Author

Topic: Are coins with huge whole digits a good thing? (Read 755 times)

full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 117
▲ Portable backup power source for mining.
November 24, 2016, 02:41:46 PM
#14
coins with low digits died
coins with high digits died and survived

but I only know Dogecoin with many digits and long term survival

I don't think many digits coins are bad, but for some reason the serious developers most of times decide to use
Huh

...decide to use ... what?
Coins with low digits died?

coins with high digits died and survived
but I only know Dogecoin with many digits and long term survival
What exactly is meant?
member
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
coins with low digits died
coins with high digits died and survived

but I only know Dogecoin with many digits and long term survival

I don't think many digits coins are bad, but for some reason the serious developers most of times decide to use
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Yeah usually even though its a generalization.



But make sure you look into the specifics before just jumping into  because you see bigger digits
hero member
Activity: 804
Merit: 500
DAO ↔ DApp
I didn't think it mattered but professional investors and traders seem to like around 10 to 30 million coins. It has to do with the ability to move the coins price up and down. Too many or too little coins effects this process.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 251
It shouldn't matter,  but kinda like when a stock splits up, people get all excited.   There's something in whole numbers that appeals to people's need to have large numbers of things.  That's my thought.  Personally I like dealing with big digits,  or at least not very small decimal amounts like you git with bitcoin.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 117
▲ Portable backup power source for mining.
It doesn't matter!
If the coins are too small, use kilo-coins, mega-coins, or exa-coins.
If they are too big, use milli-coins, micro-coins, or femto-coins.
It is annoying to see people discuss "sub-cent" coins as distinct than "valuable coins", it is the same thing.
The market cap, how the log of the value changes, and the technical features are all infinity times more important.
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1087
I completely agree. It's not good for marketing and branding purposes when an expensive thing costs 0.0000..something.  

yup. it's dumb and goes totally against human nature. bitcoin really should've done something about this in the early days. i don't care what anyone here says, they're already indoctrinated. a normal person wants whole units, not fractions.

better to start off with vast amounts of units and hope it goes up than have to spend the rest of your life counting and recounting the zeroes before the amount you wanna spend.
sr. member
Activity: 433
Merit: 250
We are the first to program your future (c)
I don't think it's a critical issue--in fact, it probably doesn't even matter much.  However, one of the things I like about DOGE is that you're not buying, selling, or using decimal amounts.  I just don't like it, and it's probably for Freudian psychological penis reasons.  Dash is valued such that it's almost perfect with respect to using whole units.  Bitcoin is short-dicked in that respect, but I can't really knock it.

I completely agree. It's not good for marketing and branding purposes when an expensive thing costs 0.0000..something.  
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
I don't think it's a critical issue--in fact, it probably doesn't even matter much.  However, one of the things I like about DOGE is that you're not buying, selling, or using decimal amounts.  I just don't like it, and it's probably for Freudian psychological penis reasons.  Dash is valued such that it's almost perfect with respect to using whole units.  Bitcoin is short-dicked in that respect, but I can't really knock it.
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1451
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
It's not a good thing. Cryptocurrencies are divisible down to multiple decimal points, fees might remove some flexibility from that but adding an unsubstantial amount of coins plagues flexibility of a  digitalc currency a whole lot more. There arevmany coins that failed to succeed with their quantity being the leading factor. In reality, no major trade medium has a value that low to be traded with a coin that can bebmined by the billions in each block so really there isn't much point for such "currencies" to exist other than experimentation.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
I think it is better to keep it manageable and easy to read. Having to pay 100000000 of a coin for like only $2.70 is not easy to read it makes it difficult to.

Then you bet the other extreme where you using tiny fractions but that has not happened very much only with bitcoin and it is not so bad. Like most things in life you need a balance.
copper member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 899
🖤😏
It is good in your dreams like imagine what happens if each coin rises to $1 then you could become filthy rich just by mining a few blocks Smiley.
Not a good thing.
hero member
Activity: 1150
Merit: 502
Yes. If the number of fractional digits is something out of this world, peg it to alts, it will move the decimal point to the right depending on BTC:ALT or FIAT:ALT exchange rate and allow for more convenient conversion.
full member
Activity: 137
Merit: 100
On the Altcoin announcements page, I posted about ByteUSD, a coin that was originally meant to be traded for US dollars as a way to upgrade from fiat altogether.  It is forked from ForkNote, and you can find the Config code to use with ForkNote on the comments.

Now here's the mining-related question: with ByteUSD, you can mine over a billion coins in one block. Aside from the doubts of the value of the coin, is it a good idea to mine a coin that spits out lots of coins at once? If so, would it be better off unpegged to any other currency, crypto or fiat?
Jump to: