Author

Topic: [ANN] CommunityCoin (COMM) | Pure PoS | Original COMM MultiPools Coming Soon - page 218. (Read 523929 times)

hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 501
As a Community member, I'm not intending to troll, but afraid of the possibility that COMM will be killed by someone's greed.

Some clarity as far as what is left, and who was given coins, is needed. If for nothing else, to give trolls something less to talk about. Any time the price rises on the coin, expect trolls... people who sold the coin for less or those who want to buy it cheaper.

I would be extremely doubtful that the dev wants to dump on an exchange. I mean, think about it... why would any dev want to dump a coin the first day it appears on a big exchange? Even if you assume the worst, that the dev has a stockpile of 10M (or however many) spare coins, I see no reason for him to dump anytime soon -- to get 10 btcs or instead of doing basically a tiny amount of work, and wait a while and easily get 30-50+ btcs?

As for the delay, I will just assume a normal excuse. Like he has a life, work and a family. People here can expect immediate answers, immediate action, but many devs aren't scouring the forums all day. I'd give him some time.

Devs have done a decent job so far. The price is kept relatively low due to ppls doubt and suspicion.
Let's give devs some time to clarify things out. If you can't stay calm, dump as you like.
hero member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 509
As a Community member, I'm not intending to troll, but afraid of the possibility that COMM will be killed by someone's greed.

Some clarity as far as what is left, and who was given coins, is needed. If for nothing else, to give trolls something less to talk about. Any time the price rises on the coin, expect trolls... people who sold the coin for less or those who want to buy it cheaper.

I would be extremely doubtful that the dev wants to dump on an exchange. I mean, think about it... why would any dev want to dump a coin the first day it appears on a big exchange? Even if you assume the worst, that the dev has a stockpile of 10M (or however many) spare coins, I see no reason for him to dump anytime soon -- to get 10 btcs or instead of doing basically a tiny amount of work, and wait a while and easily get 30-50+ btcs?

As for the delay, I will just assume a normal excuse. Like he has a life, work and a family. People here can expect immediate answers, immediate action, but many devs aren't scouring the forums all day. I'd give him some time.
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 501
I am lucky to get 2 stakes, and I have been keeping buying COMM, because I do believe in COMM.
The community here is amazing, the distribution is relatively fair, and developments are continuing. Though there are some issued need to be addressed, COMM will be a big player in Cryptocurrency world.
hero member
Activity: 1162
Merit: 568
As a Community member, I'm not intending to troll, but afraid of the possibility that COMM will be killed by someone's greed.
hero member
Activity: 1162
Merit: 568
Guys I will say it one more time in normal sized font so as not to offend, be true to yourself and be true to the ideals this coin supposedly fosters.  

The Dev has to complete distribution and give an accounting of that completed distribution or this coin will never see 300 SAT or 200 SAT ever again, you are now at a net worth close to 1 million dollars and you can not rely on anyone simply typing I sent out coins to 430 ppl, the potential for fraud is vast, you have to have it documented both in list form and by the blockchain.  

Don't let greed and fear of not getting staked cloud your vision or prevent you from voicing your valid concerns, this will only let the Dev out of this his most basic responsibility, if you do than this coin is a joke and will always be a joke never realizing any potential that was there.

I agree. Dev tells me there are 10m coins left for distribution, but he has 50 people he could send to. Considering distributing 200k to each, but worried about community response.

1.  I don't have proof or audit figures myself.

2. The premise seems reasonable and I am inclined to give benefit of doubt provided there is some evidence eventually.

3. What does the Community think of a last distribution of 200k  to 50 people ?

If this is not agreed what shall the dev do ?


I have seen this sort of situation before, and people fret and get upset , but it gets worked out anyway. I am impartial either way because if I want coins I am going to have to buy some with my BTC.  I have already put in 10x the time value of work for the coins I got.

Are there only 10m coins left for distribution? 
If I understand correctly,  I saw the number is 80m instead of 10m.
Where is the other 70m?

Yes, we need a stakeholder list.

Guys,  if you are looking at this thread, you will find these truths.  I got confused as I can't figure out what the dev is planning to do.  You, bro, can judge it.

1. The distribution lasted one month now,  since 25th, March.

2. the dev said 470 stakes have been distributed at 1st round, and ~330 stakes have been distributed at 2nd round. Anyway, we didn't see a list of 1st round stakeholders. And I know there are a lot of ppls who are in the 2nd round raw list (~283 names in ecoiner) didn't get their stake in 2nd round distribution.  Where did their stakes go?

3. After the dev said 196mil coins were lost, the dev said that there were 80mil coins left for the "final round distribution" (so called re-consideration).  Now you said there were only 10mil coins left for distribution.  Where did the left 70mil coins go?

4. The dev said he is very busy.  The distribution has been paused for half month. So what was the dev busy on?  Cash out on new exchanges?  I don't know. But the dev knew that.  And the re-consideration form (online) is "under-testing" for weeks. I don't know what difficulties there are to setup it. As the reconsideration form is similar to the former one, just need some minor changes.  I don't know why the dev don't want to do it as it's easy if he is planning to do so. The ony explanation is he NEVER want to do so.

5. The dev asked us to vote on each exchanges. But he always prevented us to sell on exchanges (he threaten ppl : blacklist you if you sell your COMM).  Do you think it's wired?  Encourage exchanges to add COMM, but don't want our stakeholders to trade.  So what's the purpose of being on exchanges?  Only let the dev himself sell his coin, right?

6. How many coins are still in the hand of the dev?  we don't know, at least before a full stakeholder list is released. But I can't expect the dev is planning to release one.  

7. The dev never talked about the huge interests from PoS of initial COMM. I guess there are at least 8mil to 10mil interests in the hand of the dev.  He never mentioned these interests as they never exist.

Think about them.    So is COMM the coin of the community or the coin of the only dev?
sr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 250
Give it a few days to pan out..early dumpers dumping for quick cash and whales trying to keep price low..it should stabilize if everyone doesn't sell their coins too fast.

The MintPal vote was truly the only thing binding this community together, now that is done.  Sinking ship.  Rats.

Information Coin would be the one to follow now if you did not receive free coins, their Dev did a public account of the distribution, complete transparency.


I don't understand your interest here...did you sell coins at a loss?
No . He didn't sold his coins. because he is not on the list! Cheesy
full member
Activity: 162
Merit: 100

I agree. Dev tells me there are 10m coins left for distribution, but he has 50 people he could send to. Considering distributing 200k to each, but worried about community response.

1.  I don't have proof or audit figures myself.

2. The premise seems reasonable and I am inclined to give benefit of doubt provided there is some evidence eventually.

3. What does the Community think of a last distribution of 200k  to 50 people ?

If this is not agreed what shall the dev do ?


I have seen this sort of situation before, and people fret and get upset , but it gets worked out anyway. I am impartial either way because if I want coins I am going to have to buy some with my BTC.  I have already put in 10x the time value of work for the coins I got.


As someone who applied for a stake but was overlooked, I'd be extremely  happy to get 200K or even less.

I expect less angry people if they get something each. I will support the coin either way. It's just that it would be nicer to have at least a smaller stake.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
please answer that's why?
my name on the 2rd list,but i don't receive my coins until now!
where's is my coin?
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Congratulation!

COMM is listed on mintpal

 Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley
hero member
Activity: 1162
Merit: 568
Guys I will say it one more time in normal sized font so as not to offend, be true to yourself and be true to the ideals this coin supposedly fosters.  

The Dev has to complete distribution and give an accounting of that completed distribution or this coin will never see 300 SAT or 200 SAT ever again, you are now at a net worth close to 1 million dollars and you can not rely on anyone simply typing I sent out coins to 430 ppl, the potential for fraud is vast, you have to have it documented both in list form and by the blockchain.  

Don't let greed and fear of not getting staked cloud your vision or prevent you from voicing your valid concerns, this will only let the Dev out of this his most basic responsibility, if you do than this coin is a joke and will always be a joke never realizing any potential that was there.

I agree. Dev tells me there are 10m coins left for distribution, but he has 50 people he could send to. Considering distributing 200k to each, but worried about community response.

1.  I don't have proof or audit figures myself.

2. The premise seems reasonable and I am inclined to give benefit of doubt provided there is some evidence eventually.

3. What does the Community think of a last distribution of 200k  to 50 people ?

If this is not agreed what shall the dev do ?


I have seen this sort of situation before, and people fret and get upset , but it gets worked out anyway. I am impartial either way because if I want coins I am going to have to buy some with my BTC.  I have already put in 10x the time value of work for the coins I got.

Are there only 10m coins left for distribution? 
If I understand correctly,  I saw the number is 80m instead of 10m.
Where is the other 70m?

Yes, we need a stakeholder list.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
I'm quite impressed with how well this coin is doing. It seems to be the first "free" coin that the community is accepting as valuable. I would like to be a part of the "community".
full member
Activity: 160
Merit: 100
Congratulation to all COMMunity... Comm reached 1M dollar market cap today and increasing..  Smiley
Yeah!

But That's where we need to go.

Dogecoin   $ 43,480,348   $ 0.000596   72,984,789,038 DOGE   $ 961,838   

Wow...

Go to 45m is possible?

only with whales pump

before whales become whales,  dumpers are needed to dump their coins. 
Don't be panic if the price drops.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
djm34 = Are you trying to be a smart-ass?

dload.1 = Thanx much  Grin
legendary
Activity: 994
Merit: 1004
BTC
Give it a few days to pan out..early dumpers dumping for quick cash and whales trying to keep price low..it should stabilize if everyone doesn't sell their coins too fast.

The MintPal vote was truly the only thing binding this community together, now that is done.  Sinking ship.  Rats.

Information Coin would be the one to follow now if you did not receive free coins, their Dev did a public account of the distribution, complete transparency.

You can check the ITC stakeholders list and you will find its "fairnee".
Fully qualified members have been ignored by them.


Where is that list.. I cant find it Huh


ANYBODY?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=578723.80       page 5 now please send my herpes  coins Grin
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
Give it a few days to pan out..early dumpers dumping for quick cash and whales trying to keep price low..it should stabilize if everyone doesn't sell their coins too fast.

The MintPal vote was truly the only thing binding this community together, now that is done.  Sinking ship.  Rats.

Information Coin would be the one to follow now if you did not receive free coins, their Dev did a public account of the distribution, complete transparency.

You can check the ITC stakeholders list and you will find its "fairnee".
Fully qualified members have been ignored by them.


Where is that list.. I cant find it Huh


ANYBODY?
may-be ask them, do we ask for the list of herpes holders (...carriers) here ?
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Give it a few days to pan out..early dumpers dumping for quick cash and whales trying to keep price low..it should stabilize if everyone doesn't sell their coins too fast.

The MintPal vote was truly the only thing binding this community together, now that is done.  Sinking ship.  Rats.

Information Coin would be the one to follow now if you did not receive free coins, their Dev did a public account of the distribution, complete transparency.

You can check the ITC stakeholders list and you will find its "fairnee".
Fully qualified members have been ignored by them.


Where is that list.. I cant find it Huh


ANYBODY?
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Give it a few days to pan out..early dumpers dumping for quick cash and whales trying to keep price low..it should stabilize if everyone doesn't sell their coins too fast.

The MintPal vote was truly the only thing binding this community together, now that is done.  Sinking ship.  Rats.

Information Coin would be the one to follow now if you did not receive free coins, their Dev did a public account of the distribution, complete transparency.


I don't understand your interest here...did you sell coins at a loss?
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Well Guys, we are into the Trolls, Attackers and Whingers phase now. In my experience it lasts a while, but the best response is to get on with some real work.

A good way to avoid getting bogged down in pointless argument is to end distributions here and now, and remaining coins go to the bounties for projects.
Then list all distributions and publish them (with addresses)
I have put that to the devs.


Yes that makes perfect sense, willing put 10 million more coins into the hands of a Dev that has shown no accounting of how coins were distributed and likely never will. 

In the past the Community has been the one to fund projects/bounties and that part has actually worked out well, why would they need the Dev with his carelessness, arbitrary decisions and complete lack of accountability in charge of one extra coin of the Community's coin?

1st project on Dev's list, dump 10 million coins on exchange.
full member
Activity: 284
Merit: 101
Will there be another distribution round?
full member
Activity: 133
Merit: 100
the distribution of comm is great, we are on mintpal and comm in just one day. we have made it. let us hold the coins and make comm to the dogecoin of 2014.
Jump to: