Topic: [ANN] 🚀AngryToken 🚀 Open-source Decentralized Social Media 🌍🌍🌍📱📱📱 (Read 439 times)

THis project needs to verify and clear this statement. it says a lot about the Image of the project. also it was the first responds to this tread. they ought to address the community on behave of this message. we really need to know what happen to avoid accepting a one side story.

Thank You, I will take a look.

We will use our own servers for storage and computation in the beginning, since we will not have a lot of user/traffic. But once the platform starts expanding and the technology will be more reliable we will use users computers, and our servers will be used as backup nodes.

You have written. "Both of these systems will be decentralized, which will allow creators to publish content without
central authority imposes its will or sucks all income "The question is the following. Will your servers be used as a server for your news? If you use users' computers, it will not be effective.

Hohoho..Im Santa Claus....
Its very intresting, but not vor us...

You will start coin???

Just to be open and clear Mr. Dviola started working with us on the 20th of August 2018. He was on a 4 month trial working on our project before he would've been fully committed. He has been tagging us in every social media and also now on bitcointalk claiming that we are dishonest and hypocritical and he is claiming that we never paid him. We will upload details of what actually happened and you can be the judge.

The payment schedule for his 4 month trial was supposed to be as follows:
1st month= $500 paid in BTC
2nd month= $600 paid in BTC
3rd month= $700 paid in BTC
4th month= $800 paid in BTC
On the 4th of September we sent him $250 worth in BTC (he was supposed to get paid biweekly) So for 10 days we ended up paying him for 2 weeks actually.



Based on the conversation we had with him, his computer wasn't performing very well so we decided and agreed to purchase him a new computer for $587.89. The deal was for us to pay for the full amount of the computer but $200 out of the $587.89 was supposed to be as an incentive for his future cooperation. And the remaining was supposed to be deducted monthly at the price of $50/$60 every month until it was paid off.

Here is the attached copy of the payment that was made on September 3rd for the computer.



Based on unproductive cooperation we decided to end the terms with him. So, Mr. Dviola was supposed to receive the other biweekly payment of $250 in BTC but we ended the terms. So technically, he owes us the difference($337.89) we paid for the computer.

We will not waste any further time to answer Mr. Dviolas comments on social media but if he continues the harassment we will put in place our legal rights.