Author

Topic: [ANN] [ICO] [POW] - Glyff, privacy for smart contracts, powered by zkSNARKs (Read 560 times)

copper member
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
Locking this thread and preserving it for future reference. Reposting without the unfounded Fake team member accusations.

New topic : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annicopow-glyff-private-smart-contracts-zksnark-scalable-ethzcash-5106843
copper member
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
We have published an introductory article on our official Medium page, here.
If you have 4 minutes to spare, read on and comment. Your feedback is important for us.
copper member
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
We are waiting for an answer from ICOEthics to provide proof.


Proof of what? I think your team is the one that maybe needs to provide something.. not ICOEthics.

Well, we contacted you via email on Friday  and expected some kind of reply.  Check your inbox, we sent proof that Olga is a real person and she works for Glyff.


We dont open email attachments. You sent a file to ICOEthics email, but our comments about Olga were made on this thread.
It is not appropriate for you to reply to our email when questions were raised on a public forum.
 


We understand, here is the proof you requested :

https://glyff.io/images/KQIVVMNGK1.jpg
https://glyff.io/images/KQIVVMNGK2.jpg
https://glyff.io/images/KQIVVMNGK3.jpg

We hope this clears the misunderstanding.

Thank you for posting these images. I am sure investors will appreciate this.

Not often the team responds so promptly. Now we can be almost sure that there are real people behind the project.
Although i would, in the place of the developers, still did not show such information in the general access but only in a personal message. And here im want to thank you for saving many users from bad investments!

Yes, we have assumed from ICOEthics response, that proof needed to be posted publicly on the forum.  We are authorized to use the pictures in this context and will remove them as soon as they become irrelevant.
sr. member
Activity: 1134
Merit: 276
We are waiting for an answer from ICOEthics to provide proof.


Proof of what? I think your team is the one that maybe needs to provide something.. not ICOEthics.

Well, we contacted you via email on Friday  and expected some kind of reply.  Check your inbox, we sent proof that Olga is a real person and she works for Glyff.


We dont open email attachments. You sent a file to ICOEthics email, but our comments about Olga were made on this thread.
It is not appropriate for you to reply to our email when questions were raised on a public forum.
 


We understand, here is the proof you requested :

https://glyff.io/images/KQIVVMNGK1.jpg
https://glyff.io/images/KQIVVMNGK2.jpg
https://glyff.io/images/KQIVVMNGK3.jpg

We hope this clears the misunderstanding.

Thank you for posting these images. I am sure investors will appreciate this.

Not often the team responds so promptly. Now we can be almost sure that there are real people behind the project.
Although i would, in the place of the developers, still did not show such information in the general access but only in a personal message. And here im want to thank you for saving many users from bad investments!
copper member
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
We are waiting for an answer from ICOEthics to provide proof.


Proof of what? I think your team is the one that maybe needs to provide something.. not ICOEthics.

Well, we contacted you via email on Friday  and expected some kind of reply.  Check your inbox, we sent proof that Olga is a real person and she works for Glyff.


We dont open email attachments. You sent a file to ICOEthics email, but our comments about Olga were made on this thread.
It is not appropriate for you to reply to our email when questions were raised on a public forum.
 


We understand, here is the proof you requested :

https://glyff.io/images/KQIVVMNGK1.jpg
https://glyff.io/images/KQIVVMNGK2.jpg
https://glyff.io/images/KQIVVMNGK3.jpg

We hope this clears the misunderstanding.

Thank you for posting these images. I am sure investors will appreciate this.

Thank you, keep up the good work.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 892
We are waiting for an answer from ICOEthics to provide proof.


Proof of what? I think your team is the one that maybe needs to provide something.. not ICOEthics.

Well, we contacted you via email on Friday  and expected some kind of reply.  Check your inbox, we sent proof that Olga is a real person and she works for Glyff.


We dont open email attachments. You sent a file to ICOEthics email, but our comments about Olga were made on this thread.
It is not appropriate for you to reply to our email when questions were raised on a public forum.
 


We understand, here is the proof you requested :

https://glyff.io/images/KQIVVMNGK1.jpg
https://glyff.io/images/KQIVVMNGK2.jpg
https://glyff.io/images/KQIVVMNGK3.jpg

We hope this clears the misunderstanding.

