Author

Topic: Are gambling games with BTC legal? (Read 2956 times)

sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
July 08, 2013, 08:05:05 AM
#35
We kind of went off the original topic here, which was are online casinos using bitcoin legal. We will actually soon be provably fair too, but that's not really the point. The Cereus scam, can be implemented in any poker site, provably fair or not. Revealing the cards on the table to certain players doesn't require any false generation of cards in a particular order. Kahwanake is the most shady jurisdiction of all, not recognized by any government. It is a total scam. That's why they were able to run such a corrupted organization. There is no control in Kahwanake as long as you pay their fees. The only place that is worse than Kahwanake is Costa Rica. Most players believe that there are actual licenses and control over there. But there aren't. You just incorporate a dummy corporation and you are good to go. That's the reason many countries in Europe closed their markets for non-EU gambling companies. So they could filter the potentially shady jurisdictions and companies. 5 years ago you could launch an online casino and noone would ask you a single question. You could have all the payment methods, service US players, have a stable bank. Nowadays without a proper license you can't even get a bank account, let alone payment processing. The offshore gambling businesses are either dieing slowly or moving to controlled jurisdictions with licensing. Good examples for that are bodog - who is slowly leaving Kawhanake and moving to Europe & Asia, many of the Curacao operations are moving to Malta or Isle of Man, PokerStars moved to Isle of Man and so on. My point is online gambling becomes more and more regulated on a daily basis, and it won't pass the bitcoin casinos and it is coming rather sooner than later in my opinion.
hero member
Activity: 626
Merit: 500
https://satoshibet.com
July 08, 2013, 05:58:39 AM
#34
It's already proven that Cereus tampered with their software, putting in a hack that allowed them to see the players card. It's not RNG related but it is a software hack. My argument remains valid.

Bit777 It's not my point to attack you or your casino. I know you licensed your casino software, you are not provably fair, etc and because of that you may think i was "bashing" your casino. I'm truly not, haven't played on there but seems like a ok casino and your undoubtedly run a healthy operation.
I just LOVE the other casinos who do go over and beyond to create provably fair, completely new gaming experiences because Bitcoin for the first time in internet gambling history, lets them.

I'm not going to discuss gaming fees and such, it's way too early for that. Bitcoin is not even a real currency yet and who knows what will happen in the future. Your operational cost numbers are a little exaggerated imo, don't make it look like dooms day and inevitably every casino should close and give up.
Right now it's important that we support every new Bitcoin casino that opens up big or small, each of them is a great thing and can only help Bitcoin forward.
I know we don't have licenses yet, but that's why Provably Fair is a perfect "substitute" right now for the bitcoin community.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
July 08, 2013, 01:33:42 AM
#33
And the giant online casinos could care less about being provably fair. It's only us smaller single owner / operator types who have to have a provably fair system.

They might care about it though, if they save on licensing costs, if they don't have to pay someone to be gambling audited or compliant. But only if it is not required. Their industry requires it though, and competitors will be quick to complain to the authorities against online casinos that do not have proper documents or audited fairness standards, no matter how provably fair it is.

You are correct. They could care less about it. From another point of view though, they are much more proven to be fair compared to the provably fair casinos, as they get audited on an hourly basis, and all the software is tested to be fair in laboratories. As a matter of fact, all of the certified lab software providers are directly linked to the governing jurisdictions, such as Malta, UK, Alderney, etc. Every single bet is instantly logged in the governing authority servers. If there is a slightest chance that it is not fair, the casino directly loses its license. So on top of that, why would they bother implementing a provably fair system...

Disagree completely, "tested to be fair in laboratories", I think you are picturing it a litle too much fairy tale. In practice everything happens more lax then you imagine..
Example? Absolute Poker was licensed by a respectable gaming commission. Didn't stop them from cheating the players for massive amounts through software hacks (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cereus_Poker_Network)

Provably Fair is a big innovation, it may never see adaption by the industry which I understand, but it's perfectly in line with the values any decent bitcoin casino deems worthy. And at the moment a LOT of bitcoin players appreciate and prefer it above anything else. I still see no reason why any serious Bitcoin Casino would not make their casino Provably fair and I would strongly recommend against playing on any casino that is not.

On your earlier remark of not being able to compete with the giant players if they adopt bitcoin in the near future, I again have to disagree somewhat. (Although of course it would be very heavy competition)

- The chance they will offer the ability to gamble completely using bitcoin (not just converting your bitcoin to fiat) is very improbable.
- Most bitcoin casinos offer custom made software, that is completely unique to that casino. Regular casinos generally offer the same cookie cutter 10-year old roulette flash games over and over, with little creativity and completely dependent of their game licensees. Many of the bitcoin casinos right now, don't be mistaken, CAN compete on software today.



There are currently over 350 different casino software providers in the world, accounting for probably 8-10000 different games. Saying "Regular casinos generally offer the same cookie cutter 10-year old roulette flash games over and over" is a nonsense. And how is your casino war game unique or different from ours for example? The graphics might be, but after all its the same standard casino game that everyone else has... It's the same game logic, the same user experience, the same house edge, etc.

Cereus wasn't rigging the RNG, it was allowing employees to play against their players with an option to view cards. So this is not a valid argument.

"Disagree completely, "tested to be fair in laboratories", I think you are picturing it a litle too much fairy tale. In practice everything happens more lax then you imagine.."    I am speaking out of practice (12 years experience in online gambling). It is so stressful to get an RNG or a game certified to be fair that you can't imagine. Every single game is being tested with various tests, such as Chi-Square Tests, Serial Correlation Test, Poisson Distribution Test, Frequency Test, Diehard tests, and so on. After the tests are complete, the system is hooked up to the central server and the code is being checked every month for discrepancies. There are no speculations or child play there. To get a casino with about 50 games certified will cost you around $70,000 and ~ 5 months of testing in the lab.

On a side note related to that, how many of the casinos here are tested with these tests? They might be provably fair, but what if their RNGs are biased or inconsistent in their generation? I've spoken to a few other operators on this forum who didn't even understand how to random generate properly and what technology to use and were and currently are running games. So how safe are the players?

Now regarding competition if it goes mainstream. Even out of the operational costs, most of the sites around here will close. How many will be able to afford a 100k license, a 70k lab test, and 5-10k a month in just licensing fees and taxes. And where will the players prefer to play? In a casino that has a license and is secure and controlled by a serious authority, or in a one that doesn't. So how exactly will you remain competitive?

(not trying to bash you, just being realistic)
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
July 08, 2013, 01:06:58 AM
#32
Disagree completely, "tested to be fair in laboratories", I think you are picturing it a litle too much fairy tale. In practice everything happens more lax then you imagine..
Example? Absolute Poker was licensed by a respectable gaming commission. Didn't stop them from cheating the players for massive amounts through software hacks (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cereus_Poker_Network)

Well, I frankly think little of most of these gaming commissions.  Particularly the Kahnawake Gaming Commission, which resisted suspending these clowns for far too long.

However, the software hacks were not related to the deal.  The deal could have been (and as far as I know was) perfectly fair.  The problem was insiders had access to information (like other player's hole cards) that they could exploit to cheat.  Similarly, even without insider access, players can collude by sharing hole card information.  In that case, as well, the RNG dealing the cards would be perfectly fair.  But players would be obtaining an unfair (and against the rules) advantage by cheating.

+1
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1005
July 07, 2013, 09:51:03 PM
#31
Disagree completely, "tested to be fair in laboratories", I think you are picturing it a litle too much fairy tale. In practice everything happens more lax then you imagine..
Example? Absolute Poker was licensed by a respectable gaming commission. Didn't stop them from cheating the players for massive amounts through software hacks (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cereus_Poker_Network)

Well, I frankly think little of most of these gaming commissions.  Particularly the Kahnawake Gaming Commission, which resisted suspending these clowns for far too long.

