As for localmonero, this was expected to happen with this platform because of its support for the most important currency in privacy currencies, based on the attack that occurred on all privacy service platforms such as Mix ers.
The use of crypto has spread so much that it no longer subject for ignoring or avoiding dealing with it. On this basis, everything that supports complete privacy is fought, including privacy coins, Mix er platforms, and decentralized platforms. On the other hand, there is still something that cannot be stopped, which is the use of privacy currencies in peer-to-peer transactions because the decentralized Monero network cannot be disrupted by any authority.
It is expected that other applications will be targeted, for which there will be no solution other than activity in the deep web.
Whether Decentralised exchanges or Mixers are not illegal to operate by means of any laws but they stopped the market circulation when they forced exchanges to delisted the Monero means less volume so exchange solely focused on Monero for P2P no longer get business like they do so this happened due to the restrictions on centralized exchanges indirectly affected the market of Monero.
The problem with localmonero is that the platform cannot enforce Kyc identity verification procedures because this fundamentally contradicts the principle of privacy provided by the Monero protocol. This means that there would be no meaning in including this particular currency if the identity of its users were to be verified. This makes it almost impossible for the platform to enforce anti-money laundering measures in any other way.
At the same time, we all know that sooner or later any peer-to-peer exchange platform that does not impose identity verification requirements in accordance with anti-money laundering laws will be eliminated. Since necessity is the mother of invention, either users will get used to using platforms on the hidden web, or decentralized platforms will be launched every time one of them is closed, and we have a good example in Tornadocash because it works as a smart contract as a mix er and not a centralised services platform. Until alternative solutions are found, forums and social media remain the only solution currently available.
Partially, I am not opposed to imposing measures on any of the central platforms to enforce anti-money laundering policies, because the platform itself will become under supervision, and this is required to tighten protection over users’ data and assets.