Thank you for posting these images. I am sure investors will appreciate this.
copper member
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
We are waiting for an answer from ICOEthics to provide proof.


Proof of what? I think your team is the one that maybe needs to provide something.. not ICOEthics.

Well, we contacted you via email on Friday  and expected some kind of reply.  Check your inbox, we sent proof that Olga is a real person and she works for Glyff.


We dont open email attachments. You sent a file to ICOEthics email, but our comments about Olga were made on this thread.
It is not appropriate for you to reply to our email when questions were raised on a public forum.
 


We understand, here is the proof you requested :

https://glyff.io/images/KQIVVMNGK1.jpg
https://glyff.io/images/KQIVVMNGK2.jpg
https://glyff.io/images/KQIVVMNGK3.jpg

We hope this clears the misunderstanding.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 892
We are waiting for an answer from ICOEthics to provide proof.


Proof of what? I think your team is the one that maybe needs to provide something.. not ICOEthics.

Well, we contacted you via email on Friday  and expected some kind of reply.  Check your inbox, we sent proof that Olga is a real person and she works for Glyff.


We dont open email attachments. You sent a file to ICOEthics email, but our comments about Olga were made on this thread.
It is not appropriate for you to reply to our email when questions were raised on a public forum.
 

copper member
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
We are waiting for an answer from ICOEthics to provide proof.


Proof of what? I think your team is the one that maybe needs to provide something.. not ICOEthics.

Well, we contacted you via email on Friday  and expected some kind of reply.  Check your inbox, we sent proof that Olga is a real person and she works for Glyff.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 892
We are waiting for an answer from ICOEthics to provide proof.


Proof of what? I think your team is the one that maybe needs to provide something.. not ICOEthics.
copper member
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
there already similar Platform, why you build another one?

Our whitepaper with tokenomics touches on some of the differences between Glyff and its closest competitors. 
Glyff ambition is to deliver an usable product that will help scientific development and foster innovation, while creating opportunities for the community.
full member
Activity: 414
Merit: 101
there already similar Platform, why you build another one?
copper member
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
Is there any informative video about GLY and Atum tokens? I am confused on why do you need 2 of them.

GLY is needed to pay the equivalent of Ethereum's "Gas" on our platform.  Atum token is an evolution of the ERC20 standard implementing zkSNARKs, which allows you to execute  private transfers on the Glyff network.  You will need GLY to pay Gas for Atum transfers, although you will be also able to delegate the payment to another user.
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 17
We have spoken with our marketing representative and uncovered the misunderstanding.
Miss Olga Fomina is indeed a real person, she is a russian journalist and writer, the name Alesya Dovlatova is a pseudonym she uses for her books (this is common practice for writers).
She will verify her identity through a third party KYC service if needed.

The best she can do is provide a selfie with today's date written on a paper, or a video talking about the project. We all are aware that many sites that offer KYC services appear to be scam supporters/promoters. We also know that she already failed KYC once (maybe more) at some website and participated on IDACpro scam.  Maybe you should post videos of the rest of your team here to avoid any future questions in regards they legitimacy.
Totally agree. Been carrying their signature and actually recommending the project to peers, but this throws a major spanner in the works. Seen my fair share of shady projects and would rather cut losses. Better a good name and a humble roof than a bad one in a palace. Will keep abreast of development
full member
Activity: 364
Merit: 101
Is there any informative video about GLY and Atum tokens? I am confused on why do you need 2 of them.
copper member
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
Looks like scam.

Please, refrain from calling our project a scam without evidence. The issue regarding Miss Olga Fomina is a misunderstanding and we are ready to prove it.
We are waiting for an answer from ICOEthics to provide proof.
sr. member
Activity: 1622
Merit: 270
Undeads.com - P2E Runner Game
copper member
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
We have spoken with our marketing representative and uncovered the misunderstanding.
Miss Olga Fomina is indeed a real person, she is a russian journalist and writer, the name Alesya Dovlatova is a pseudonym she uses for her books (this is common practice for writers).
She will verify her identity through a third party KYC service if needed.

The best she can do is provide a selfie with today's date written on a paper, or a video talking about the project. We all are aware that many sites that offer KYC services appear to be scam supporters/promoters. We also know that she already failed KYC once (maybe more) at some website and participated on IDACpro scam.  Maybe you should post videos of the rest of your team here to avoid any future questions in regards they legitimacy.

The situation has been fully clarified and we are ready to provide a selfie of her with passport in hand, and even the books she wrote with the other pseudonym.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 892
We have spoken with our marketing representative and uncovered the misunderstanding.
Miss Olga Fomina is indeed a real person, she is a russian journalist and writer, the name Alesya Dovlatova is a pseudonym she uses for her books (this is common practice for writers).
She will verify her identity through a third party KYC service if needed.

The best she can do is provide a selfie with today's date written on a paper, or a video talking about the project. We all are aware that many sites that offer KYC services appear to be scam supporters/promoters. We also know that she already failed KYC once (maybe more) at some website and participated on IDACpro scam.  Maybe you should post videos of the rest of your team here to avoid any future questions in regards they legitimacy.
copper member
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
We have spoken with our marketing representative and uncovered the misunderstanding.
Miss Olga Fomina is indeed a real person, she is a russian journalist and writer, the name Alesya Dovlatova is a pseudonym she uses for her books (this is common practice for writers).
She will verify her identity through a third party KYC service if needed.

Yeah I think the team needs to come upfront and assure investors about the authenticity of the project. Nowadays people are very skeptic of ICO projects so you better stand out from the rest if you want to catch any attention, if not bad attention will likely flow easier.

We definitely agree with you. Glyff has been in the space since a few months already and we are working hard at developing our product and community while pursuing organic growth.
As already mentioned,  we are ready for clear up any misunderstanding.

P.S. Thank you for considering us in first place, we would be glad to have you on-board our token sale.
sr. member
Activity: 868
Merit: 279
We have spoken with our marketing representative and uncovered the misunderstanding.
Miss Olga Fomina is indeed a real person, she is a russian journalist and writer, the name Alesya Dovlatova is a pseudonym she uses for her books (this is common practice for writers).
She will verify her identity through a third party KYC service if needed.

Yeah I think the team needs to come upfront and assure investors about the authenticity of the project. Nowadays people are very skeptic of ICO projects so you better stand out from the rest if you want to catch any attention, if not bad attention will likely flow easier.
copper member
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
pow?

Yes, our mining algorithm will be initially based around proof of work (PoW), specifically we will be using ETHASH by Ethereum, although there are plans to transition to other schemes in the future.
copper member
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
We have spoken with our marketing representative and uncovered the misunderstanding.
Miss Olga Fomina is indeed a real person, she is a russian journalist and writer, the name Alesya Dovlatova is a pseudonym she uses for her books (this is common practice for writers).
She will verify her identity through a third party KYC service if needed.
sr. member
Activity: 868
Merit: 279

Thanks for the head up, Miss Olga Fomina came to be a team member as part of the deal with our marketing company. We have been given assurances that she is a real person by multiple sources before adding her to the team.
We are currently investigating the issue.

I wanted to participate in the bounty and token sale, but this type of situations are bad specially when the project is starting and considering the bear market, this will affect negatively if the team doesn't do a live AMA or something to prove their authenticity.

Thank you ICOethics for your dilligence!
copper member
Activity: 39
Merit: 0

Thanks for the head up, Miss Olga Fomina came to be a team member as part of the deal with our marketing company. We have been given assurances that she is a real person by multiple sources before adding her to the team.
We are currently investigating the issue.
copper member
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
Locking this thread and preserving it for future reference. Reposting without the unfounded Fake team member accusations.

New topic : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annicopow-glyff-private-smart-contracts-zksnark-scalable-ethzcash-5106843
copper member
Activity: 39
Merit: 0



What is Glyff ?