However, the software hacks were not related to the deal.  The deal could have been (and as far as I know was) perfectly fair.  The problem was insiders had access to information (like other player's hole cards) that they could exploit to cheat.  Similarly, even without insider access, players can collude by sharing hole card information.  In that case, as well, the RNG dealing the cards would be perfectly fair.  But players would be obtaining an unfair (and against the rules) advantage by cheating.
hero member
Activity: 626
Merit: 500
https://satoshibet.com
July 07, 2013, 08:51:59 PM
#30
And the giant online casinos could care less about being provably fair. It's only us smaller single owner / operator types who have to have a provably fair system.

They might care about it though, if they save on licensing costs, if they don't have to pay someone to be gambling audited or compliant. But only if it is not required. Their industry requires it though, and competitors will be quick to complain to the authorities against online casinos that do not have proper documents or audited fairness standards, no matter how provably fair it is.

You are correct. They could care less about it. From another point of view though, they are much more proven to be fair compared to the provably fair casinos, as they get audited on an hourly basis, and all the software is tested to be fair in laboratories. As a matter of fact, all of the certified lab software providers are directly linked to the governing jurisdictions, such as Malta, UK, Alderney, etc. Every single bet is instantly logged in the governing authority servers. If there is a slightest chance that it is not fair, the casino directly loses its license. So on top of that, why would they bother implementing a provably fair system...

Disagree completely, "tested to be fair in laboratories", I think you are picturing it a litle too much fairy tale. In practice everything happens more lax then you imagine..
Example? Absolute Poker was licensed by a respectable gaming commission. Didn't stop them from cheating the players for massive amounts through software hacks (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cereus_Poker_Network)

Provably Fair is a big innovation, it may never see adaption by the industry which I understand, but it's perfectly in line with the values any decent bitcoin casino deems worthy. And at the moment a LOT of bitcoin players appreciate and prefer it above anything else. I still see no reason why any serious Bitcoin Casino would not make their casino Provably fair and I would strongly recommend against playing on any casino that is not.

On your earlier remark of not being able to compete with the giant players if they adopt bitcoin in the near future, I again have to disagree somewhat. (Although of course it would be very heavy competition)

- The chance they will offer the ability to gamble completely using bitcoin (not just converting your bitcoin to fiat) is very improbable.
- Most bitcoin casinos offer custom made software, that is completely unique to that casino. Regular casinos generally offer the same cookie cutter 10-year old roulette flash games over and over, with little creativity and completely dependent of their game licensees. Many of the bitcoin casinos right now, don't be mistaken, CAN compete on software today.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1005
July 07, 2013, 02:20:27 PM
#29
And the giant online casinos could care less about being provably fair. It's only us smaller single owner / operator types who have to have a provably fair system.

The giant online casinos are under a considerable amount of scrutiny, and would be caught by people like the Wizard of Odds and others if the deal was rigged.  One problem with one kind of gambling (poker) though is that the issue isn't really whether the deal is fair.  No major site has ever been caught rigging the RNG, and only one very early on (Planet Poker) was found to be using a blatantly broken RNG (it was basically totally cracked). 

The problem in online poker is much less the deal than that you might be cheated by other players colluding, something that can and does happen pretty often.  It would be, in the first place, highly impractical to generate provably fair numbers for the largest of the online poker rooms (or casinos for that matter), but even if you did it, you wouldn't have eliminated the main source of getting cheated.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
July 05, 2013, 02:01:27 AM
#28
And the giant online casinos could care less about being provably fair. It's only us smaller single owner / operator types who have to have a provably fair system.

They might care about it though, if they save on licensing costs, if they don't have to pay someone to be gambling audited or compliant. But only if it is not required. Their industry requires it though, and competitors will be quick to complain to the authorities against online casinos that do not have proper documents or audited fairness standards, no matter how provably fair it is.

You are correct. They could care less about it. From another point of view though, they are much more proven to be fair compared to the provably fair casinos, as they get audited on an hourly basis, and all the software is tested to be fair in laboratories. As a matter of fact, all of the certified lab software providers are directly linked to the governing jurisdictions, such as Malta, UK, Alderney, etc. Every single bet is instantly logged in the governing authority servers. If there is a slightest chance that it is not fair, the casino directly loses its license. So on top of that, why would they bother implementing a provably fair system...
legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1912
The Concierge of Crypto
July 04, 2013, 10:56:11 PM
#27
And the giant online casinos could care less about being provably fair. It's only us smaller single owner / operator types who have to have a provably fair system.

