Are Physical Coins a good investment?

TookDk

legendary

Activity: 1960

Merit: 1062

One coin to rule them all

Quote from: polynesia on July 22, 2014, 08:26:04 PM

Quote from: TookDk on July 22, 2014, 11:19:00 AM

lolz, you are funny Cheesy

Mike made a 1000 BTC, 1 Oz Solid Gold back in in 2011:
http://casascius.uberbills.com/?address=1Au1uZnK87eUMoJKRL9S3wroM29AiUQtL5

Could be worth a million dollars soon.

Well, as a matter of fact, it was sold for 1 million dollars...

polynesia

legendary

Activity: 1358

Merit: 1000

Quote from: TookDk on July 22, 2014, 11:19:00 AM

lolz, you are funny Cheesy

Mike made a 1000 BTC, 1 Oz Solid Gold back in in 2011:
http://casascius.uberbills.com/?address=1Au1uZnK87eUMoJKRL9S3wroM29AiUQtL5

Could be worth a million dollars soon.

TookDk

legendary

Activity: 1960

Merit: 1062

One coin to rule them all

Quote from: fonenumba on July 22, 2014, 05:11:24 PM

Quote from: miffman on July 22, 2014, 04:45:22 PM

Physical coins are collector's novelties. Personally, I think it's quite fun to have a physical but still usable representation of something virtual. If you're looking more to profit instead of collect, I suggest you start trading BTC/fiat or altcoins

How are they collector's novelties? Anyone can make these physical coins.

You should make a coin and put into production, I promise to buy one if the price is reasonable Wink

fonenumba

full member

Activity: 411

Merit: 100

Quote from: miffman on July 22, 2014, 04:45:22 PM

Physical coins are collector's novelties. Personally, I think it's quite fun to have a physical but still usable representation of something virtual. If you're looking more to profit instead of collect, I suggest you start trading BTC/fiat or altcoins

How are they collector's novelties? Anyone can make these physical coins.

miffman

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1005

PGP ID: 78B7B84D

Physical coins are collector's novelties. Personally, I think it's quite fun to have a physical but still usable representation of something virtual. If you're looking more to profit instead of collect, I suggest you start trading BTC/fiat or altcoins

redwhitenblue

member

Activity: 104

Merit: 10

I would say that physical coins would be a horrible investment as you do not have the ability to send the coins around the world for $0.06 US. If anything the coins would probably trade at a discount to what is on them as you would have an elevated risk of theft.

TookDk

legendary

Activity: 1960

Merit: 1062

One coin to rule them all

Quote from: polynesia on July 22, 2014, 10:46:25 AM

Quote from: Brewins on July 22, 2014, 01:55:15 AM

Its like investing in silver artwork and special edition coins. They are sold by more they face or silver value, and may or may not be worth much more in the future.

I don't know much about this market, but I think the bitcoin market is in some sense more risky, because we have less previous cases for us to analyze, and less risky, because we can count on bitcoin's history of valuation over years.

You even have physical coins made out of gold these days. Roll Eyes

http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericxlmu/2014/07/21/chinese-bitcoiner-made-physical-bitcoin-in-pure-gold/

lolz, you are funny Cheesy

Mike made a 1000 BTC, 1 Oz Solid Gold back in in 2011:
http://casascius.uberbills.com/?address=1Au1uZnK87eUMoJKRL9S3wroM29AiUQtL5

polynesia

legendary

Activity: 1358

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Brewins on July 22, 2014, 01:55:15 AM

Its like investing in silver artwork and special edition coins. They are sold by more they face or silver value, and may or may not be worth much more in the future.

I don't know much about this market, but I think the bitcoin market is in some sense more risky, because we have less previous cases for us to analyze, and less risky, because we can count on bitcoin's history of valuation over years.

You even have physical coins made out of gold these days. Roll Eyes

http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericxlmu/2014/07/21/chinese-bitcoiner-made-physical-bitcoin-in-pure-gold/

Brewins

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1000

Its like investing in silver artwork and special edition coins. They are sold by more they face or silver value, and may or may not be worth much more in the future.

I don't know much about this market, but I think the bitcoin market is in some sense more risky, because we have less previous cases for us to analyze, and less risky, because we can count on bitcoin's history of valuation over years.

polynesia

legendary

Activity: 1358

Merit: 1000

It also depends on how many physical coins are made ('rarity' factor).
If a manufacturer floods the market with physical coins as BTC prices move up, then the premium will not move up proportionately.

TookDk

legendary

Activity: 1960

Merit: 1062

One coin to rule them all

Quote from: Rub3n on July 19, 2014, 08:41:25 PM

I think it's personal preference. However I also think digital will get you the most money. Imagine btc going to 50 usd. A 400 usd 1 btc coin is then a lot less interesting.

