Topic: [ANN] Stipend-Zenith Freelancing |Pow-PoS 3.0| Zerocoin Technology | Quark (Read 526 times)

Still no split of block reward between masternode and miner. What a joke of a coin 

This is a project that can quickly enter, and such projects can quickly invest. This is a good opportunity to make a profit in the short term.I am surely interested in this project looking forward for the positive outcome of this project..

Issue #1 has been pointed out to two people in private messages on discord. Hopefully more to come.

You really don't have an inch of comprehension. You said masternodes don't start getting paid until block 50k. I said masternodes have already started getting paid (meaning the block height). Obviously no one has mined enough for a masternode. And I have tested the masternode payments so I know they work NICK. You're just upset that Stipend has been on a downward trend for months.

Also, if you go to the [Tools > Information] menu within your wallet, you'll see the masternode count on the network - 0.

In short, you have 0 masternodes and all of those are being paid correctly. 

No, if you look at the in-wallet block explorer and compare it to any of the PIVX clones that actually work, you'll see that the entire 18.00000000 SPDZ is going to a single address for each block. The 18 SPDZ is NOT split into separate UTXO's for the reward split between masternode and miner. Have a look at the explorer within the wallet of PIVX or any working clone and you'll see how it SHOULD look.

If anyone wants to know what the first issue is, private message me. As soon as I determine that you're an active BTT user and not this amateur developer trying to figure out where he's gone wrong, I'll provide details of this schoolboy error.

Yup, you're an idiot. Masternodes have already started getting paid. And you didn't "find" any issues. You had no idea what the first "issue" was you just lied about code you had no idea of how to understand. You are really showing your ignorance NICK. But if you were intelligent you would realize the old stipend code does have a bug that only pays Masternodes roughly once every 3 days.

I've just found another major issue. The following is a quote from the dev after the chain was reset earlier this week:


Do not believe this tripe. The second issue I've found means that masternodes won't get paid any coins at all. This is the reason for the moving of masternode payments from block 1850 to block 50000 - by which time the dev will be long gone with the masternode sales proceeds. He couldn't fix the code so moved masternode payments to a later block so that masternode sales could be completed before all hell breaks loose.

To be honest, my intention with this thread was to use the first bug to obtain a bounty of a masternode. My discovery of the second bug means I don't want the bounty anymore as I know that this coin will never make it to the exchange for my coins to be worth anything to me. It'll be an exit scam after masternode sales are complete because the coin, if added to an exchange, will completely tank when masternode payments are supposed to start and do not materialize.

All theses websites hurrying to reference this scam coin, we can see how serious it is 

You are a really stupid developer, you should research how many major sites use wordpress as it's host with php operating the server side.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WordPress - You are inventing and lying about everything, redirecting any blame on the team. Reminds me so much of BCash, sadly less competent and just screaming lies.

Get your facts straight, Wordpress is a blog/website presentation tool. If you can't code it's the right tool of course.

I won't be commenting anymore you are already stealing too much time from the team, try building something without pointing at others that are really working, again i would love to know who is behind the project.

But you have an entire team, and still no functioning alpha, besides that you are using Node.js and vue...worse than wordpress to operate a payment server, you'll be hacked within a week if you ever did create something functional, which you wont. The Wordpress code, which you so ignorantly shun is written solely in php and c++. Which is what any potential secure crypto payment gateway must be written in to operate, so you are so blindly throwing accusations that you can't even realize you can't integrate a crypto gateway through node.js and vue.

Then you try and create the same platform using the same engine and we'll see who's the competent developer. Your premise is akin to me saying someone uses photoshop so their designs aren't valid. The code is fully modified, theres no blockchain intergration in this theme among many other things. I'm smart enough to realize it's more efficient to modify the code in a framework than to waste time writing basic functions and calls.

Essentially, what you are saying is that since you forked from a scam coin 'Bithold' that your blockchain isn't yours. Using your logic, since you used a blockchain template, none of your modifications matter. Common sense, you're trying to disqualify my advances when you are doing the same thing.

Not to mention your site is also a wordpress theme.....

What code are you referring to ? MY GOD YOU ARE USING A WORDPRESS TEMPLATE https://microjobengine.enginethemes.com/ you have no real Alpha as of now since it's a 5 minute installation process. Really sad to see an incompetent blaming others for his failures i bet the Stipend team crashed you blockchain too ? Maybe it has also affected the weather so it's raining on you today ... Really sad but people will eventually realize how incompetent you are.

Cool...

Let's come back to this a little closer to the time of your next hard-fork - it's not far away.

The issue that froze the chain was due to Terahertz of ASICs jumping on the project too soon, with such hash power the header versions didn't update with the modifier. So at block 1k the headers were at version 3 when they were supposed to update to version 4. That is impossible to test, but what wasn't impossible was a fix, which I coded.

Whether a coin was built by a single developer, or a team of 500, a bug is a bug and you should have been using an approach of asking for me to provide information so that you could fix it. Instead, you took the approach of arguing that I was a Stipend developer and that your code is perfect.

You are not promoting a masternode sale because you know that those that invest in MN sales will be asking anyway. They always do. Hell, I even see them ask at times on Discords of coins with no masternode functionality.

I like how you avoid the 'Did you also 'test all methods' prior to the chain come crashing down?' question. Nicely done!!!

You are also neglecting the fact that I am a single developer. Once I build a team this project will have daily significant updates. I have helped many "big" projects you mention. But now I am working to fix many projects that can't function on their own. The Stipend team refused to implement many of the suggestions I gave them, even though I asked to assist them for free, so I created the project myself and made it free.

when Github has a new view and creates a new system in which the system has a role in all the blockchain in the world and can minimize the scam project is a genius concept. I really hope big success of this project in the future. and dev is able to overcome all the problems he will face

Are we promoting a MN sale...no. The only time MN sales come up is if someone directly asked. I'm not a starving developer. I have the funds to continue the project with or without a MN sale.

Did you also 'test all methods' prior to the chain come crashing down? Every coin has potential code bugs - you just have to look at the Github of any of the top coins to realize that code fixes are put in place pretty frequently.

It's only the worst developers that claim their code is 100% perfect and don't even try to obtain details of the issue - instead claiming your coin as the first in history that is without potential issue. The unbelievable part is that such a claim was made on day 1 and is still being made after a reset of the chain was required and all miners balances on the previous chain were 'nullified'. I laughed at that comment from you on Discord. It just slid off the tongue as if nullifying the coin balances of all your miners was nothing to be in the slightest bit concerned about.

You consistently call me Nick (I believe one of the Stipend developers). That is not me. There is a big difference between 'obsession' and getting burned in a masternode presale before and wanting to help others avoid the same when you spot a blatantly obvious scamcoin.

Nope, I've tested all methods in the code PoW is functional, Masternodes are operable, Zercoin tech is working, and PoS functions perfectly. You are Nick and you're mainly upset that I won't tell you how to integrate a blockchain into your site. Which is incredibly simple for any competent developer.

You actually thought nZercoinStartHeight modified the ability to mint coins, you have no clue what you're talking about.

You claimed that PoS 3.0 was attached to Zerocoin functionality, the only thing you can point out is your ignorance.

There is a mandatory hard fork also required in the Stipend Zenith code,  but much, much sooner (although after your masternodes are sold which is probably all the concerns you). THIS is unfixed code.

When I reveal the issue I'm aware of in your code, you'll see how the Stipend Zenith code issue is much, much more basic - and will cause problems a hell of a lot sooner. I wouldn't expect the issue I'm aware of in a school project, never mind an officially released cryptocurrency.

Personally, I haven't reviewed the Stipend code so cannot comment on the above.

And to say this code is inferior when the old Stipend coin is set to produce infinite blocks but claim a max supply of 19 million is laughable.

else if (pindexBest->nHeight+1 > 840001 && pindexBest->nHeight+1 <= 1890000) {
   // end game - further discussion needed
        nSubsidy = 3 * COIN;
    } else if (pindexBest->nHeight+1 > 1890000) {
   // end game - further discussion needed
        nSubsidy = 3 * COIN;
        nSubsidy >>= ((pindexBest->nHeight + 210000) / 1050000);
    }


There is a mandatory hard fork required in the Stipend code, or it will produce an infinite number of blocks. THIS is unfixed code.

I would be if I owned this coin and was telling everyone "Zenith is superior, period". Did the chain come crashing down before, or after, that period?

You seem upset....

The code is NOT fixed and the issues will come in the very near future. Hopefully, you don't fool too many masternode investors before then.

By the way, NO developer in their right mind tells people that their code is 100% perfect. You were telling everyone the same thing at block 1 of your original chain but, low and behold, the chain came crashing down at block 999.

And here is proof from the Jolt Developers that they worked together, and Nick ran off with their BTC.

Additionally and lastly, we aren't trying to sell MNs. The Stipend devs however have been involved in many scams. Some of them are below

Seather Coin - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annstr-posmasternode-seather-a-decentralized-cloud-storage-4420113

Sigil Coin - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annsgl-sigil-decentralized-0-fee-crowdfunding-2710157

Jolt Gas  - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-c11-mns-jolt-gas-democratized-ev-charging-stations-3008241 - which isn't a scam, but the developer Nick took their BTC to create the blockchain but never followed up with helping them afterwards and just ran off with 0.8 BTC according to the developer there. I'm currently helping them build their new wallets.

And further, the devs are searching through my code to improve their crappy Alpha now.

Sorry, but all the issues are fixed. I'm not sure why you are obsessed with this project. Zenith is superior, period. And we aren't asking for 'Donations' because we blew the entire capital raised from MN sales, and can't afford to maintain the project further due to the price drop.

The good news from the Stipend Zenith developers is the following:


This is their first MANDATORY update.

The bad news is that there are still issues in their code and the next MANDATORY update will be coming soon.

The official link for this coin is:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-stipend-zenith-freelancing-pow-pos-mn-30-quark-airdrops-4641258

This is the unmoderated version that Bitcointalk requests to be created if anyone is unsatisfied with a self-moderated topic. From the original post above:


The dev has created this as a self-moderated topic to allow him to delete anything that would warn would-be masternode investors that it's a scam coin.

There is a single developer of this coin which he describes as a 'better' version of Stipend who he argues have developers of a lesser quality than himself.

The original chain stopped at block 999 due to issues in the developers code. The original chain has been stopped, miners balances are going to be nullified and the new chain will be starting shortly.

As per the developer in relation to Github:


Are you aware of any other coins that are unwilling to publish their code for review? The industry is almost entirely open-source. It's highly unusual to not publish your code and the sole reason I can think of for this is to avoid developers reviewing it and highlighting issues. The prior version of his code did have issues which I highlighted on their Discord and on their Bitcointalk announcement - before all messages were deleted and I was banned from their Discord. This is probably the main influence for not publishing the current version of their code.

After their chain stopped at height 999 due to zerocoin not being implemented properly, the fix involved changing the zerocoin start height (nZerocoinStartHeight) in chainparams.cpp to block 1000000000 - effectively disabling it for 1,902 years. This is one of their main selling points - apart from their 'working product' which is nothing more than a basic template that could be set up by any competent developer in less than 30 minutes.

Masternode sales start soon and will be priced at the same as a Stipend masternode - currently 0.29970 BTC.

Be careful out there.