Author

Topic: Are 1000-random-character passwords good enough to be the same for all accounts? (Read 526 times)

sr. member
Activity: 258
Merit: 250
If you use them on all your accounts then that's a problem still. One account gets compromised everything goes down.
sr. member
Activity: 303
Merit: 250
It is good enough for all accounts. But what if you lost all the back up of your password? You cannot memorize all of it and later it will be a reason for the lost of your accounts.
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
Louis Vuitton
No, it's a bad security practice. Get a password manager such as 1Password, or Lastpass, and just keep generating different passwords for each website.
hero member
Activity: 741
Merit: 500
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
brute force is not the only way to get passwords

keyloggers and sites vulnerabilities may expose your password, and a 1 million letters password would make no difference

so it is not a good idea
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1023
The whole point of not reusing passwords is that if one site leaks your password, it doesn't matter how good your password is. Hackers are just as good as you are at copy-pasting your long password into every site they can think of. Roll Eyes

This! You should use a unique password for every site to remain secure. If a site is compromised or has a malicious administrator, someone could obtain your password and simply try it at other sites that you frequent. I usually recommend using a secure password manager with a strong master password to store unique passwords for the sites you are registered on.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
Nope.. it would be bad.

All it takes is one site you go to that gets compromised.
A site may have your password stored in plain text then they have your ass hard !

Don't do that !

Check out Password Depot if you are on Windows or other password manager programs.
PD has a built in password creator too.


Oh and most have a limit of 8 or 12 or 24 chars etc.
legendary
Activity: 4542
Merit: 3393
Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023
The whole point of not reusing passwords is that if one site leaks your password, it doesn't matter how good your password is. Hackers are just as good as you are at copy-pasting your long password into every site they can think of. Roll Eyes
member
Activity: 139
Merit: 20
as much as I know it can be brute forced but it would take time since it's a long one also if someone gets this password by some way he will know basiclly for all your accounts since youre using it for all.
hero member
Activity: 777
Merit: 1003
Lose the flash drive and lose all your accounts? All your eggs in one basket?
Centralization, we don't support that here.  Cheesy
full member
Activity: 137
Merit: 100
On my flash drive, actually. The purpose of this is to plug in the flash drive whenever you are asked for your password. And whenever you create a new account, a new 1000-character key is generated for each account and saved on the drive. This idea is only in concept stage.
hero member
Activity: 777
Merit: 1003
Where are you going to save this password? On your computer, phone, etc.? What if your house burns down and you can't save your computer, phone, etc.? Now all of you accounts are lost too?
copper member
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
Because re-using the same password always is such a great idea, right?
full member
Activity: 137
Merit: 100
Apparently Twitter and Facebook do, and so do Microsoft.
hero member
Activity: 777
Merit: 1003
Paranoid much?  Roll Eyes

I agree that many sites would not be able to deal with that.
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1087
are you planning on memorizing that? i'm gonna guess not in which case you may as well have some more 1000 character passwords. i'm not sure many sites could handle ones of that size.
full member
Activity: 137
Merit: 100
Think of passwords like this:

Code:
*wnGb$*#WcbJPIw6L!qp3J5gWt%lprQd8q9*@KMnZJj(PFgF7*mPhZ&cEkfX!SKOfQq_5qpJ)QhN&4NI*Es_FSzlew_pCDlgINhx$)B7X)D6zK1Pay5Cg!D8*MAPqV4bmf)VwU8SdQKpC1C%Xe_F(bBMiQAL8u9n47R&9uVvGIBECi!KWLi5K_GbOR#BSB9N2xGwJ0RGgMQP2HQxoSQZ8^eDwg$YJv8H5vQ4@^qp#2Cq)Tp7+HvPT(5gRzEXeiki*14Z!@DYQ3%pHn!b@0UsT5W4MQI8sYlbWR*I4)j_Od0ud5ThyDP*hc6l2Dls_jAnMFfmETeNAEg@uWbHMc1iZ7_TInt_FlXY8)JVvAN8kE400nh+9()F8C66sL0b@bHyqb&SB54KVrN9)g&dkn9NvFB7Ix!f+zEzGc2m5qN_DYMVl@rdT)dC5Ns7T7o2Dk*IzNtPbRxuuj7Y9XG&2Mg!4LHe7Cp)2NCHKSUK%89T6(V5b9Z1i6lP9rMjKsghll5zrujC3#13%!NK4_^BY25lHodw@+2ZGUaXd7r4%JvQk+IjLKEGi241Q9vxKEldS1PMDQwQ7Dj&@hpkzVfQX%^yP!UQ1Zk1_3)hEZbVqPdG#JmBWJ!jUgOvQIc4dVW@gzDVAvCfvI!poCDMUKmK5nCKvB@%6S4NOEFkv@5mEmvJgS3i&RwSnN9G26!w8KWjwX@%Mf&%MMP(RDF42nhDCi2iSS*!E7_C_jEuhwr_yzv$RVTG(smIR9Kh(TqHR!lYPKNPBRNojqNBLUj!ZIlHbZKY6GDV@bP)mZU6Yo$8bii#fsX%!%A*8os^xwj34*W3lT191uX4iF1+LT(sZ$(5yUUH4ncfK1OpX4Os2sK$EJdY4V!rr3STO!7_4hDAtoYq*N6PT(yt@Ay8D$2(15ny3npiEhQvG(B*N64N9MRzXufq8(O!0+LCoLqd&n@Ix2RBgAxI70RHfQFHhtO_Ww^@t0YS%Uus$LAOW2g*)m4iOUSW

Would this be stable enough to be the same for all accounts?
Jump to: