How do you check if the reviews were written honestly, and just to get a reward? Or how do you tell if a review is useful or not?
For example take a look in Exchange section on Curve Finance review. "Its very good" because it is easy to use. Same can be said about almost every exchange. Second exchange that got a review - Coinbase. A review was written by a person that is not a trader. How can this be approved?
You can not, since trust is just a gimmick.
not going to lie I have seen something like this before on
https://revain.org/, at the very beginning even they were encouraging people to write a review about something like an exchange, a platform and etc to get incentive from them and if you compare both of them you should see some similarity which means the review will not be created naturally. at least revain does not highlight trust on their platform.
I know this platform, it's just a review platform, we don't force you to write, we just reward the winners as the best company. And anyone writes bad or good company and that's it.
CRYPTO AWARDS - ranking where each nominee is competing for the honour to be named the Best of the Best. And let the people choose and we will announce the results
This is why it can easily be abused, just look at most of the exchange listings that involves voting, most f the projects incentivise people to go and vote for them and if something like this happen it has defeated the whole aim of your project because this means the award goes to the project that can incentives more especially in crypto where people have prices, Youtubers, Twitter influencers and telegram group are paid to shill the projects of a price or token allocation
If that will happen, they are just fooling themselves to receive such award. Because they know if they paid a lot of these viewers just to get that award. Will it be satisfactory from their end? I don't think so. And those that will review such feedbacks should also have their expertise on that particular subject. Otherwise, how can they gauge that such reviews are valid and logical? And in this regard, they need veteran crypto users because if they are just newbie in this field, I don't think they can provide constructive criticism on the subject matter.
any review is valuable and a large number of reviews will yield an average score. The opinion of anyone in the crypto world is important to us
a professional can also be paid by the firm
voting is not just a vote, but also a review everyone reads what the person voted for and the community will realise it is a scam or respond to this feedback
this month we will add feedback on the reviews
we need more people and then there will be fair ratings
the company can also respond to each assessment and feedback
we say all write an honest review and rate!
and each company has the right to call on its supporters to vote
