 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:56:51.194] net new job from xmr-us-east1.nanopool.org:14444 diff 480045 algo rx/0 height 1988140
[2019-12-13 18:56:55.796] speed 10s/60s/15m 15093.4 15095.3 15094.0 H/s max 15104.3 H/s
[2019-12-13 18:57:20.811] cpu accepted (3012/6) diff 480045 (172 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:57:29.038] cpu accepted (3013/6) diff 480045 (166 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:57:51.367] net new job from xmr-us-east1.nanopool.org:14444 diff 480045 algo rx/0 height 1988140
[2019-12-13 18:57:51.965] cpu accepted (3014/6) diff 480045 (175 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:57:55.724] cpu accepted (3015/6) diff 480045 (159 ms)
[2019-12-13 18:57:55.838] speed 10s/60s/15m 15093.6 15095.8 15094.1 H/s max 15104.3 H/s
[2019-12-13 18:57:57.378] cpu accepted (3016/6) diff 480045 (165 ms)
Hitting 15kh/s + on 3900x now. Could prob push it to nearly 16kh/s but 15 keeps it under 200 watts at the wall
Really impressive jstefanop, which cooling solution are you using? and what temperature your 3900x is working.
Stock cooler and 3000 CL14 memory. Running around 78C
Hitting 15kh/s + on 3900x now. Could prob push it to nearly 16kh/s but 15 keeps it under 200 watts at the wall
Really impressive jstefanop, which cooling solution are you using? and what temperature your 3900x is working.
Hitting 15kh/s + on 3900x now. Could prob push it to nearly 16kh/s but 15 keeps it under 200 watts at the wall
Is it with MSR mod? What's your memory setup and CPU speed?
Hitting 15kh/s + on 3900x now. Could prob push it to nearly 16kh/s but 15 keeps it under 200 watts at the wall
I am a fan of AMD procie, and if we talk about the price AMD processors are much cheaper compare to Intel Processors, glad to see that they launched the ryzen 9 I hope that it will available soon in my country.
guys who where telling me that 2 memory sticks will be cap, and there wont be any speed increase if i add more memory where wrong. Ading 2 more sticks to my current system increased my performance by 10% without any over-clocks. Video : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeVhjAfgMqw&t
That is an interesting find, I would not have thought that anything other than dual channel memory or quad channel memory(in a system that supports it) would have an impact the hash rate. It makes me wonder if populating all the memory channels in a threadripper system would have similar results. I do not think the gains are enough to warrant the extra memory, but it would be a fun experiment just for the sake of science.
I like your build in the video, the MSI cards look pretty sweet
Yes its all about caclulation best price per hash. Like my RAM was quite cheap 3600 mhz 8gb CL19 was 50euro for a pair. So it makes sense to pay extra 5% to get 10% speed increase. I wonder if i had better quality ram, would it affect my performance.
P.S man these MSI RX5700 are so sexy they really feel premium cards in metal case.
I've prepared a RandomX boost guide for Windows (it's the same MSR mod as the one I had for Linux before):
https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e9tuvd/randomx_boost_guide_for_ryzen_on_windows_9100_hs/
It gave me +6% hashrate. Can anyone test it?
https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e9tuvd/randomx_boost_guide_for_ryzen_on_windows_9100_hs/
It gave me +6% hashrate. Can anyone test it?
guys who where telling me that 2 memory sticks will be cap, and there wont be any speed increase if i add more memory where wrong. Ading 2 more sticks to my current system increased my performance by 10% without any over-clocks. Video : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeVhjAfgMqw&t
That is an interesting find, I would not have thought that anything other than dual channel memory or quad channel memory(in a system that supports it) would have an impact the hash rate. It makes me wonder if populating all the memory channels in a threadripper system would have similar results. I do not think the gains are enough to warrant the extra memory, but it would be a fun experiment just for the sake of science.
I like your build in the video, the MSI cards look pretty sweet
guys who where telling me that 2 memory sticks will be cap, and there wont be any speed increase if i add more memory where wrong. Ading 2 more sticks to my current system increased my performance by 10% without any over-clocks. Video : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeVhjAfgMqw&t
Yes, the theory is that having more independent memory ranks is better for RandomX. Two dual-rank sticks are better than two single-rank sticks, 4 same-rank sticks are better than 2 same-rank sticks. But more sticks and dual-rank sticks usually mean worse timings, so speedup is not guaranteed.
guys who where telling me that 2 memory sticks will be cap, and there wont be any speed increase if i add more memory where wrong. Ading 2 more sticks to my current system increased my performance by 10% without any over-clocks. Video : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeVhjAfgMqw&t
Can anyone proficient in Linux try this RandomX boost guide?
https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e962fu/9526_hs_on_ryzen_7_3700x_xmrig_520_1gb_pages_msr/
I was able to get +5% on my R7 3700X, I think 9526 h/s is a record for this CPU now.
https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e962fu/9526_hs_on_ryzen_7_3700x_xmrig_520_1gb_pages_msr/
I was able to get +5% on my R7 3700X, I think 9526 h/s is a record for this CPU now.
What kind of power draw are you getting with this setup, I imagine its something north of 150+ watts for the cpu give or take 10 watts.
This setup got me to 8880 h/s from my original 8444 h/s on a 3ghz threadripper and dropped the power draw by about 9-10 watts going from 185 to 175-176 at the wall. I am sure I could get it to 10000+ h/s but that would take water and a much larger power draw. Pretty happy with this gain and drop in power consumption
Can anyone proficient in Linux try this RandomX boost guide?
https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e962fu/9526_hs_on_ryzen_7_3700x_xmrig_520_1gb_pages_msr/
I was able to get +5% on my R7 3700X, I think 9526 h/s is a record for this CPU now.
https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e962fu/9526_hs_on_ryzen_7_3700x_xmrig_520_1gb_pages_msr/
I was able to get +5% on my R7 3700X, I think 9526 h/s is a record for this CPU now.
What kind of power draw are you getting with this setup, I imagine its something north of 150+ watts for the cpu give or take 10 watts.
Can anyone proficient in Linux try this RandomX boost guide?
https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e962fu/9526_hs_on_ryzen_7_3700x_xmrig_520_1gb_pages_msr/
I was able to get +5% on my R7 3700X, I think 9526 h/s is a record for this CPU now.
https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e962fu/9526_hs_on_ryzen_7_3700x_xmrig_520_1gb_pages_msr/
I was able to get +5% on my R7 3700X, I think 9526 h/s is a record for this CPU now.
What kind of power draw are you getting with this setup, I imagine its something north of 150+ watts for the cpu give or take 10 watts.
Can anyone proficient in Linux try this RandomX boost guide?
https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e962fu/9526_hs_on_ryzen_7_3700x_xmrig_520_1gb_pages_msr/
I was able to get +5% on my R7 3700X, I think 9526 h/s is a record for this CPU now.
https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e962fu/9526_hs_on_ryzen_7_3700x_xmrig_520_1gb_pages_msr/
I was able to get +5% on my R7 3700X, I think 9526 h/s is a record for this CPU now.
I tested this RagerX yesterday and it was slower than XMRig on my R7 3700X. 8200 h/s RagerX vs 8450 h/s XMRig (all stock 3700X with tuned memory).
well as your the xmrrig dev and are prob optimising your miner for your own equipment its not really a fair comparison is it?
My equipment is pretty standard, I just make sure everything is tested in perfect conditions - properly tuned, no background programs eating CPU, updates and unneeded Windows services turned off etc. I need this to easily reproduce the same hashrate at every test - it's hard to tell if some change in the code improves hashrate +0.1% or makes it worse -0.1% without this kind of stability."According to the devs..."
Why does CMB publish this kind of crap without any attempt to verify the outrageous claims.
Any miner that locks you into their ecosystem is to be avoided. There's no telling what kind of malware
might be buried in their OS.
No one is going to magically come up with a new faster implementation. There is strong competition between
xmrig & xmr-stak, not to mention Tevador's reference implementation. I doubt there is much room for improvement.
I tested this RagerX yesterday and it was slower than XMRig on my R7 3700X. 8200 h/s RagerX vs 8450 h/s XMRig (all stock 3700X with tuned memory).
well as your the xmrrig dev and are prob optimising your miner for your own equipment its not really a fair comparison is it?
My equipment is pretty standard, I just make sure everything is tested in perfect conditions - properly tuned, no background programs eating CPU, updates and unneeded Windows services turned off etc. I need this to easily reproduce the same hashrate at every test - it's hard to tell if some change in the code improves hashrate +0.1% or makes it worse -0.1% without this kind of stability. I tested this RagerX yesterday and it was slower than XMRig on my R7 3700X. 8200 h/s RagerX vs 8450 h/s XMRig (all stock 3700X with tuned memory).
well as your the xmrrig dev and are prob optimising your miner for your own equipment its not really a fair comparison is it?
I finally ended up going down to a 3 GHZ clock speed on the threadripper 1950x cpu with 3400 ram speed and a gtx 1060 sitting idle. The cpu temp sits around 62-63c with a Noctua U14S and 3 low power draw case fans to make sure I have decent airflow. I am getting 8444 h/s with this setup while drawing about 185 watts at the wall and keeping temps at an acceptable level. This is not a profitable setup but it is the most efficient setup for a hobby miner with a threadripper they want to play around with and not overheat.
I plan to buy another 3900x and 3950x once the 3950 are in stock .
Why? For 1 dollar per day?
I got a R 9 3900x up to 13.15 KH temp at 66c mining rx,it did out of the box with 3200 speed memory 11 KH so i bought some 3600 memory because of something i saw on YouTube, I'm sure i can get it up to 14 kh easy once i get a better cooler.
I also have a r 7 2700 up to 4.71 kh due to memory limits, I have some 3600 speed sticks coming.
i also have a r7 1700 that does about the same as the r7 2700
and a r7 3700x i haven't really booted up yet the motherboard board and memory is due in today.
I plan to buy another 3900x and 3950x once the 3950 are in stock .
I also have a r 7 2700 up to 4.71 kh due to memory limits, I have some 3600 speed sticks coming.
i also have a r7 1700 that does about the same as the r7 2700
and a r7 3700x i haven't really booted up yet the motherboard board and memory is due in today.
I plan to buy another 3900x and 3950x once the 3950 are in stock .
randomX has been a bust so far , i cant see this many cpu farms active , botnets or fpgas , back to square O
About 600 MH was added to the network...thats like 40k 3900x. I would say half the new hash is from existing systems mining monero since they can, so 10-20k "new" systems in farms is not that much considering 100s of thousands of ASICs on other networks.
I think it is so high cause most of the miners have CPU which are sitting idle, so it makes sence even to put on a celeron which does no harm to earn extra few cents. Still ROI is better then mining any other coin with GPU.
I tested this RagerX yesterday and it was slower than XMRig on my R7 3700X. 8200 h/s RagerX vs 8450 h/s XMRig (all stock 3700X with tuned memory).
you guys should check out this new pool http://get-monero.org if you do not mind using my affiliate link or check out RagerX.lol if you do.
The out of the box hashrate for RagerX is 11500 (about 1000H/s faster) without any tweaks. (with tweaks should be faster)
here is the tele for the pool https://t.me/ragerxlol
3.5% pool fee but the new pool miner combo is 10% faster then all current mining software so you are still 6.5% up on every other miner.
Also the more friends you get to mine the more rewards you will also get paid out from the pool fee.
nice attempt to hide real scam site behind a link get-monero - but NO (cookies has been deleted)! The out of the box hashrate for RagerX is 11500 (about 1000H/s faster) without any tweaks. (with tweaks should be faster)
here is the tele for the pool https://t.me/ragerxlol
3.5% pool fee but the new pool miner combo is 10% faster then all current mining software so you are still 6.5% up on every other miner.
Also the more friends you get to mine the more rewards you will also get paid out from the pool fee.
Who do you think you are and why do you shy to link an original site (scam alert or not)?
http://get-monero.org is what i'm using as a shortner for my affiliate link for the mining pool the link is ragerX.lol which i also provided for people who do not wish to use my affiliate.
so what are you on about or do you believe no one can code a better pool or mining software then what is currently available?
you guys should check out this new pool http://get-monero.org if you do not mind using my affiliate link or check out RagerX.lol if you do.
The out of the box hashrate for RagerX is 11500 (about 1000H/s faster) without any tweaks. (with tweaks should be faster)
here is the tele for the pool https://t.me/ragerxlol
3.5% pool fee but the new pool miner combo is 10% faster then all current mining software so you are still 6.5% up on every other miner.
Also the more friends you get to mine the more rewards you will also get paid out from the pool fee.
nice attempt to hide real scam site behind a link get-monero - but NO (cookies has been deleted)! The out of the box hashrate for RagerX is 11500 (about 1000H/s faster) without any tweaks. (with tweaks should be faster)
here is the tele for the pool https://t.me/ragerxlol
3.5% pool fee but the new pool miner combo is 10% faster then all current mining software so you are still 6.5% up on every other miner.
Also the more friends you get to mine the more rewards you will also get paid out from the pool fee.
Who do you think you are and why do you shy to link an original site (scam alert or not)?
you guys should check out this new pool http://get-monero.org if you do not mind using my affiliate link or check out RagerX.lol if you do.
The out of the box hashrate for RagerX is 11500 (about 1000H/s faster) without any tweaks. (with tweaks should be faster)
here is the tele for the pool https://t.me/ragerxlol
3.5% pool fee but the new pool miner combo is 10% faster then all current mining software so you are still 6.5% up on every other miner.
Also the more friends you get to mine the more rewards you will also get paid out from the pool fee.
The out of the box hashrate for RagerX is 11500 (about 1000H/s faster) without any tweaks. (with tweaks should be faster)
here is the tele for the pool https://t.me/ragerxlol
3.5% pool fee but the new pool miner combo is 10% faster then all current mining software so you are still 6.5% up on every other miner.
Also the more friends you get to mine the more rewards you will also get paid out from the pool fee.
I was able to get the hash rate up up to 9300 h/s on a threadripper 1950x with a small jump in memory speeds up from 3200 to 3333 with stock cpu settings. The heat generated even with the cpu fan running full blast seems a bit much, so I will probably run with less cores until I can get it to and acceptable level.
considering monero is the only popular coin that can be mined using the cpu, no wonder why so many cpus were added to the network.
randomX has been a bust so far , i cant see this many cpu farms active , botnets or fpgas , back to square O
About 600 MH was added to the network...thats like 40k 3900x. I would say half the new hash is from existing systems mining monero since they can, so 10-20k "new" systems in farms is not that much considering 100s of thousands of ASICs on other networks.
I am getting around 4600 h/s on RandomX with a threadripper 1950x with 32 gb of ram at 3200 in a quad channel setup. Looks like faster dual channel memory has a bigger impact than the quad channel setup.
14 threads seems to be the sweet spot
14 threads seems to be the sweet spot
What miner are you using? I guess shouldnt really matter xmrig/xmrstak preety much same hashrate
I dont get how you can get so low hashrate, hmm have you set large pages and that miner allocate it correctly? so it shows like "JIT 1020/1020" and not "JIT 20/1020"
You should have double hashrate then what you have.
My 12 core TR1920x does 7500 h/s with 3200 cl 16 and 16gb quad channel memory (4x4)gb this @ 3,7ghz cpu and 1.15v
So yeah something strange with your setup man, if you have popped in the wrong memory slots eg A1 B1 etc etc ... Correct placement in your manual.
Also could you link your batch file with cpu affinity / threads.
If you could make a batch file in xmrig folder and do this :
Code:
@echo off
xmrig.exe, -o PoolUrl, -u YourWalletadress.Workername, -t 16, --cpu-affinity 0x55555555, --cpu-priority 5, -l, --log-file=Troubleshooting
pause
I ended up bumping up the large page files to 2048 in linux after reading the results you are getting with a 1920x and I am now getting close to 9000 h/s which is a major bump. I think I may be able to get more from what I am reading from other users by increasing the page file size with quad channel memory. Thanks for the feedback and tips, it helped me almost double my original results
I am getting around 4600 h/s on RandomX with a threadripper 1950x with 32 gb of ram at 3200 in a quad channel setup. Looks like faster dual channel memory has a bigger impact than the quad channel setup.
14 threads seems to be the sweet spot
14 threads seems to be the sweet spot
What miner are you using? I guess shouldnt really matter xmrig/xmrstak preety much same hashrate
I dont get how you can get so low hashrate, hmm have you set large pages and that miner allocate it correctly? so it shows like "JIT 1020/1020" and not "JIT 20/1020"
You should have double hashrate then what you have.
My 12 core TR1920x does 7500 h/s with 3200 cl 16 and 16gb quad channel memory (4x4)gb this @ 3,7ghz cpu and 1.15v
So yeah something strange with your setup man, if you have popped in the wrong memory slots eg A1 B1 etc etc ... Correct placement in your manual.
Also could you link your batch file with cpu affinity / threads.
If you could make a batch file in xmrig folder and do this :
Code:
@echo off
xmrig.exe, -o PoolUrl, -u YourWalletadress.Workername, -t 16, --cpu-affinity 0x55555555, --cpu-priority 5, -l, --log-file=Troubleshooting
pause
randomX has been a bust so far , i cant see this many cpu farms active , botnets or fpgas , back to square O
I don't know. My 3 systems hashrate went up 4x with less power.
Network hashrate tripled.
I am getting around 4600 h/s on RandomX with a threadripper 1950x with 32 gb of ram at 3200 in a quad channel setup. Looks like faster dual channel memory has a bigger impact than the quad channel setup.
14 threads seems to be the sweet spot
14 threads seems to be the sweet spot
randomX has been a bust so far , i cant see this many cpu farms active , botnets or fpgas , back to square O
Mining a CN/R coin like Lethean gives no trouble at all.
It was mining it until now. But I want my 4300 H/s monero hashrate from it.
It was mining it until now. But I want my 4300 H/s monero hashrate from it.
Supposedly you need to turn off Opcache in bios
Does that go for another name? Can't see that option.
It's a Gigabyte B450M DS3H.
Common options Then AMD CBS/CPU
So i belive its in the M.I.T section.
Then go to Advanced CPU core section
Then Opcache control, Then just disable
i wonder how it is in the taichi x399 board.
i think i did it correctly but i am not at 6000 or 7000 with. my thread ripper 1920x. i am doing 4900-5100
which is better then the 600 i was doing. i used a different option something like cbs/cpu
If it runs, but slow, memory timings should be the problem.
I was getting 10500 with my 3900x, and after following advice here, it's now @ 13500 H/s...
Why don't you have any new RandomX miner in your shop yet? How much is some miner with a few AMD Ryzen 9 CPUs and all the other components needed to plug and play a miner and mine something?
I am not sure how profitable is it to mine Monero at all with the current difficulty 101 G.
I am not sure how profitable is it to mine Monero at all with the current difficulty 101 G.
Mining a CN/R coin like Lethean gives no trouble at all.
It was mining it until now. But I want my 4300 H/s monero hashrate from it.
It was mining it until now. But I want my 4300 H/s monero hashrate from it.
Supposedly you need to turn off Opcache in bios
Does that go for another name? Can't see that option.
It's a Gigabyte B450M DS3H.
Common options Then AMD CBS/CPU
So i belive its in the M.I.T section.
Then go to Advanced CPU core section
Then Opcache control, Then just disable
i wonder how it is in the taichi x399 board.
i think i did it correctly but i am not at 6000 or 7000 with. my thread ripper 1920x. i am doing 4900-5100
which is better then the 600 i was doing. i used a different option something like cbs/cpu
Mining a CN/R coin like Lethean gives no trouble at all.
It was mining it until now. But I want my 4300 H/s monero hashrate from it.
It was mining it until now. But I want my 4300 H/s monero hashrate from it.
Supposedly you need to turn off Opcache in bios
Does that go for another name? Can't see that option.
It's a Gigabyte B450M DS3H.
Common options Then AMD CBS/CPU
So i belive its in the M.I.T section.
Then go to Advanced CPU core section
Then Opcache control, Then just disable
OK, I found it and disabled, and it solved the problem.
At least XMRig started fine and didn't exit until now, without the need to launch ryzen master and fiddling with settings.
Thanks!
Np man! I had this happen to me yesterday but on a ryzen 5 3600.
So i was changing profile in ryzen master, suddenly no miner program would run, resetted ryzen master and it was ok. So yeah can happen strange things.
Mining a CN/R coin like Lethean gives no trouble at all.
It was mining it until now. But I want my 4300 H/s monero hashrate from it.
It was mining it until now. But I want my 4300 H/s monero hashrate from it.
Supposedly you need to turn off Opcache in bios
Does that go for another name? Can't see that option.
It's a Gigabyte B450M DS3H.
Common options Then AMD CBS/CPU
So i belive its in the M.I.T section.
Then go to Advanced CPU core section
Then Opcache control, Then just disable
OK, I found it and disabled, and it solved the problem.
At least XMRig started fine and didn't exit until now, without the need to launch ryzen master and fiddling with settings.
Thanks!
yeah all three 3900x are working.
but my threadripper is like fuck you any help would be nice.
but my threadripper is like fuck you any help would be nice.
I'll try it.
But since yesterday I got it running, don't know why. It has something to do with Ryzen Master being on.
Now, this is a weird behaviour, it's mining without a hiccup 8 treads @ 4300 H/s for 14h now...
And it's definitely something with hardware setting, the other Ryzen 1700 has exact same motherboard and memories, and I did clone its hard drive and booted it on the uncooperating Ryzen Machine. It displayed the same behaviour, exited a couple seconds after it started mining, with same OS, settings and XMRig config that works on the other machine.
But since yesterday I got it running, don't know why. It has something to do with Ryzen Master being on.
Now, this is a weird behaviour, it's mining without a hiccup 8 treads @ 4300 H/s for 14h now...
And it's definitely something with hardware setting, the other Ryzen 1700 has exact same motherboard and memories, and I did clone its hard drive and booted it on the uncooperating Ryzen Machine. It displayed the same behaviour, exited a couple seconds after it started mining, with same OS, settings and XMRig config that works on the other machine.
Mining a CN/R coin like Lethean gives no trouble at all.
It was mining it until now. But I want my 4300 H/s monero hashrate from it.
It was mining it until now. But I want my 4300 H/s monero hashrate from it.
Supposedly you need to turn off Opcache in bios
Does that go for another name? Can't see that option.
It's a Gigabyte B450M DS3H.
Common options Then AMD CBS/CPU
So i belive its in the M.I.T section.
Then go to Advanced CPU core section
Then Opcache control, Then just disable
Mining a CN/R coin like Lethean gives no trouble at all.
It was mining it until now. But I want my 4300 H/s monero hashrate from it.
It was mining it until now. But I want my 4300 H/s monero hashrate from it.
Supposedly you need to turn off Opcache in bios
Does that go for another name? Can't see that option.
It's a Gigabyte B450M DS3H.
Mining a CN/R coin like Lethean gives no trouble at all.
It was mining it until now. But I want my 4300 H/s monero hashrate from it.
It was mining it until now. But I want my 4300 H/s monero hashrate from it.
Supposedly you need to turn off Opcache in bios
Quote
https://blog.nicehash.com/post/how-to-limit-threads-on-the-cpu
...
NiceHash miner uses two different CPU miners.
XmrStak
XMRig
XMRig
To limit threads when mining with XMRig you have to follow these steps:
Open Benchmark tab
Select your CPU device and XMRig
Look for Extra Launch Parameters text-box and write --threads=N where N is a number of threads you want to use. Example to use 8 threads: --threads=8
...
...
NiceHash miner uses two different CPU miners.
XmrStak
XMRig
XMRig
To limit threads when mining with XMRig you have to follow these steps:
Open Benchmark tab
Select your CPU device and XMRig
Look for Extra Launch Parameters text-box and write --threads=N where N is a number of threads you want to use. Example to use 8 threads: --threads=8
...
any using nice hash and limiting threads?
Mining a CN/R coin like Lethean gives no trouble at all.
It was mining it until now. But I want my 4300 H/s monero hashrate from it.
It was mining it until now. But I want my 4300 H/s monero hashrate from it.
Help me here on a most weird problem.
I have a Ryzen 1700 machine, with 16 Gb RAM and 3 Ellesmere cards that refuses to mine RandomX.
It already mined it fine, then XMrig and xmr-stak just exited.
I thought it was a config problem, so I copied the config.json and edited address and walet and it started mining it no problems at all.
Today I rebooted because a card wasn't sending shares, and now I can't mine.
It just exits, sometimes sends one or 2 shares and then exits.
Log file reads
No warning, no nothing.
XMR-stak displays a similar behaviour.
I disabled Windows antivirus, added an exclusion to folder, system is stable, I tested with memtest and prime 95.
I have one more 1700 and a 3900x and it works just fine, no issues.
I have a Ryzen 1700 machine, with 16 Gb RAM and 3 Ellesmere cards that refuses to mine RandomX.
It already mined it fine, then XMrig and xmr-stak just exited.
I thought it was a config problem, so I copied the config.json and edited address and walet and it started mining it no problems at all.
Today I rebooted because a card wasn't sending shares, and now I can't mine.
It just exits, sometimes sends one or 2 shares and then exits.
Log file reads
Quote
* ABOUT XMRig/5.1.0 gcc/9.2.0
* LIBS libuv/1.31.0 OpenSSL/1.1.1c hwloc/2.0.4
* HUGE PAGES permission granted
* CPU AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor (1) x64 AES
L2:4.0 MB L3:16.0 MB 8C/16T NUMA:1
* MEMORY 2.0/15.9 GB (12%)
* DONATE 1%
* ASSEMBLY auto:ryzen
* POOL #1 pool.supportxmr.com:3333 algo auto
* COMMANDS hashrate, pause, resume
* OPENCL disabled
* CUDA disabled
[2019-12-01 13:57:57.736] net use pool pool.supportxmr.com:3333 94.23.23.52
[2019-12-01 13:57:57.736] net new job from pool.supportxmr.com:3333 diff 50000 algo rx/0 height 1979267
[2019-12-01 13:57:57.736] rx init dataset algo rx/0 (16 threads) seed 993ba25f61d47e1e...
[2019-12-01 13:57:57.736] rx allocated 2336 MB (2080+256) huge pages 100% 1168/1168 +JIT (5 ms)
[2019-12-01 13:58:00.689] rx dataset ready (2955 ms)
[2019-12-01 13:58:00.689] cpu use profile rx (8 threads) scratchpad 2048 KB
[2019-12-01 13:58:00.908] cpu READY threads 8/8 ( huge pages 100% 8/8 memory 16384 KB (206 ms)
* LIBS libuv/1.31.0 OpenSSL/1.1.1c hwloc/2.0.4
* HUGE PAGES permission granted
* CPU AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor (1) x64 AES
L2:4.0 MB L3:16.0 MB 8C/16T NUMA:1
* MEMORY 2.0/15.9 GB (12%)
* DONATE 1%
* ASSEMBLY auto:ryzen
* POOL #1 pool.supportxmr.com:3333 algo auto
* COMMANDS hashrate, pause, resume
* OPENCL disabled
* CUDA disabled
[2019-12-01 13:57:57.736] net use pool pool.supportxmr.com:3333 94.23.23.52
[2019-12-01 13:57:57.736] net new job from pool.supportxmr.com:3333 diff 50000 algo rx/0 height 1979267
[2019-12-01 13:57:57.736] rx init dataset algo rx/0 (16 threads) seed 993ba25f61d47e1e...
[2019-12-01 13:57:57.736] rx allocated 2336 MB (2080+256) huge pages 100% 1168/1168 +JIT (5 ms)
[2019-12-01 13:58:00.689] rx dataset ready (2955 ms)
[2019-12-01 13:58:00.689] cpu use profile rx (8 threads) scratchpad 2048 KB
[2019-12-01 13:58:00.908] cpu READY threads 8/8 (
huge pages 100% 8/8 memory 16384 KB (206 ms)No warning, no nothing.
XMR-stak displays a similar behaviour.
I disabled Windows antivirus, added an exclusion to folder, system is stable, I tested with memtest and prime 95.
I have one more 1700 and a 3900x and it works just fine, no issues.
It would be intresting with some cooling numbers on the wraith prism . Max fan Speed 2750rpm and Then if you could flip switch on cooler so that Max 3750rpm (turbo cooling)
I'd get the cooler master aio if I were to build a Ryzen rig. I'm pretty sure the things aren't durable though. I just don't trust AIOs. But then again, if they manage to do their thing for two years it'd still be acceptable.
Seems stable for now after almost 24h, with a little bump of memory voltage.
Tomorrow it'll start to shine with RandomX
What cooling you using, is it the stock air cooler?Tomorrow it'll start to shine with RandomX
How much you pulling power from the wall?
No, as I said, do not mine with 3900x with stock cooler. I'm using a Cooler Master MasterLiquid 240, mid range AIO, but it keeps the CPU 20ºc cooler than stock cooler.
It's pulling 520W at the wall, CPU + 2 Vegas 56 mining cryptonight_r.
Power supply is an Enermax Triathlor 1000W.
yeah that is the bargain cooler.
i have four cpus.
i use the corsair 280 aio it is the best
i use the fractal 240 aio
i. use the evga 240 aio
i use the cooler master aio 240
the corsair is the coolest
the other three are about the same. and the cooler master is 30 dollars less.
Agree. However it was cheap and it's a world of difference from the stock cooler.
Seems stable for now after almost 24h, with a little bump of memory voltage.
Tomorrow it'll start to shine with RandomX
What cooling you using, is it the stock air cooler?Tomorrow it'll start to shine with RandomX
How much you pulling power from the wall?
No, as I said, do not mine with 3900x with stock cooler. I'm using a Cooler Master MasterLiquid 240, mid range AIO, but it keeps the CPU 20ºc cooler than stock cooler.
It's pulling 520W at the wall, CPU + 2 Vegas 56 mining cryptonight_r.
Power supply is an Enermax Triathlor 1000W.
yeah that is the bargain cooler.
i have four cpus.
i use the corsair 280 aio it is the best
i use the fractal 240 aio
i. use the evga 240 aio
i use the cooler master aio 240
the corsair is the coolest
the other three are about the same. and the cooler master is 30 dollars less.
Seems stable for now after almost 24h, with a little bump of memory voltage.
Tomorrow it'll start to shine with RandomX
What cooling you using, is it the stock air cooler?Tomorrow it'll start to shine with RandomX
How much you pulling power from the wall?
No, as I said, do not mine with 3900x with stock cooler. I'm using a Cooler Master MasterLiquid 240, mid range AIO, but it keeps the CPU 20ºc cooler than stock cooler.
It's pulling 520W at the wall, CPU + 2 Vegas 56 mining cryptonight_r.
Power supply is an Enermax Triathlor 1000W.
Seems stable for now after almost 24h, with a little bump of memory voltage.
Tomorrow it'll start to shine with RandomX
What cooling you using, is it the stock air cooler?Tomorrow it'll start to shine with RandomX
How much you pulling power from the wall?
Seems stable for now after almost 24h, with a little bump of memory voltage.
Tomorrow it'll start to shine with RandomX
Tomorrow it'll start to shine with RandomX
Wow. Thanks a lot.
I did it and now RandomX benchmark hits 13300 H/s. Me happy.
Now let's see if it's stable 24/7.
I did it and now RandomX benchmark hits 13300 H/s. Me happy.
Now let's see if it's stable 24/7.
Well done
Monero hasn't forked to RandomX yet, buddy
I know, man, I'm still mining cryptonight_r with CPU, 1500 h/s not to shabby.
Monero hasn't forked to RandomX yet, buddy
Nopes, it isn't.
Reboots after a couple hours mining monero.
Let's try a bit more voltage.
Reboots after a couple hours mining monero.
Let's try a bit more voltage.
Wow. Thanks a lot.
I did it and now RandomX benchmark hits 13300 H/s. Me happy.
Now let's see if it's stable 24/7.
I did it and now RandomX benchmark hits 13300 H/s. Me happy.
Now let's see if it's stable 24/7.
tRFC=631 is very very bad timing. tRFC is crucial for high hashrate, most good results I've seen use tRFC=300 or less. Just use Ryzen DRAM calculator with fast preset to get better timings and set _all_ timings it shows you.
I used a tighter timings profile in the bios (MSI X570-A Pro) and result is the same.
~11k, 24 threads.
Timings are:
Dram frequency 1800 Mhz
FSB:DRAM 5:54
CL 14
tRCD 16
tRP 16
tRAS 36
tRC 84
tRFC 631
CR 1T
DIMM voltage is 1,472
I though DDR4-3600 @ 14-16-16-36 timings was pretty fast RAM, but apparently I'm wrong.
~11k, 24 threads.
Timings are:
Dram frequency 1800 Mhz
FSB:DRAM 5:54
CL 14
tRCD 16
tRP 16
tRAS 36
tRC 84
tRFC 631
CR 1T
DIMM voltage is 1,472
I though DDR4-3600 @ 14-16-16-36 timings was pretty fast RAM, but apparently I'm wrong.
I set my Corsair Vengeance to 3633 Mhz @ 16-17-17-34-50 timings.
Not great performance, though. 11000 H/s.
What am I doing wrong?
Not great performance, though. 11000 H/s.
What am I doing wrong?
What are the voltages?
Not sure about your timimngs
Watercool your 3900x.
I went from 85ºc with stock cooler with lots of fans and open case to ~64ºc with watercooling, plus + 166 Mhz boost for free. No overclocking.
I wouldn't be confortable runnig a CPU @ 85ºc 24/7. It will fail, sooner or later.
I went from 85ºc with stock cooler with lots of fans and open case to ~64ºc with watercooling, plus + 166 Mhz boost for free. No overclocking.
I wouldn't be confortable runnig a CPU @ 85ºc 24/7. It will fail, sooner or later.
Seems like a option, i wont be running it over 80c in any case. I rather then reduce the clock peed and voltages.
And why would you run your RAM @ CL 26? 
that`s the Q to asus-support and to bios-makers from asia (why the default is so ugly)
I set my Corsair Vengeance to 3633 Mhz @ 16-17-17-34-50 timings.
Not great performance, though. 11000 H/s.
What am I doing wrong?
Not great performance, though. 11000 H/s.
What am I doing wrong?
And why would you run your RAM @ CL 26?
Ok, that makes sense.
I still haven't tuned memory timings.
I have 2x8GB Corsair Vengeance RGB 16GB DDR4-3466MHz CL16 (CMR16GX4M2C3466C16)
Memory runs fine @ 3466 spec and higher (but it starts to relax timings).
Anyone knows what memory dies brand are in this?
3700X @4GHz:I still haven't tuned memory timings.
I have 2x8GB Corsair Vengeance RGB 16GB DDR4-3466MHz CL16 (CMR16GX4M2C3466C16)
Memory runs fine @ 3466 spec and higher (but it starts to relax timings).
Anyone knows what memory dies brand are in this?
DDR4 3600MHz auto (CL26) - 6.8Khs
DDR4 3600MHz tuned (CL16) - 8.4Khs
+23.5% - because of tuned RAM
UPD 28/11/2019: decr. trfc from 345 to 278 gives +150h/s, so it pushes 8550h/s so far
Ok, that makes sense.
I still haven't tuned memory timings.
I have 2x8GB Corsair Vengeance RGB 16GB DDR4-3466MHz CL16 (CMR16GX4M2C3466C16)
Memory runs fine @ 3466 spec and higher (but it starts to relax timings).
Anyone knows what memory dies brand are in this?
I still haven't tuned memory timings.
I have 2x8GB Corsair Vengeance RGB 16GB DDR4-3466MHz CL16 (CMR16GX4M2C3466C16)
Memory runs fine @ 3466 spec and higher (but it starts to relax timings).
Anyone knows what memory dies brand are in this?
On another topic, why is system RAM speeds so important for RamdomX?
Isn't it supposed to run on L2/L3 cache, and that's why it performs so well on Ryzen's?
Because it uses 2 GB dataset in system RAM. Isn't it supposed to run on L2/L3 cache, and that's why it performs so well on Ryzen's?
On another topic, why is system RAM speeds so important for RamdomX?
Isn't it supposed to run on L2/L3 cache, and that's why it performs so well on Ryzen's?
Isn't it supposed to run on L2/L3 cache, and that's why it performs so well on Ryzen's?
Watercool your 3900x.
I went from 85ºc with stock cooler with lots of fans and open case to ~64ºc with watercooling, plus + 166 Mhz boost for free. No overclocking.
I wouldn't be confortable runnig a CPU @ 85ºc 24/7. It will fail, sooner or later.
I went from 85ºc with stock cooler with lots of fans and open case to ~64ºc with watercooling, plus + 166 Mhz boost for free. No overclocking.
I wouldn't be confortable runnig a CPU @ 85ºc 24/7. It will fail, sooner or later.
It will be used for mining also.
My plan of this setup is.
MSI B450 Tomahawk max motherboard
2x3600mhz ram
2xRX5700
Ryzen 9 3900x
So not to waste other hardware i can do dual mining for example with GPU i mine ETH.
Also can use it as gaming and rendering bench.
In such a way you are getting not a rig but a serious worstation that you can use in any way: for games, for mining, for work. If you will use it only for mining ROI would be really huge. Its nice decision. My plan of this setup is.
MSI B450 Tomahawk max motherboard
2x3600mhz ram
2xRX5700
Ryzen 9 3900x
So not to waste other hardware i can do dual mining for example with GPU i mine ETH.
Also can use it as gaming and rendering bench.
It will be used for mining also.
My plan of this setup is.
MSI B450 Tomahawk max motherboard
2x3600mhz ram
2xRX5700
Ryzen 9 3900x
So not to waste other hardware i can do dual mining for example with GPU i mine ETH.
Also can use it as gaming and rendering bench.
My plan of this setup is.
MSI B450 Tomahawk max motherboard
2x3600mhz ram
2xRX5700
Ryzen 9 3900x
So not to waste other hardware i can do dual mining for example with GPU i mine ETH.
Also can use it as gaming and rendering bench.
Thanks for taking the time to put together this information, it really helps when deciding if its worth using these to mine or just get one for a kick-butt editing system. Memory seems to have a big impact on RandomX so I will be interested to see how it impacts the hash rate. It makes me wonder what kind of impact the new Threadrippers with quad channel memory will have on mining performance compared to dual channel.
Thank you for feedback3rd generation Treadripper should be out soon, havent really followed they release date. Price range seems attractive.
It would be great if we would get some dual CPU boards for them.
At the end of it it will come to price per hash 🤞
Thanks for taking the time to put together this information, it really helps when deciding if its worth using these to mine or just get one for a kick-butt editing system. Memory seems to have a big impact on RandomX so I will be interested to see how it impacts the hash rate. It makes me wonder what kind of impact the new Threadrippers with quad channel memory will have on mining performance compared to dual channel.
1xRX5700 for image
nice GPU "for image" anything over 80c will destroy your cpu in a few months
If you have several CPU, you can exchange them under warranty. I think you can get the full price for several months of use.It always amazes me that some people would run the CPU/GPU hot rather
than run the fans hard. Fans are cheaper to replace, but I haven't had one fail
yet in 5 years, Just clean them regularly.
I think the same. I have now 4 GPUs with 120mm fans that looks bad but works normally than run the fans hard. Fans are cheaper to replace, but I haven't had one fail
yet in 5 years, Just clean them regularly.
It always amazes me that some people would run the CPU/GPU hot rather
than run the fans hard. Fans are cheaper to replace, but I haven't had one fail
yet in 5 years, Just clean them regularly.
as long as you dont go higher than manufacture's maximum rpm then is okay,than run the fans hard. Fans are cheaper to replace, but I haven't had one fail
yet in 5 years, Just clean them regularly.
A GPU a fan failure under warantee should be covered regardless. A failure
of a 3rd party CPU cooler could be blamed on the mobo for overdriving it.
I have my fan curves set for 80% @ 70C rising to 100% @ 80C. The cooler algos
(and cooler weather) don't run the fans as hard.
It always amazes me that some people would run the CPU/GPU hot rather
than run the fans hard. Fans are cheaper to replace, but I haven't had one fail
yet in 5 years, Just clean them regularly.
as long as you dont go higher than manufacture's maximum rpm then is okay,than run the fans hard. Fans are cheaper to replace, but I haven't had one fail
yet in 5 years, Just clean them regularly.
A GPU a fan failure under warantee should be covered regardless. A failure
of a 3rd party CPU cooler could be blamed on the mobo for overdriving it.
I have my fan curves set for 80% @ 70C rising to 100% @ 80C. The cooler algos
(and cooler weather) don't run the fans as hard.
It always amazes me that some people would run the CPU/GPU hot rather
than run the fans hard. Fans are cheaper to replace, but I haven't had one fail
yet in 5 years, Just clean them regularly.
than run the fans hard. Fans are cheaper to replace, but I haven't had one fail
yet in 5 years, Just clean them regularly.
as long as you dont go higher than manufacture's maximum rpm then is okay, 24/7, 85% maximum i would go for. I do agree, if needed i would even 100% for few hours.
It always amazes me that some people would run the CPU/GPU hot rather
than run the fans hard. Fans are cheaper to replace, but I haven't had one fail
yet in 5 years, Just clean them regularly.
than run the fans hard. Fans are cheaper to replace, but I haven't had one fail
yet in 5 years, Just clean them regularly.
Well. Here is my experiment with Ryzen 9 3900X.
Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X.
Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO.
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4 3200 CL14 XMP 2.0 ( F4-3200C14D-16GVR ).
Air cooler: Bequiet Dark Rock Pro4.
AIO cooler: EVGA CLC 280
PSU: Corsair HX1200i.
Out of box: 10500 hash/s
Memory DRAM Calculator for Ryzen v1.6.2. https://www.techpowerup.com/download/ryzen-dram-calculator/
Processor: Ryzen 2 gen
Memory Type: Samsung B-Die
Profile version: V1
Memory Rank: 2
Frequency (MT/s ): 3200
BCLK: 100
DIMM Modules: 2
Motherboard: X570
Calculate Fast.
Room temp: 23C
CPU: 4.0 Ghz @ 1.2V - 13150 hash/s @ 230W wall
Cooler:
Default cooler ( Wraith Prism): 90C
Dark Rock Pro 4: 75C
EVGA CLC 280: 67C ( 1200rpm fan )
CPU: 4.2 Ghz @ 1.25V - 13500 hash/s @ 280W wall
Default cooler ( Wraith Prism): +++ better dont try +++
Dark Rock Pro 4: 84C
EVGA CLC 280: 73C ( 1200rpm fan )
Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X.
Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO.
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4 3200 CL14 XMP 2.0 ( F4-3200C14D-16GVR ).
Air cooler: Bequiet Dark Rock Pro4.
AIO cooler: EVGA CLC 280
PSU: Corsair HX1200i.
Out of box: 10500 hash/s
Memory DRAM Calculator for Ryzen v1.6.2. https://www.techpowerup.com/download/ryzen-dram-calculator/
Processor: Ryzen 2 gen
Memory Type: Samsung B-Die
Profile version: V1
Memory Rank: 2
Frequency (MT/s ): 3200
BCLK: 100
DIMM Modules: 2
Motherboard: X570
Calculate Fast.
Room temp: 23C
CPU: 4.0 Ghz @ 1.2V - 13150 hash/s @ 230W wall
Cooler:
Default cooler ( Wraith Prism): 90C
Dark Rock Pro 4: 75C
EVGA CLC 280: 67C ( 1200rpm fan )
CPU: 4.2 Ghz @ 1.25V - 13500 hash/s @ 280W wall
Default cooler ( Wraith Prism): +++ better dont try +++
Dark Rock Pro 4: 84C
EVGA CLC 280: 73C ( 1200rpm fan )
anything over 80c will destroy your cpu in a few months
My 3x ryzen 9 3900x all use water coolers.
I have an
evga cooler = https://www.amazon.com/EVGA-Liquid-Cooler-Cooling-400-HY-CL24-V1/dp/B074WH52BW/ref=sr_1_1?
corsair cooler = https://www.amazon.com/Radiator-Advanced-Lighting-Software-compatible/dp/B077G3C6HH/ref=sr_1_4?
fractal cooler = https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0719DHG5Y/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o05_s00?
yet to test
cool master cooler = https://www.amazon.com/Cooler-Master-MasterLiquid-Dissipation-MLW-D24M-A20PC-R1/dp/B075YPG52N/ref=sr_1_3?
and yes the corsair 280mm is best at 66C full speed
the evga 71c
the fractal 69c
around 1.25 to 1.3 core to allow for close to 13k hash . do you get 13000+ mhs on the water cooler?
Well. Here is my experiment with Ryzen 9 3900X.
Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X.
Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO.
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4 3200 CL14 XMP 2.0 ( F4-3200C14D-16GVR ).
Air cooler: Bequiet Dark Rock Pro4.
AIO cooler: EVGA CLC 280
PSU: Corsair HX1200i.
Out of box: 10500 hash/s
Memory DRAM Calculator for Ryzen v1.6.2. https://www.techpowerup.com/download/ryzen-dram-calculator/
Processor: Ryzen 2 gen
Memory Type: Samsung B-Die
Profile version: V1
Memory Rank: 2
Frequency (MT/s ): 3200
BCLK: 100
DIMM Modules: 2
Motherboard: X570
Calculate Fast.
Room temp: 23C
CPU: 4.0 Ghz @ 1.2V - 13150 hash/s @ 230W wall
Cooler:
Default cooler ( Wraith Prism): 90C
Dark Rock Pro 4: 75C
EVGA CLC 280: 67C ( 1200rpm fan )
CPU: 4.2 Ghz @ 1.25V - 13500 hash/s @ 280W wall
Default cooler ( Wraith Prism): +++ better dont try +++
Dark Rock Pro 4: 84C
EVGA CLC 280: 73C ( 1200rpm fan )
Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X.
Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO.
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4 3200 CL14 XMP 2.0 ( F4-3200C14D-16GVR ).
Air cooler: Bequiet Dark Rock Pro4.
AIO cooler: EVGA CLC 280
PSU: Corsair HX1200i.
Out of box: 10500 hash/s
Memory DRAM Calculator for Ryzen v1.6.2. https://www.techpowerup.com/download/ryzen-dram-calculator/
Processor: Ryzen 2 gen
Memory Type: Samsung B-Die
Profile version: V1
Memory Rank: 2
Frequency (MT/s ): 3200
BCLK: 100
DIMM Modules: 2
Motherboard: X570
Calculate Fast.
Room temp: 23C
CPU: 4.0 Ghz @ 1.2V - 13150 hash/s @ 230W wall
Cooler:
Default cooler ( Wraith Prism): 90C
Dark Rock Pro 4: 75C
EVGA CLC 280: 67C ( 1200rpm fan )
CPU: 4.2 Ghz @ 1.25V - 13500 hash/s @ 280W wall
Default cooler ( Wraith Prism): +++ better dont try +++
Dark Rock Pro 4: 84C
EVGA CLC 280: 73C ( 1200rpm fan )
anything over 80c will destroy your cpu in a few months
My 3x ryzen 9 3900x all use water coolers.
I have an
evga cooler = https://www.amazon.com/EVGA-Liquid-Cooler-Cooling-400-HY-CL24-V1/dp/B074WH52BW/ref=sr_1_1?
corsair cooler = https://www.amazon.com/Radiator-Advanced-Lighting-Software-compatible/dp/B077G3C6HH/ref=sr_1_4?
fractal cooler = https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0719DHG5Y/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o05_s00?
yet to test
cool master cooler = https://www.amazon.com/Cooler-Master-MasterLiquid-Dissipation-MLW-D24M-A20PC-R1/dp/B075YPG52N/ref=sr_1_3?
and yes the corsair 280mm is best at 66C full speed
the evga 71c
the fractal 69c
Well. Here is my experiment with Ryzen 9 3900X.
Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X.
Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO.
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4 3200 CL14 XMP 2.0 ( F4-3200C14D-16GVR ).
Air cooler: Bequiet Dark Rock Pro4.
AIO cooler: EVGA CLC 280
PSU: Corsair HX1200i.
Out of box: 10500 hash/s
Memory DRAM Calculator for Ryzen v1.6.2. https://www.techpowerup.com/download/ryzen-dram-calculator/
Processor: Ryzen 2 gen
Memory Type: Samsung B-Die
Profile version: V1
Memory Rank: 2
Frequency (MT/s ): 3200
BCLK: 100
DIMM Modules: 2
Motherboard: X570
Calculate Fast.
Room temp: 23C
CPU: 4.0 Ghz @ 1.2V - 13150 hash/s @ 230W wall
Cooler:
Default cooler ( Wraith Prism): 90C
Dark Rock Pro 4: 75C
EVGA CLC 280: 67C ( 1200rpm fan )
CPU: 4.2 Ghz @ 1.25V - 13500 hash/s @ 280W wall
Default cooler ( Wraith Prism): +++ better dont try +++
Dark Rock Pro 4: 84C
EVGA CLC 280: 73C ( 1200rpm fan )
Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X.
Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO.
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4 3200 CL14 XMP 2.0 ( F4-3200C14D-16GVR ).
Air cooler: Bequiet Dark Rock Pro4.
AIO cooler: EVGA CLC 280
PSU: Corsair HX1200i.
Out of box: 10500 hash/s
Memory DRAM Calculator for Ryzen v1.6.2. https://www.techpowerup.com/download/ryzen-dram-calculator/
Processor: Ryzen 2 gen
Memory Type: Samsung B-Die
Profile version: V1
Memory Rank: 2
Frequency (MT/s ): 3200
BCLK: 100
DIMM Modules: 2
Motherboard: X570
Calculate Fast.
Room temp: 23C
CPU: 4.0 Ghz @ 1.2V - 13150 hash/s @ 230W wall
Cooler:
Default cooler ( Wraith Prism): 90C
Dark Rock Pro 4: 75C
EVGA CLC 280: 67C ( 1200rpm fan )
CPU: 4.2 Ghz @ 1.25V - 13500 hash/s @ 280W wall
Default cooler ( Wraith Prism): +++ better dont try +++
Dark Rock Pro 4: 84C
EVGA CLC 280: 73C ( 1200rpm fan )
anything over 80c will destroy your cpu in a few months
Well. Here is my experiment with Ryzen 9 3900X.
Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X.
Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO.
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4 3200 CL14 XMP 2.0 ( F4-3200C14D-16GVR ).
Air cooler: Bequiet Dark Rock Pro4.
AIO cooler: EVGA CLC 280
PSU: Corsair HX1200i.
Out of box: 10500 hash/s
Memory DRAM Calculator for Ryzen v1.6.2. https://www.techpowerup.com/download/ryzen-dram-calculator/
Processor: Ryzen 2 gen
Memory Type: Samsung B-Die
Profile version: V1
Memory Rank: 2
Frequency (MT/s ): 3200
BCLK: 100
DIMM Modules: 2
Motherboard: X570
Calculate Fast.
Room temp: 23C
CPU: 4.0 Ghz @ 1.2V - 13150 hash/s @ 230W wall
Cooler:
Default cooler ( Wraith Prism): 90C
Dark Rock Pro 4: 75C
EVGA CLC 280: 67C ( 1200rpm fan )
CPU: 4.2 Ghz @ 1.25V - 13500 hash/s @ 280W wall
Default cooler ( Wraith Prism): +++ better dont try +++
Dark Rock Pro 4: 84C
EVGA CLC 280: 73C ( 1200rpm fan )
Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X.
Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO.
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4 3200 CL14 XMP 2.0 ( F4-3200C14D-16GVR ).
Air cooler: Bequiet Dark Rock Pro4.
AIO cooler: EVGA CLC 280
PSU: Corsair HX1200i.
Out of box: 10500 hash/s
Memory DRAM Calculator for Ryzen v1.6.2. https://www.techpowerup.com/download/ryzen-dram-calculator/
Processor: Ryzen 2 gen
Memory Type: Samsung B-Die
Profile version: V1
Memory Rank: 2
Frequency (MT/s ): 3200
BCLK: 100
DIMM Modules: 2
Motherboard: X570
Calculate Fast.
Room temp: 23C
CPU: 4.0 Ghz @ 1.2V - 13150 hash/s @ 230W wall
Cooler:
Default cooler ( Wraith Prism): 90C
Dark Rock Pro 4: 75C
EVGA CLC 280: 67C ( 1200rpm fan )
CPU: 4.2 Ghz @ 1.25V - 13500 hash/s @ 280W wall
Default cooler ( Wraith Prism): +++ better dont try +++
Dark Rock Pro 4: 84C
EVGA CLC 280: 73C ( 1200rpm fan )
What are the temperatures like with the stock cooler?
I was using the stock cooler with R7 1700 and I managed to get it to run @ 3.9GHz all cores but the voltage was so high and the power draw that it consumed around 210W from the wall, Veg 56 GPU was idle and temperatures reached 80 C.
Temperatures was quite hot 83C after working for about 30 minutes. But my room temperature quite low about 15c.I was using the stock cooler with R7 1700 and I managed to get it to run @ 3.9GHz all cores but the voltage was so high and the power draw that it consumed around 210W from the wall, Veg 56 GPU was idle and temperatures reached 80 C.
This was just overall test, ill have more efficient ram by end of the week.
Need to find that sweet spot where you reduce core voltage and not loose to much hashrate. To not get the CPU to hot with stock aircooler.
What are the temperatures like with the stock cooler?
I was using the stock cooler with R7 1700 and I managed to get it to run @ 3.9GHz all cores but the voltage was so high and the power draw that it consumed around 210W from the wall, Veg 56 GPU was idle and temperatures reached 80 C.
I was using the stock cooler with R7 1700 and I managed to get it to run @ 3.9GHz all cores but the voltage was so high and the power draw that it consumed around 210W from the wall, Veg 56 GPU was idle and temperatures reached 80 C.
Looking sweet man!
GPU was idle yes. Quote
Power usage from wall is 260w.
is it with the gpu in idle?
Looking sweet man!
Quote
Power usage from wall is 260w.
is it with the gpu in idle? 
Test bench setup :
Ryzen 9 3900x with stock air cooler
2x Gskill 3000 16gb C15 RAM modules
MSI B450 Tomahawk MAX motherboard
1xRX5700 for image
Superflower 750w GOLD powersupply
As there are few of the coins switched to RandomX mining algorithm already and one of them is Loki. So on stock settings everything out of the box we where hashing Loki at 11500 h/s. Which is about 5x then in our previous best tests with Intel i7 8700k out of the box 2360 h/s. Power usage from wall is 260w.
So we tried to push little more speed on the Ryzen 9 CPU , by overclocking it in motherboard BIOS. Changes done :
OC Explore mode to expert
CPU OC ratio to 4100 mhz
A-XMP to enabled
Precision Boost Overdrive to disabled
Play with DRAM timings (lower the values)
CPU core voltage to 1.250v
Increased Dram voltage 1.300v
This setting got me up to 12650 h/s mining RandomX. I was playing around with different kind of ram stick , and seen significant mining performance decrease with lower performance ram. So i have on the way 4x3600mhz 8gb stick and will do a proper performance test when they arrive.
So the 12650 h/s if you would be available mine monero today would be 3.5 usd , even that it got 10% price drop today. But you know it is not the case, impossible to predict what kind of total network hashrate will be when Randomx launches. As the total network mining structure will change and the current hardware will be unprofitable. Current Monero network hashrate is around 300 mh/s.
Profitability with Ryzen 9 mining Loki which is also RandomX mining algorithm. Daily profitability is 0.70usd
Im eager to see what RandomX mining will bring to Monero mining. What is your thoughts?
Video Review - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SceQiG3jDE
Jump to: