Topic: [ANN] Whose Bitcoin Is it Anyway? (Read 135 times)

 From a bystander’s viewpoint, it appears that the blind trust story was a way for Wright to explain why he couldn’t access the 1 million BTC he claimed to have owned. Roping in his deceased friend Dave Kleiman seemed a useful way to hide the tracks of his deception.

After all, dead men tell no tales, right?

But their families do. And when the Kleiman estate appeared to lay claim to half of the mythical Bitcoin fortune, that’s where Wright’s troubles began. Now he finds himself indebted to the tune of around $5 billion - and that doesn’t include all the coins from Bitcoin hard forks over the years, which are considered relevant related assets.

Such poetic justice was not lost on either Judge Bloom or Judge Rheinart, both of whom used literary references to color their impressions of the proceedings. Both seem relevant now.

Judge Bloom quoted Sir Walter Scott, writing:

“Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.”

Judge Rheinart referenced 17th-century English playwright John Dryden when he annotated his ruling with the following:

“Apparently, dead men tell no tales, but they (perhaps) send bonded couriers...I completely reject Dr. Wright’s testimony about the alleged Tulip Trust, the alleged encrypted file, and his alleged inability to identify his bitcoin holdings.”

If a courier shows up in 2020 carrying a dead man’s key, then the American judicial system will have been proved wrong. Until then, Craig Wright has a bill to pay.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in the article are solely those of the author and do not represent those of, nor should they be attributed to, CCN.