1234567891011121123456789123456789101112112345678912345678910111211234567891234567891011121123456789






We are building a next-generation decentralized
platform that enables secure value transfers
and smart contract execution, in complete
confidentiality and with strong correctness
guarantees. Glyff, like Ethereum, allows
development of decentralized applications, but
with a key difference : the ability of concealing
data from the computing nodes.
This enables developers to include sensitive
data in their smart-contracts, directly
on-chain, without compromise on security





Overview

1234567891011121123456789123456789101112112345678912345678910111211234567891234567891011121123456789










The goal of Glyff is to create an easily
accessible, privacy-preserving decentralized
platform on which all businesses can benefit
from smart contracts. It will provide the
security and privacy required to ensure an
efficient platform which is trust-less, scalable
and fully accessible to those without extensive
knowledge of cryptography such that it can
be truly ubiquitous and with no barriers.


1234567891011121123456789123456789101112112345678912345678910111211234567891234567891011121123456789




Glyff achieves privacy by leveraging
a cryptographic technique known as
“Zero-Knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive
Argument of Knowledge”
, shortly zk-SNARK, which
allows the verification of a smart contract without
revealing the data that held within it.
That way, computation can be carried out
verifiably while all the information can
be immutably recorded onto the
blockchain without being exposed to third parties.
A “zero knowledge proof of correctness” is
published and verified by the consensus nodes
in order to guarantee integrity of operations.
Private data is shareable within and
between the relevant organizations, but it
remains unavailable to all others, guaranteeing
privacy.




Publications


12345678910111211234567891123456789112345678911234567891234567891011121123456789112345678911234567891123456789
Whitepaper (with tokenomics) Technical whitepaper (working draft)




Coin specifications



1234567891011121123456789123456789101112112345678912345678910111211234567891234567891011121123456789
Max amountBlock reward Block time Hashing algorithm
~100,000,000 5 GLY 12 seconds ETHASH




Token Distribution


123456789101112112345678912345678910111211234567891234512345678910111211234567891234567891011121123456789








Total tokens issued (100%)
50,000,000


Total tokens for sale (65%)
32,500,000


Glyff Reserve (15%)
7,500,000


Team and early contributors (10%)
5,000,000


Community group & strategic partners (10%)
5,000,000






Glyff sale

123456789101112112345678912345678910111211234567891234567891011121123456789
Minimum investment: $125 Maximum investment
(without KYC):
$10,000
 
Accepted currencies: ETH, BTC, BCH

12345678910111211234567891234567891011121123456789
Phase Start dateEnd date
Pre-sale December 20 2018 March 19 2019
Phase 1 March 20 2019 May 5 2019
Phase 2 May 6 2019 May 14 2019
Phase 3 May 15 2019 Jun 1 2019
Final phase Jun 2 2019 June 19 2019



12345678910111211234567891234567891011121123456789
Phase DiscountToken price
Pre-sale 25% $0.123
Phase 1 20% $0.131
Phase 2 10% $0.148
Phase 3 5% $0.156
Final phase 0% $0.164




Roadmap


12345678910111211234567891234567891234561234567891011121123456789123456789123456
Q2/3 2018 Q3/4 2018
Research starts
Prototyping of MVP consensus
node and wallet (Sprout)
Consensus node and wallet
(Early release)
Private test-net launch




123456789101134234324121123456789123456789101134234324121123456789123456789101134234324121123456789
Q1/2 2019 Q2/3 2019 Q3/4 2019
Publication of first whitepaper
working draft (Sapling)
Token Generation event
Public testnet launch
Programmable privacy
Security audit
Consensus node and wallet
(Stable release)
Main-net launch
Developer toolchain and documentation
Mobile wallet (Android/iOS)





 




Team



123456789101112112345678901112112345678912345678910111211234567890111211234567891234567891011121123456789011121123456789
Christopher Moore
CEO & Founder
Anatolii Vedmid
Software Developer

Noah Vesely
Researcher & Engineer




12345678910111011121123456789211234567891234567891001112112345678911121123456789
 
Dave Narby
Content Editor
Olga Fomina
Marketing Manager


Rating & Exchanges




12345678910111211234567891234567891011121123456789123456789101112112345678912345678910111211234567891234567891011121123456789








Contact & Social links




12345678910789101234567891078910123456789107891012345678910789101234567891078910012341234567891078910123123456789107891001234123456789107891012345678910789101234567891078910
WebsiteGithubBountyGitterTelegramMediumFacebookLinkedInRedditTwitter

`
Jump to: