Are you sure you have read what i wrote:
Avalanche:
"Avalanche is a DAG-optimized consensus protocol–high-throughput, parallelizable, and simple to prune."
And I said we also use block lattice DAG...
So you are saying avalanche is not a L1 protocol??? Only blockchains are L1 protocols??? Hmm🤔
Complex DAGs are great for some things and bad for others, like smart contracts, because linearity requirements ... That's why avalanche added a "normal" chain as you call it...
But still I don't really think you understand what a DAG is...
Please read this, it might help you understand:
https://twitter.com/FantomFDN/status/1354095234301489152?t=me91hn1J_EKAdMq25lzTfw&s=19
Topic: Any influencers or funding advisors here? (Read 133 times)
Building a layer 1 protocol. Most similar to Avalance and Nano. If any guys willing to help please message me.
Nano was DAG and it's not a blockchain. It's differet with avalanche as well. Don't you know this? if you don't know about this and then try to take a look at it. Some articles will give you very well explanation about that We have a working prototype and are 10 years plus IT and security specialists with PhDs, so we are not dreaming in clouds...
You have good resources and you can try to open jobs on some sites and another section as well. I just try to remind you that if DAG is not a L1 and this is not even a smartcondrag. DAG used the different mechanism than blockchain to slice the fees. That being said that dag was a bad thing right now. So it's really a robust protocol. Not cheating like Avalanche with this randomized sampling, which will probably cause them major syncronization problems down the road.
I can see that. But how come avalanche got cheating on their randomized sampling? I read some text about it and also Im not so deep with regards to their tech but somehow they have a working protocol at the moment which already up and running.I cam see potential on what you enumerate, but until we can see this running like avax then dont drag their project as if yours are still in the process of theoretical right?
Thanks for the reply.
I am not really bashing avalanche. Just explaining their shortcomings. Usually, in Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (pBFT), you need at least 51% or 50%+1, votes to confirm a decision. They decided that 5,10 or 20% is enough as the probability is high enough that a consensus will be reached. This was done for speed and decentralization. Although the system might work in normal conditions, the system still has potential attack vecors and synchronization issues that might be discovered only with more load and traction. Especially in the case of network partitions, where an attacker can force where the votes should be coming from. The design sounds very risky...
Our system has normal 51%+ voting, speed is gained with vote re-usage and compression and delegation. And we have a demo testnet so it's not theoretical.
So it's really a robust protocol. Not cheating like Avalanche with this randomized sampling, which will probably cause them major syncronization problems down the road.
I can see that. But how come avalanche got cheating on their randomized sampling? I read some text about it and also Im not so deep with regards to their tech but somehow they have a working protocol at the moment which already up and running.I cam see potential on what you enumerate, but until we can see this running like avax then dont drag their project as if yours are still in the process of theoretical right?
Building a layer 1 protocol. Most similar to Avalance and Nano. If any guys willing to help please message me.
We have a working prototype and are 10 years plus IT and security specialists with PhDs, so we are not dreaming in clouds...
Can you showcase the project concept or at least a brief introduction you are building here aside from you mentioned it same like avax and nano.We have a working prototype and are 10 years plus IT and security specialists with PhDs, so we are not dreaming in clouds...
Btw you needed help? Or you are outsourcing for a job like marketing or developer side. If its like that pitch to service announcement and post properly like you are looking for one to work for you.
Yes. Project is flinkcoin.org. It's got a new dPoV, delegated proof of vote consensous alggoritm, and the block lattice structure from Nano. Some of the features:
-Block-lattice DAG
-dPoV consensus (delegated proof of vote)
-Parallel sync chain
-Predefined smart contracts
-Voting packet-based distribution
-Multisig
-No fees
-Payment reference number
-Payment requests
-Time-limited transactions (now or never)
So it's really a robust protocol. Not cheating like Avalanche with this randomized sampling, which will probably cause them major syncronization problems down the road.
Include what's the exchange working with you. I'm not an expert but there could be other members in here that you're looking for.
Paying in altcoins would make it on the Marketplace(Altcoins) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=161.0)
Also, try to post it on the Project Development (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=12.0).
Paying in altcoins would make it on the Marketplace(Altcoins) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=161.0)
Also, try to post it on the Project Development (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=12.0).
We are working with some local exchanges. Will try to post also to other sections. Maybe will have more success. Thank you!
Building a layer 1 protocol. Most similar to Avalance and Nano. If any guys willing to help please message me.
We have a working prototype and are 10 years plus IT and security specialists with PhDs, so we are not dreaming in clouds...
Can you showcase the project concept or at least a brief introduction you are building here aside from you mentioned it same like avax and nano.We have a working prototype and are 10 years plus IT and security specialists with PhDs, so we are not dreaming in clouds...
Btw you needed help? Or you are outsourcing for a job like marketing or developer side. If its like that pitch to service announcement and post properly like you are looking for one to work for you.
Building a layer 1 protocol. Most similar to Avalance and Nano. If any guys willing to help please message me.
We have a working prototype and are 10 years plus IT and security specialists with PhDs, so we are not dreaming in clouds...
We have a working prototype and are 10 years plus IT and security specialists with PhDs, so we are not dreaming in clouds...
Jump to: