Who is holding private keys for addresses generated and used on your website?
I guess you have the full control, but you tell us we should be our own banks
As stated on our home page we use a shared wallet for our users. That means that your balance isn't connected to a specific address. Would we give users access to the private keys, they could spend the bitcoins and still have the balance in their account to withdraw from other wallets. By telling you to be your own bank we ask you to not use our platform to hold big amount of Bitcoin.
Closed source website that you been working for long time like you say, but purchased domain only few days ago does not look so trustwothy.
Domain Name: BITSBURG.IO
Registry Domain ID: D503300001183888401-LRMS
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.namecheap.com
Registrar URL:
www.namecheap.comUpdated Date: 2020-10-14T15:12:59Z
Creation Date: 2020-04-21T17:04:38Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2021-04-21T17:04:38Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date:
https://www.whois.com/whois/bitsburg.ioWe started to work on the project nearly a year ago. A few months after we began development we registered the domain name. You might have mixed up the update and creation date here, the domain was created on April 21st which is a few months ago.
You don't even have to trust Satoshi Nakamoto to trust Bitcoin. Even Satoshi himself can't steal my Bitcoins.
People still put trust into his vision and bitsburg is our vision of a non-regulated and anonymous exchange. Our platform is an alternative to others which people learned to trust over the years. The next months will show if people put this trust in our project, too. Just think about all the anonymous mixing services where people also put trust into.
That's not really encouraging.
We noticed that most new projects, especially these who provide an anonymous service, get accused of planning a scam. Unfortunately, many people here are very toxic against new members and don't want to give them a chance. We are just asking for this chance.
So you know you have no reputation, and yet you're offering "to escrow" funds up to "USD1,000,000 per trade".
How can you convince me this isn't created to be an exit scam? There's no point using an escrow that isn't highly trusted by both parties.
We provide an alternative to other platforms with a lot of restrictions. The low maximum amount per trade is one restriction on other platforms. We don't ask anyone to complete such big trades on our platform, we also handle small transactions below $1. If you read our FAQ you will notice that we suggest our customers to not deposit a big amount of Bitcoin if not needed. As you clearly state, we're not highly trusted yet but that can change in the future after we handled a lot of small transactions first.
I'd like you to explain to me why it's important for you to stay anonymous. I can think of several reasons myself, and none of them make you look good
It's obvious that we have to stay anonymous to offer a service that doesn't require KYC, isn't it? Also keep in mind that our shared wallet functionality can be used to mix coins once there's enough traffic on our platform. Do you want to say that providing a privacy focused project automatically makes one not look good? There's so many people who are against KYC, we provide a solution. Isn't it only fair that both parties are allowed to protect their identity?
How are you going to prevent
trust farming?
Both users were last active one second apart.There will always be those who farm/trade trust. This will surely happen on bitsburg as well as on other Peer-to-Peer exchanges. We're planning to add an additional trust flag for reputated members, for example for high ranked Bitcointalk members.
Every click on an offer or Feedback opens a new tab. That's annoying.
Thank you very much for your feedback. In this early stage we need as much feedback as possible. Waiting for more feedback now and then we might change this.