They might care about it though, if they save on licensing costs, if they don't have to pay someone to be gambling audited or compliant. But only if it is not required. Their industry requires it though, and competitors will be quick to complain to the authorities against online casinos that do not have proper documents or audited fairness standards, no matter how provably fair it is.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1005
July 04, 2013, 12:54:50 PM
#26
Are blanket statements with no qualification or context provided correct?

All blanket statements are complete bullshit.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
July 04, 2013, 11:52:08 AM
#25
Yes. It will happen the same way as it happened in the dotcom era. Smaller establishments will die, larger ones will takeover. Except that now there is a major threat for us. *In the case* bitcoin goes heavily into mainstream within the next 2-3 years, I don't see any of us compete with billion dollar establishments with thousands of people staff, such as pokerstars, bwin.party, ladbrokes and others. Right now a lot of the big companies are looking at btc as a gambling payment method due to the ease of use, NO transaction fees (processors usually charge 4-5%) and no chargebacks (a good 2-3% of any real money online casino right now). So even if it doesn't go mainstream, large gambling companies still have a very good use of it, and they consider it already. There have been many talks on the latest igaming shows about bitcoin. The only thing stopping them right now is the volatility of bitcoin. It still seems too insecure for the larger establishments. Otherwise it is a no brainer. You have 200mln a year revenue. 8% of that ~ 16mln goes into processing costs. You have this FREE, instant, secure option to save this 16mln and turn them into profit...You don't need much of a brain to see how it will benefit your business.
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1002
July 04, 2013, 11:31:14 AM
#24
The more bitcoin goes into the mainstream, the less of "single developer dice/casino game sites" will be able to exist.
And more single developer/operator anonymous (TOR, abuse-resistant hosting) Bitcoin casinos Grin
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
July 04, 2013, 10:33:36 AM
#22
Yes, this is what I am saying. "In Holland". It doesn't mean you are equally legal in the rest of the world. It only means you are legal in Holland. Also fyi, there is a law coming up soon which will regulate online gambling, and I know your stance right now is that it is legal as bitcoin is not considered money, therefore not gambling, but we will see how it will play out after the law passes.

 http://www.tax-news.com/news/Netherlands_Eyes_20_Online_Gambling_Tax____60889.html


first, this law is aimed at foreign market and I am dutch. Second, the dutch parliament has stated that bitcoin meets only 2 of the 4 criteria with which the law defines money and thus no financial licenses are needed for exchange, securities, financial services and gaming. This has been an explicit statement in Dutch parliament and as gambling is defined as playing for money, these new laws wont apply to bitcoin poker


This could be correct for the Netherlands, but it doesn't open your road for other countries where the laws might be different just because you are based in a jurisdiction where it is legal.

Anyways. Other opinions are welcome Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1002
July 04, 2013, 10:24:26 AM
#21
The main issue is if bitcoins can be qualified as 'money by other means'. To give a comparision: in Vegas, people are not playing with real cash, but with chips and these chips are regarded as money by other means, making it gambling.
Casino chips have real monetary value (from point of law they are IOUs issued by casino).

Bitcoin have not yet recognized as any type of property, therefore gambling with it is in grey area, which means that government may legislate acts at any moment and BTC casino owners will have to close their businesses or go underground.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
No longer satoshipoker.org - Can't change avatar
July 04, 2013, 08:06:17 AM
#20
Yes, this is what I am saying. "In Holland". It doesn't mean you are equally legal in the rest of the world. It only means you are legal in Holland. Also fyi, there is a law coming up soon which will regulate online gambling, and I know your stance right now is that it is legal as bitcoin is not considered money, therefore not gambling, but we will see how it will play out after the law passes.

 http://www.tax-news.com/news/Netherlands_Eyes_20_Online_Gambling_Tax____60889.html


first, this law is aimed at foreign market and I am dutch. Second, the dutch parliament has stated that bitcoin meets only 2 of the 4 criteria with which the law defines money and thus no financial licenses are needed for exchange, securities, financial services and gaming. This has been an explicit statement in Dutch parliament and as gambling is defined as playing for money, these new laws wont apply to bitcoin poker
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
July 04, 2013, 07:21:02 AM
#19
Yes, this is what I am saying. "In Holland". It doesn't mean you are equally legal in the rest of the world. It only means you are legal in Holland. Also fyi, there is a law coming up soon which will regulate online gambling, and I know your stance right now is that it is legal as bitcoin is not considered money, therefore not gambling, but we will see how it will play out after the law passes.

 http://www.tax-news.com/news/Netherlands_Eyes_20_Online_Gambling_Tax____60889.html

sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
No longer satoshipoker.org - Can't change avatar
July 04, 2013, 06:56:50 AM
#18
The main issue is if bitcoins can be qualified as 'money by other means'. To give a comparision: in Vegas, people are not playing with real cash, but with chips and these chips are regarded as money by other means, making it gambling.

What you should look for is a country which specificly states that bitcoin isn't money and therefor none of the monetary rules apply (including gambling, securities and exchange). A decent example is The Netherlands...

This doesn't really help from a jurisdictional standpoint though. It only avoids the need of a gambling license. He will still have to comply with the laws of each country from which he takes players.
In Holland bitcoin poker is exactly equal to Zynga poker. Just as any tourist is allowed to visit our coffeeshops, they are allowed to use our services as they obey the dutch law
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
July 04, 2013, 06:41:10 AM
#17
The main issue is if bitcoins can be qualified as 'money by other means'. To give a comparision: in Vegas, people are not playing with real cash, but with chips and these chips are regarded as money by other means, making it gambling.

What you should look for is a country which specificly states that bitcoin isn't money and therefor none of the monetary rules apply (including gambling, securities and exchange). A decent example is The Netherlands...

This doesn't really help from a jurisdictional standpoint though. It only avoids the need of a gambling license. He will still have to comply with the laws of each country from which he takes players.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
No longer satoshipoker.org - Can't change avatar
July 04, 2013, 06:33:59 AM
#16
The main issue is if bitcoins can be qualified as 'money by other means'. To give a comparision: in Vegas, people are not playing with real cash, but with chips and these chips are regarded as money by other means, making it gambling.

What you should look for is a country which specificly states that bitcoin isn't money and therefor none of the monetary rules apply (including gambling, securities and exchange). A decent example is The Netherlands...
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
July 04, 2013, 04:47:09 AM
#15
Depends obviously on the country...
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
July 04, 2013, 04:44:12 AM
#14
Also Russia is not a good example as online gambling is heavily illegal over there.
Russia does not recognize virtual currency as money or even tangible asset, therefore running Bitcoin-only casino in Russia is the same as running non-commercial gambling site like pokerth.com (which is legal of course).

Tell this to the Russian government... I can bet my house they won't care, if they see a roulette table on your site or a slot machine, they will shut you down like 1 2 3. Online casinos are illegal in Russia as well as land-based casinos, except for one particular territory, which is supposed to be the next Las Vegas, but hasn't been built yet. There have already been numerous takedowns with arrests and prison sentences. Goldfishka is a good example of such a case. There is even a casino blacklist, where most online casinos land eventually and are being blocked by the ISPs. The system in Russia doesn't really work the way many of you would imagine. To run an online casino there you need to pay "security" to influent underground people (vory v zakone) and they expect it, who can secure you the government to not touch you and let you operate. This style of operations accounts for the whole CHГ. You might try to run "rogue" today, but what will happen when they knock on your door tomorrow? Without paying the appropriate amounts, you have no chance of success in Russia, you might even get killed.

In Europe it depends on the country:

France, Italy, Bulgaria, Spain, Germany - These countries have their own licenses, which an online casino or a sportsbook must have in order to operate and not end up in a legal battle with the particular Government.

UK - this is the only place where outside licensing is recognized, but only if it is from another EU state. A Curacao or Kahwanake license for example is not recognized.

Netherlands, Romania, and the rest are all either in the process of legalizing it with their own particular licenses or consider doing it. They are still considered grey area by many large operators.

(might have missed a country or two, but you get the picture)

China - Online gambling is illegal, and most of the activity is ran through the Triad networks of agents on street level.

Canada - BC has it's own license. The rest of Canada can be ran with a Kahwanake license.

USA - Until 2006 online gambling was considered grey area. Then the UIGEA was introduced, which outlawed the payment methods used for online gambling. However the gambling activity by itself remained intact. In 2011, DOJ released an opinion that the Wire Act as well as UIGEA are mostly set towards sports betting. This opened up a whole avenue for land-casino to legalize online casinos and poker. A federal bill won't pass anytime soon, not in the next 2-3 years (my opinion), however many States have introduced their own legislature controlling it, such as Delaware, Washington, NJ, Nevada, Illinois, New York. In some it is legal in others it is illegal. Other states are in the process.

It doesn't matter where you are incorporated, you need to comply with the laws of the Governments of the countries from which you accept players.

What is gambling by definition?

Gambling is the wagering of money or something of material value (referred to as "the stakes") on an event with an uncertain outcome with the primary intent of winning additional money and/or material goods. Gambling thus requires three elements be present: consideration, chance and prize.

Where does bitcoin stand and why all the "bitcoin isn't a currency and therefore it is legal" talks are irrelevant:


At current timing bitcoin is undefined by any government. They still wonder what exactly they should do with it and how should they tax it and regulate it. "Is it a bird, is it a plane, or a superman???" However, the moment bitcoin is fully legalized, it will either be considered "money" or "something of material value" (commodity). In either case, any online casino that accepts bitcoin payments (including us) will fall under the same rules and regulations as any standard online casino. It will need to comply with the particular laws of each government it operates in, or fall in the "illegal" sector. On top of that ALL Governments are well known for arrests, court cases and hefty fines and backtaxes. A good reference would be the sportingbet and partygaming and of course pokerstars settlements with the US, sportingbet paying backtaxes in Spain, partygaming CEO currently being indicted in France for backtaxes for before it was regulated and the list goes on and on.

Consider the bitcoin gambling business a grey area, which will eventually be regulated.

The SD and StrikeSapphire owners get this quite well and that is why they don't accept any US players. On our end we have made the decision to accept US players and we know the future complications involved.


Note: Consider this a personal opinion.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 522
July 04, 2013, 04:02:43 AM
#13
Are blanket statements with no qualification or context provided correct?
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
July 04, 2013, 03:32:17 AM
#12
it is legal in Russia. Grin
legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1912
The Concierge of Crypto
July 03, 2013, 10:48:50 PM
#11
Bitcoin was called a commodity by the facebook twins who started an investment thingie. Winklevoss or something, I forget.
hero member
Activity: 980
Merit: 502
July 03, 2013, 09:34:25 PM
#10
Short answer:  probably not, if you're talking about the United States. 

Long answer:  it's complicated.

mhmm lol
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1005
July 03, 2013, 09:29:51 PM
#9
Short answer:  probably not, if you're talking about the United States. 

Long answer:  it's complicated.
hero member
Activity: 683
Merit: 500
July 03, 2013, 05:37:28 PM
#8
Here is my point of view on legality.

Take Runescape as a prime example.

I'm sure Governments know that ("Runescape Gold") has been gambled and people buy the Runescape Gold with no legal issues, except for the creators ("Jagex LTD") can ban you for buying gold.

Bitcoin is much similar to that of Runescape Gold ("Farming Gold, Mining Gold") Same aspect, except think of mining as botting. Government didn't care about botting, but Jagex decided to take legal action to the owners of these botting softwares. Nobody is taking legal action of you using the Mining Software, and it's the similar aspect, so government isn't taking it either.

Bitcoin is Virtual, and not "YET" legal tender as a currency say in Walmart, or even most stores. Where as some stores do have it, it's still considered virtual as you are never PHYSICALLY giving them a bitcoin, or bitcent, you are virtually transfering in exchange for goods.


So I would say you can host it in the US. But be very careful on how you word things on your website :-)
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
Acc bought - used solely for signature testing
July 03, 2013, 05:00:23 PM
#7
Hi Guys

Yesterday i was talking with a friend of mine about opening a casino online with BTC,I really like the idea but my friend (the developer) said that is risky because whatever is gambling is not legal,is this true?

So how all the gambling websites here deal with it?

Please let me know I don't really know much about gambling and how it works

Thanks

The legality is one of MANY issues in creating a casino. Unless you have $10,000 or more available to invest in a bitcoin casino, it will be very hard for you to ever make enough money to make it worth your while. You will tend to small bettors who occasionally will hit you for 100x their deposit. If you do not have a large bankroll, and especially if you do not know much about gambling already, I would NOT create a casino. You will get in over your head and regret it imo.
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1002
July 03, 2013, 04:50:38 PM
#6
Also Russia is not a good example as online gambling is heavily illegal over there.
Russia does not recognize virtual currency as money or even tangible asset, therefore running Bitcoin-only casino in Russia is the same as running non-commercial gambling site like pokerth.com (which is legal of course).
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
July 03, 2013, 04:29:56 PM
#5
It depends on country and state laws and also on the type of gambling you are planning to run. Also going offshore doesn't make it legal at all. Also Russia is not a good example as online gambling is heavily illegal over there.
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1002
July 03, 2013, 01:23:32 PM
#4
So you're saying that if I host the website,let's say in Russia there is nothing non legal about it?even if it's a gambling game?
Virtual currencies in Russia are not considered as monetary asset at all (there was a court decision some time ago which denied to enforce WebMoney loan contract).

Unfortunately if you live in the U.S., govt still can attack on you, but as Bitcoin gambling still is in the grey area (not explicitly prohibited), "cease and desist" notification will be made at first IMHO.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
July 03, 2013, 01:21:03 PM
#3
Hi Guys

Yesterday i was talking with a friend of mine about opening a casino online with BTC,I really like the idea but my friend (the developer) said that is risky because whatever is gambling is not legal,is this true?

So how all the gambling websites here deal with it?

Please let me know I don't really know much about gambling and how it works

Thanks

quick answer if in US - NO - therefore move it offshore

So you're saying that is I host the website,let's say in Russia there is nothing non legal about it?even if it's a gambling game?

It depends a lot on how the country views the currency. Technically as nothing has been said either way specifically about Bitcoin gambling by governments we can assume that we are allowed to do it, even though the wiser option would be not to do it until given the green light

Britain once called Bitcoin tokens rather than currency, there is nothing illegal with gambling tokens, as far as I am aware, as they have no monetary value and can only be exchanged for goods and services, rather than buying goods and services.

Of cause that justification is completely false, the entire idea of Bitcoin is not known to be legal or illegal, in any country. The fact that anyone at all is trading them is a huge risk, it takes just one person to outlaw it and the entire system could potentially die.

With that being said I think it's a wise idea to try and make a mark before Bitcoin takes off.

I would say go for it if you have the time and money and a unique idea, Bitcoin has literally no limitations so express your creativity and come up with something great

I would suggest trying to get hosting outside the US though, we all know what they're like with the internet..
sr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 251
Tic.eth
July 03, 2013, 01:06:24 PM
#2
Hi Guys

Yesterday i was talking with a friend of mine about opening a casino online with BTC,I really like the idea but my friend (the developer) said that is risky because whatever is gambling is not legal,is this true?

So how all the gambling websites here deal with it?

Please let me know I don't really know much about gambling and how it works

Thanks

quick answer if in US - NO - therefore move it offshore

So you're saying that if I host the website,let's say in Russia there is nothing non legal about it?even if it's a gambling game?
sr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 251
Tic.eth
July 03, 2013, 12:55:51 PM
#1
Hi Guys

Yesterday i was talking with a friend of mine about opening a casino online with BTC,I really like the idea but my friend (the developer) said that is risky because whatever is gambling is not legal,is this true?

So how all the gambling websites here deal with it?

Please let me know I don't really know much about gambling and how it works

Thanks
Jump to: