Topic: Are the Dash developers getting desperate? (Read 889 times)

[...] Then the dog mascot thing, wtf is going on here?  Even calling it something like "Duffnotes" would have been better.

Hahaha. Where did you find that Rube Goldberg "carry the flag for our instascrew ball team" portrait of Evan Duckfeld. The facial expression is a perfect match, "Who me? I didn't do it. I'm just your puppy eyes friendly duck with a transmorgrifried beakground in finance".

I'm no expert, but it seems like there's a lot of bad vibes coming from the Dash developers recently.

Please stop.

You're making yourselves look massively stupid and it does nothing to support your coin.

Concentrate on Dash's weaknesses before you go around criticizing other projects.

Rant over.

Whether you like or dislike Dash for whatever reason, they've been making some strange decisions.  For one thing, I refuse to even call it "Dash" because it sounds ridiculous and still call it Darkcoin instead.  Then the dog mascot thing, wtf is going on here?  Even calling it something like "Duffnotes" would have been better.

I say that I've yet to meet a Dash owner who is not a brain-dead twat.

I'm no expert, but it seems like there's a lot of bad vibes coming from the Dash developers recently.

Please stop.

You're making yourselves look massively stupid and it does nothing to support your coin.

Concentrate on Dash's weaknesses before you go around criticizing other projects.

Rant over.

I'm no expert, but it seems like there's a lot of bad vibes coming from the Dash developers recently.

Please stop.

You're making yourselves look massively stupid and it does nothing to support your coin.

Concentrate on Dash's weaknesses before you go around criticizing other projects.

Rant over.

Ah fuck, a Dash owner. Should have known.

It's weird. I remember when Darkcoin was labelling Litecoin 'the most toxic community in the cryptospace'. And I remember thinking, why? What has Litecoin ever done to deserve that title? Charlie Lee is a good guy, LTC was fairly launched with no instamine, it changed the algorythm for the better, had a grassroots orientated ethic where everyone had to contribute to make it work, set against the backdrop of a genuinely hostile BTC crowd - what did Litecoin ever do to deserve that mantra from Darkcoin?

Why is it always seemingly the good projects, I wondered, that get attacked so.

And here we are again, Darkcoin aka Dash once again labelling the taxon 'toxic community' to another fairly launched project, also with a credible collective of good-intentioned developers, honest tech that works and is endorsed and contributed to by some of the most respectable people in the industry.

What is it I wonder about Dash that makes it so antagonistic of fairly launched grassroots projects?

Is it perhaps a kind of psychological denial that's projected outward in view of the hideous 50% instamine that props the entire enterprise up? Perhaps it's the embarrassing cult-like dictat that surrounds thy great leader, Evan Duffield, who is able to afford 'great achievements' for his pot-smoking subordinates.

Dash is quite possibly one of the worst projects I've ever encountered, and I'm not joking when I say that I've yet to meet a Dash owner who is not a brain-dead twat.

If that's toxic, then I apologise on your behalf. Because if calling out a project for being absolute bullshit (and yes, that does indeed include snake-oil) makes me a cunt, then let it be so.

Because I would much much rather be labelled toxic for speaking the truth, than suffer the taxon of being a part of the most ignorant, passive, suck-cocky, college-doofused plastic-politicked twatstain of a retard community that is Dash, that seemingly doesn't have the brains to understand cryptography, nor the balls to stand-up for what is right.