Author

Topic: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty - Pioneering Peer-to-Peer Finance - Official Thread - page 519. (Read 1276916 times)

sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
Owner of Poloniex
My bitcoind -reindex still sitting there .... No indication of any progress.
I think I'm at somewhere over 48 hours now. Any idea
how to tell if its still going/working ? How long til I should
kill this process ?

Is it using CPU resources? You can also start it with -daemon and -reindex and monitor its progress with getblockcount.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
Owner of Poloniex
Come on lets help Busoni! He's putting us on exchange.

take a loot at https://masterxchange.com

xcp is the same concept

what they do is user who deposits MSC has to specify his MSC address(which is bitcoin address) on the website, and send it to 1MaStErt4XsYHPwfrN9TpgdURLhHTdMenH, and they just check the input of debit transactions to see who send MSC. By doing this, they have one address holding all XCP which is easy to withdraw back to users, no need to spread dust btc across addresses.

If you can support XCP, then you can also use this scheme to support MSC as well, one stone 2 birds, worth your effort no doubt

How do you tell who sent how much? Is there an API call for looking at transactions? It seemed all I could do was check balances.

At any rate, the way I'm trying to do it would be easier for users, and the only reason it's not working is because I can't send XCP. If I can't send XCP, it doesn't really matter how the deposit system works.

The FAQ didn't really help, I had tried those things already. It's kind of annoying, I can't find any more information about the error other than that the tx is rejected.

Joined the IRC channel, no one's there.

It's so close--everything would work if Counterparty would.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com
My bitcoind -reindex still sitting there .... No indication of any progress.
I think I'm at somewhere over 48 hours now. Any idea
how to tell if its still going/working ? How long til I should
kill this process ?
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002
Bitcoin is new, makes sense to hodl.
you guys see this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bank-run-p2p-fiat-bitcoin-exchange-462236 ?

idea is to use "collateral" in place of escrow, it can be used to create trustless p2p ebay,

to me this is definitely the iphone invention

somehow the idea might be able to expand to xcp plaform


Wow, if done right, this basically can solve the whole fiat to crypto problem (that almost totally controlled by banks today).
Any ideas how it can be implemented on top of XCP?

I haven't thought it through but one idea is to implement the "collateral" protocol inside XCP -- 2 parties put up their collateral as XCP or XCP assets, then they exchange what ever they want to exchange, then they just send "collateralRelease", no need to ping pong that complicate multisigs, easy to understand,
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 300
Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder
@PhantomPhreak, with all due respect, have you seen the above information ?

About 'Bank Run'? The protocol is fine, I expect, but it's not super new stuff, and it won't be very smooth.

It doesn't have very much to do with Counterparty. I guess we could reimplement multi-sig transactions ourselves...
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 502
192px versions:



I will make source Illustrator files available if there is interest.
I like the first one!

+1 - imho clean design always better (and saves ink! Smiley )
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 502
you guys see this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bank-run-p2p-fiat-bitcoin-exchange-462236 ?

idea is to use "collateral" in place of escrow, it can be used to create trustless p2p ebay,

to me this is definitely the iphone invention

somehow the idea might be able to expand to xcp plaform


Wow, if done right, this basically can solve the whole fiat to crypto problem (that almost totally controlled by banks today).
Reading it seems ideal for XCP, any ideas how this can be implemented?
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002
Bitcoin is new, makes sense to hodl.
Come on lets help Busoni! He's putting us on exchange.

take a loot at https://masterxchange.com

xcp is the same concept

what they do is user who deposits MSC has to specify his MSC address(which is bitcoin address) on the website, and send it to 1MaStErt4XsYHPwfrN9TpgdURLhHTdMenH, and they just check the input of debit transactions to see who send MSC. By doing this, they have one address holding all XCP which is easy to withdraw back to users, no need to spread dust btc across addresses.

If you can support XCP, then you can also use this scheme to support MSC as well, one stone 2 birds, worth your effort no doubt
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 300
Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder
Can someone tell me why I might get this response when sending XCP?

{"jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": "0", "error": {"message": "Server error", "code": -32000, "data": {"message": "{'message': 'TX rejected', 'code': -22}", "args": ["{'message': 'TX rejected', 'code': -22}"], "type": "BitcoindError"}}}

Yeah, this just isn't going through. Syntax to counterpartyd is correct, in fact it's exactly the same as a previously successful transaction. Here is the raw transaction counterpartyd produces--rejected by bitcoind:

01000000028705906200b0d11087997cd3a29988febeefae3acd9b50210ae46defc49a6b1802000 00000ffffffffa3223ec192a0fbcdc12767b2f58ffaf2c518e8e36360157d3def6b52dd542d4b00 00000000ffffffff036c2a0000000000001976a91435ee14d3ff8ece097df4b5e5370d6908120bf 79688ac6c2a0000000000004751210326594aabcc23ade1f4d35641dec0461c89be318d6939ccd1 169cdeb7721fe6d0211c434e5452505254590000000000000000000000010000000002faf080000 0000052aed0070000000000001976a9140ea4be0d9f68eb471159d30516252cf49d8607f588ac00 000000

not sure if this helps you

https://counterparty.co/faqs/i-got-an-error-tx-rejected-code-22-what-is-that/

ps, there is irc channel irc.counterparty.co
#xcp and #xcp-dev


busoni, does that FAQ page help at all? Is that transaction still being rejected?
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com
@PhantomPhreak, with all due respect, have you seen the above information ?
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002
Bitcoin is new, makes sense to hodl.
you guys see this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bank-run-p2p-fiat-bitcoin-exchange-462236 ?

idea is to use "collateral" in place of escrow, it can be used to create trustless p2p ebay,

to me this is definitely the iphone invention

somehow the idea might be able to expand to xcp plaform
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 504
Can someone tell me why I might get this response when sending XCP?

{"jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": "0", "error": {"message": "Server error", "code": -32000, "data": {"message": "{'message': 'TX rejected', 'code': -22}", "args": ["{'message': 'TX rejected', 'code': -22}"], "type": "BitcoindError"}}}

Yeah, this just isn't going through. Syntax to counterpartyd is correct, in fact it's exactly the same as a previously successful transaction. Here is the raw transaction counterpartyd produces--rejected by bitcoind:

01000000028705906200b0d11087997cd3a29988febeefae3acd9b50210ae46defc49a6b1802000 00000ffffffffa3223ec192a0fbcdc12767b2f58ffaf2c518e8e36360157d3def6b52dd542d4b00 00000000ffffffff036c2a0000000000001976a91435ee14d3ff8ece097df4b5e5370d6908120bf 79688ac6c2a0000000000004751210326594aabcc23ade1f4d35641dec0461c89be318d6939ccd1 169cdeb7721fe6d0211c434e5452505254590000000000000000000000010000000002faf080000 0000052aed0070000000000001976a9140ea4be0d9f68eb471159d30516252cf49d8607f588ac00 000000

not sure if this helps you

https://counterparty.co/faqs/i-got-an-error-tx-rejected-code-22-what-is-that/

ps, there is irc channel irc.counterparty.co
#xcp and #xcp-dev
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com
Come on lets help Busoni! He's putting us on exchange.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
Owner of Poloniex
Should I be posting in the Counterparty forums instead?
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
Owner of Poloniex
Can someone tell me why I might get this response when sending XCP?

{"jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": "0", "error": {"message": "Server error", "code": -32000, "data": {"message": "{'message': 'TX rejected', 'code': -22}", "args": ["{'message': 'TX rejected', 'code': -22}"], "type": "BitcoindError"}}}

Yeah, this just isn't going through. Syntax to counterpartyd is correct, in fact it's exactly the same as a previously successful transaction. Here is the raw transaction counterpartyd produces--rejected by bitcoind:

01000000028705906200b0d11087997cd3a29988febeefae3acd9b50210ae46defc49a6b1802000 00000ffffffffa3223ec192a0fbcdc12767b2f58ffaf2c518e8e36360157d3def6b52dd542d4b00 00000000ffffffff036c2a0000000000001976a91435ee14d3ff8ece097df4b5e5370d6908120bf 79688ac6c2a0000000000004751210326594aabcc23ade1f4d35641dec0461c89be318d6939ccd1 169cdeb7721fe6d0211c434e5452505254590000000000000000000000010000000002faf080000 0000052aed0070000000000001976a9140ea4be0d9f68eb471159d30516252cf49d8607f588ac00 000000
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1010
he who has the gold makes the rules
btw just wanted to mention xcp got mentioned twice at the conference at inside bitcoins berlin, in my presentation of thursday (mostly talked about mastercoin but mentioned ChromaWallet and Counterparty) as well as another speaker on wednesday.

this presentation needs some major work but feel free to use it

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1gyGHGHx7wPg-0J6Nx-M-NjIUbMwWm65F664PBx_9CoM/edit?usp=drive_web
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134
192px versions:



I will make source Illustrator files available if there is interest.
I like the first one!
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com
I have to shut off my internet because I'm moving, but bitcoind -reindex is still running.... What's the timeout ? Is there one ? If I disconnect and then connect to my phones 4G/LTE (very fast) hotspot.. will it just pick up where it left off ? Or once I lost connection am I hosed or ?

Can anyone shed light on that?

bitcoind -reindex has been running for more than 48 hours I believe.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
Owner of Poloniex
Can someone tell me why I might get this response when sending XCP?

{"jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": "0", "error": {"message": "Server error", "code": -32000, "data": {"message": "{'message': 'TX rejected', 'code': -22}", "args": ["{'message': 'TX rejected', 'code': -22}"], "type": "BitcoindError"}}}
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 504
Here a build for MacOS with a GUI :

1) Download: https://github.com/JahPowerBit/counterpartyws/raw/master/dist/counterpartyws.app.zip

2) Unzip

3) Update configuration file ~/Library/Application Support/counterpartyd/counterpartyd.conf

Code: [Select]
[Default]
bitcoind-rpc-connect=192.168.2.254
bitcoind-rpc-port=8332
bitcoind-rpc-user=xxxxx
bitcoind-rpc-password=xxxxx
rpc-password=xxxxx

gui-host=localhost
gui-port=8080
gui-user=xxxxx
gui-password=xxxxx

4) Double click countepartyws.app

5) Open you browser: http://localhost:8080


Source:
https://github.com/JahPowerBit/counterpartyws

Thank you. will test this out later, need to get qt setup again

Exchange solution:
  • Buy Nxtchg
  • Add XCP
  • Implement direct Counterparty interface

 if this interests anyone & another trusted member wished to split the costs, I'd consider this. I think the DEX has it's own merit though, and it's being added to poloniex

192px versions:



I will make source Illustrator files available if there is interest.

Great logo. can't decide between 1 + 2 colorways.
Jump to: