Topic: Anonymint, Smooth and ETH LOL (Read 1426 times)

During his threats is when I decided to buy in just to show support after watching the thread for months, it never ceases to amaze me how easily people are manipulated. Took me quite awhile to break even from all the little girlies that ran like pussy ass bitches back then. No sour grapes here.

Anyway great to see the soap opera saga never gets old on BCT. Where's my popcorn.

Makes note that wall still there, wow maybe adults are behind it?

hey BitcoinShitsprexx no one wants you around here script kiddie loser LOL

Yo @Humpty ya hear that? this one thinks he can put ya back together

Hm, this reminds me that Litecoin story where one guy promised to kill it. Did Monero users beg him not to do that? Litecoin users were crying like girls back those days.

Hey I'm not in this fight, just an observer.

Apparently there's a guy John Connor that has proven several ZD exploits.

I was just trying to find out why Anonymint was so butthurt.

It looks like Smooth roughed him up for no reason.

Bummer.


~BCX~

As for Eth:

Lol this was as entertaining as anything written by Hunter S Thompson.   Don't know what kind of bizarre drama is actually going on here but I will sit back and relax with my Smartfood.

Unabomber manifesto was pretty good and a lot of it is spot on.  A lot of it is somewhat related to the idea of transcendentalism:


Due to:

Self sufficiency = zero sum game against nature

Vertically integrated civilization = zero sum game against each other to see who gets the most, which usually results in trying to fix that terminal, soft form of warfare against each other with socialism, another dead end.

Jeez, not BitcoinEXpress again.

I've been pointing out that BCX is a fraud for some time.

For everyone to know who and what you're facing here, Daniel (BCX) threatened to exploit Monero but failed big time. His sole weapon is air out of his mouth, that's all there is to it *facepalm* and that's all there is to his latest thread that you're reading here *double facepalm*. He's trying to move the markets with fear, uncertainty and doubt.

-mm

Wow, what nice rabbit hole bait.

Anonymint's nearly unimitable crazy style of hustling is an astonishingly close fit for Craig Wright's similar pseudo-polymath approach to bamboozling.  If they aren't the same person, they should be friends!   

Anonymint reportedly (per Risto) has history in the Silver Bug area of the Professional Libertarian community.  EG, he's done business with Jason Hommel.

Which brings us to JVP, another Professional Libertarian with a much stronger presence in the hard money crowd.

Like I said, just here to see what set Anonymint off.

But nonetheless I got about 20 PM's asking the same thing LOL

Based on what I can tell from a 30 minute look at ETH

Peter Vessenes post seems legit.

You might consider ETH



~BCX~

Early 2014 is when Satoshi was hacked, fwiw (I know some have speculated about a Satoshi connection). 

Just for giggles: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14881854.

Just tell me which coin to short.

And don't let Risto to buy you off this time.

Dunno, I might just take him off the deep end and turn him to the dark side.

An evil Anonymint would be fun to watch.

Besides, he probably needs to hit rock bottom and then roll over into a ditch before he gets better.


~BCX~

My vote is for setting up a crowdfund for getting him to a first world location and paying for good medical doctors, who can offer him the services he needs.

A lot of people want that dude around, I'd hope they'd pitch in.

Ok so here's the deal....Let's all just pretend I'm a newbie and asking for clarification here.

I've been out of the loop.



Smooth
I thought you would be way too busy still trying to conceive with Fluffypony to set Anonymint off. Relax chump change I'm out the business of auditing code from shit level devs like you but don't push your luck as I might make a special exception for you.

What the hell did you guys do to Anonymint? I haven't heard from him since the Monero/Aurocoin wars of early 2014 and all of a sudden I get an email manifesto from him that could have been written by Ted Kaczynski aka Unabomber himself expressing an undying love for Smooth accompanied by 11 pages of mathematical proof for an exploit to the anonymity of several block chains. Seems he would like me to avenge the attack on his honor since his current bout with poverty and frail mental health prevent him from doing so himself.

Who the fuck is this HONCHO character fronting his research and offering to pay me for my time? Inquiring minds wanna know LOL.

I did glance over his manifesto and it appears interesting as an academic exercise only but I'm not here to brawl with anybody, just effen curious as to what set Anonymint off so bad  


Anonymint

Section 2.1 has some bad assumptions namely where you state that brute force attacks require complete enumeration and build from there. You didn't take into account indeterminacy for mixed states and randomness as it is related to brute force and the nonsensical assumption of a complete enumeration requirement. Additionally it takes a lot less hash power than you calculate. Step back and look at it again.


ETH

I would look into Peter Vessenes latest post if I were you.



~BCX~