The coin would be worth nine time the face value in terms of bitcoin, in your described scenario.

Rub3n

hero member

Activity: 565

Merit: 501

S> Cheap SocialMedia Hype's

Quote from: jcoin200 on July 14, 2014, 10:45:50 AM

Quote from: C10H15N on July 14, 2014, 10:41:38 AM

An intact physical bitcoin should never be worth less than the underlying bitcoin.

Yes again I realize 1BTC will always equal 1BTC. But say you buy a Casascius 1BTC which carries a $400 premium in addition to the 1BTC funded value, would you of been better off to just hold the $400 worth of BTC, rather than put it into the collectors value of the coin? Cause if BTC goes up, then that $400 extra you paid for the coin would be worth less in BTC. Same in $ value per say, but less in BTC. See what I'm getting at?

I think it's personal preference. However I also think digital will get you the most money. Imagine btc going to 50 usd. A 400 usd 1 btc coin is then a lot less interesting.

Mieehayii

hero member

Activity: 490

Merit: 500

One way, you can do day trade, buy low and sell high, but the trend needs to constantly stare

chennan

legendary

Activity: 1316

Merit: 1004

Quote from: jcoin200 on July 14, 2014, 10:38:01 AM

Quote from: C10H15N on July 14, 2014, 10:32:02 AM

A physical coin with an intact hologram will not only have the underlying bitcoin value, but also the collectable value of that physical bitcoin with an intact hologram. Make sense?

Yes I get that, I'm just wondering if they are as good of an investment as straight BTC. Because if BTC were to rise, the "collectors value" would have to rise too to match the rise in BTC value. If it didn't the coin would be worth less in BTC.

There are many physical bitcoind that can be easily made. They are not special and unique that will make sure its value appreciate as the time is going by. It is not worth to pay premium to buy it rather than just holding bitcoin.

giveBTCpls

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

If Bitcoin goes mainstream, physical coins would be a really legit investment because of collectible and rarity value. Like I see it being exposed in a museum in 50 years as something curious to see.

Melbustus

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1004

Quote from: djjacket on July 14, 2014, 11:42:48 AM

... Many of those early coins probably did not get stored properly to maintain the original condition.

Definitely not. I used to carry a couple around unprotected in my pocket and pass 'em around.

djjacket

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 501

Quote from: Melbustus on July 14, 2014, 10:56:08 AM

NOTE: I'm only talking about Casascius coins. Others are far less "iconic", so I don't see much sense in discussion their numismatic appeal (seems a lot less likely to hold long-term, IMO). The story of Casascius coins tracks bitcoin very nicely; from inception as a conversation piece to production-termination due to regulatory aggression... It takes that sort of history to create lasting numismatic value. Fundamentally, "collector value" makes no practical sense; it's our human nature in seeking ties to the past and continuity (and therefore mementos) that drive it.

Very good explanation. Numismatic appeal and demand comes from many factors - condition, appeal, rarity, history. IMO the taking into these factors, the best investment would be High Grade ANACS slabbed Casascius coins. The history of the coins is well documented. The ANACS grading standardizes the condition and preserves the condition. The original 2011 coin in a pristine condition is not an easy find considering the value at the time they were produced. They were developed as a novelty and way to bring attention to bitcoin. Many of those early coins probably did not get stored properly to maintain the original condition.

jcoin200

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

Quote from: Melbustus on July 14, 2014, 10:56:08 AM

Quote from: jcoin200 on July 14, 2014, 10:38:01 AM

Quote from: C10H15N on July 14, 2014, 10:32:02 AM

A physical coin with an intact hologram will not only have the underlying bitcoin value, but also the collectable value of that physical bitcoin with an intact hologram. Make sense?

Yes I get that, I'm just wondering if they are as good of an investment as straight BTC. Because if BTC were to rise, the "collectors value" would have to rise too to match the rise in BTC value. If it didn't the coin would be worth less in BTC.

It's an open question. Some think the numismatic value will effectively remain denominated in btc as bitcoin value rises, others think more so in fiat. To give some "historical" perspective, IIRC, we had tiny btc premiums in 2012, then the boom in btc popularity in spring 2013 boosted premiums significantly (toward 1.5x-2x for a 1BTC Series-2 Casascius coin). The lull over summer/fall 2013 dropped premiums down (1.25x-1.5x), but nowhere near pre-spring2013. Then the run-up in November boosted premiums again (back toward 2x), and now they're down a bit again...

NOTE: I'm only talking about Casascius coins. Others are far less "iconic", so I don't see much sense in discussion their numismatic appeal (seems a lot less likely to hold long-term, IMO). The story of Casascius coins tracks bitcoin very nicely; from inception as a conversation piece to production-termination due to regulatory aggression... It takes that sort of history to create lasting numismatic value. Fundamentally, "collector value" makes no practical sense; it's our human nature in seeking ties to the past and continuity (and therefore mementos) that drive it.

Thank you, this is what I was wondering, if they have a history of keeping their premium in BTC value, not the equiv fiat value. It seems you are right, going with a Casascius will probably be a good bet long term, while the lesser known coins probably not so much. Thanks for the insight!

Melbustus

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1004

Arguments against btc-denominated premiums:
1) People think in fiat.

Arguments for sustained btc-denominated premiums:
1) People will think in btc when dealing with btc assets.
2) Premiums on many gold/silver bullion coins are enormous. There are hundreds of different issue pre-1933 gold and silver coins that trade for *many* multiples of their bullion/melt value.
3) There aren't many Casascius coins in existence. Especially compared to the surviving populations of gold and silver coins that still maintain bullion-premiums of many multiples.

Melbustus

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1004

Quote from: jcoin200 on July 14, 2014, 10:38:01 AM

Quote from: C10H15N on July 14, 2014, 10:32:02 AM

A physical coin with an intact hologram will not only have the underlying bitcoin value, but also the collectable value of that physical bitcoin with an intact hologram. Make sense?

Yes I get that, I'm just wondering if they are as good of an investment as straight BTC. Because if BTC were to rise, the "collectors value" would have to rise too to match the rise in BTC value. If it didn't the coin would be worth less in BTC.

It's an open question. Some think the numismatic value will effectively remain denominated in btc as bitcoin value rises, others think more so in fiat. To give some "historical" perspective, IIRC, we had tiny btc premiums in 2012, then the boom in btc popularity in spring 2013 boosted premiums significantly (toward 1.5x-2x for a 1BTC Series-2 Casascius coin). The lull over summer/fall 2013 dropped premiums down (1.25x-1.5x), but nowhere near pre-spring2013. Then the run-up in November boosted premiums again (back toward 2x), and now they're down a bit again...

NOTE: I'm only talking about Casascius coins. Others are far less "iconic", so I don't see much sense in discussion their numismatic appeal (seems a lot less likely to hold long-term, IMO). The story of Casascius coins tracks bitcoin very nicely; from inception as a conversation piece to production-termination due to regulatory aggression... It takes that sort of history to create lasting numismatic value. Fundamentally, "collector value" makes no practical sense; it's our human nature in seeking ties to the past and continuity (and therefore mementos) that drive it.

jcoin200

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

Quote from: C10H15N on July 14, 2014, 10:41:38 AM

An intact physical bitcoin should never be worth less than the underlying bitcoin.

Yes again I realize 1BTC will always equal 1BTC. But say you buy a Casascius 1BTC which carries a $400 premium in addition to the 1BTC funded value, would you of been better off to just hold the $400 worth of BTC, rather than put it into the collectors value of the coin? Cause if BTC goes up, then that $400 extra you paid for the coin would be worth less in BTC. Same in $ value per say, but less in BTC. See what I'm getting at?

C10H15N

legendary

Activity: 944

Merit: 1026

An intact physical bitcoin should never be worth less than the underlying bitcoin.

jcoin200

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

Quote from: C10H15N on July 14, 2014, 10:32:02 AM

A physical coin with an intact hologram will not only have the underlying bitcoin value, but also the collectable value of that physical bitcoin with an intact hologram. Make sense?

Yes I get that, I'm just wondering if they are as good of an investment as straight BTC. Because if BTC were to rise, the "collectors value" would have to rise too to match the rise in BTC value. If it didn't the coin would be worth less in BTC.

C10H15N

legendary

Activity: 944

Merit: 1026

A physical coin with an intact hologram will not only have the underlying bitcoin value, but also the collectable value of that physical bitcoin with an intact hologram. Make sense?

jcoin200

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

I've been looking at investing in physical BTC coins for a little while now, but I wondered if they are the best bet. Heres what I was thinking:

For example : You buy a 1BTC physical coin for 1BTC (the funded value) + a premium, say $300. So right now you'd pay about 1.48BTC.

Then if BTC value goes up to say $750, the coin would only be worth 1.4BTC, and less if BTC goes higher.

So my question is, is it better to just hold BTC rather than physical coins? Assuming the coin gains some collectors value, it would have to gain a lot in my opinion to keep with with any rise in BTC. Any thoughts?

Topic: Are Physical Coins a good investment? (Read 1990 times)