Author

Topic: Are Trump's economic policies good or bad? (Read 72 times)

hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 554
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
The title is a bit misleading. Everything has two sides, and after analyzing it broadly, it's clear that, true to his nature as a businessman, his economic policies tend to benefit the wealthy.
1.Tax Policy:
He proposed tax cuts amounting to trillions of dollars, including expanding the 2017 tax cuts and reducing the corporate tax rate from 21% to 15%.
2.Trade Policy:
He planned to impose new tariffs of 10%-20% on most foreign goods, with higher tariffs on Chinese products (at one point, up to 60%), and heavy tariffs on Mexican automobile products (even threatening to reach 200%).
3.Monetary Policy:
The Federal Reserve should lower interest rates to stimulate economic growth.
These policies cannot be implemented at thesame time because they will conflict with each other. Cutting tax and reduction is tax will lead to inflation. When taxes are cut people will have more money to spend which will lead increase in the price of goods and services. Reduction of interest rates will also put more money in the hands of citizens because people can access loans or credit with low interest.

These economic policies are applied based on certain conditions, it cannot be a long term policy. The FEDs have increased or kept interest rates steady for a long time. But it has been reducing for the last two months because of a decline in inflation and a reduction in job opportunities. Economists have predicted that if Trump implements these policies (together with his mass deportation) at once it will lead to high inflation.
sr. member
Activity: 700
Merit: 270
The title is a bit misleading. Everything has two sides, and after analyzing it broadly, it's clear that, true to his nature as a businessman, his economic policies tend to benefit the wealthy.
1.Tax Policy:
He proposed tax cuts amounting to trillions of dollars, including expanding the 2017 tax cuts and reducing the corporate tax rate from 21% to 15%.
2.Trade Policy:
He planned to impose new tariffs of 10%-20% on most foreign goods, with higher tariffs on Chinese products (at one point, up to 60%), and heavy tariffs on Mexican automobile products (even threatening to reach 200%).
3.Monetary Policy:
The Federal Reserve should lower interest rates to stimulate economic growth.
Looking at this policies from the first to the last, first it gives a breath of fresh air for business owners who spend a fortune in running their business based operational cost, so a cut on tax too will certainly give them a relief which is good because it helps creates a business friendly environment for investors.

Increasing the revenue of state by taxing food importation which is a good way to build revenue because hence you have a lot of foreigners in your country that are always importing their local food to your country, there should be a percentage of tax from that importation accruing to the government coffers.
 However looking at the other policies you've outlined, I would say we should wait and see the effectiveness of this policies at least within a year or 6 months before we could give or pass judgment whether the policies are effective or ineffective.
member
Activity: 672
Merit: 16
Looking for guilt best look first into a mirror
as always some will win, some will loose.
Last century the losers where a lot quieter. 
legendary
Activity: 3304
Merit: 1617
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
It might depend where your political beliefs lie, as you may have some bias for or against anything Trump does or doesn’t do. Overall I think his policies are good, he’s a very successful businessman too so his decisions are likeoy to be better for growth & the economy than Harris’s would have been who was basically a public servant in her career.
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 2594
Top Crypto Casino
The title is a bit misleading. Everything has two sides, and after analyzing it broadly, it's clear that, true to his nature as a businessman, his economic policies tend to benefit the wealthy.

Well, his economic policies remain to be seen, as he is still just a president-elect who has yet to take office.

Regarding his campaign promises, I doubt he got elected just because of votes from "wealthy" - it was probably more regular middle class people unhappy with how things are who wanted something different.  Sure, some of his ideas might help the economy overall.  But a lot of times those kinds of plans tend to benefit the rich more than regular people. We've seen this play out before, so it's hard to imagine things will look drastically different this time, even if he does try to put a spin on it for the middle class. It's all about who gets the bigger slice of the pie.
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1500
The title is a bit misleading. Everything has two sides, and after analyzing it broadly, it's clear that, true to his nature as a businessman, his economic policies tend to benefit the wealthy.
1.Tax Policy:
He proposed tax cuts amounting to trillions of dollars, including expanding the 2017 tax cuts and reducing the corporate tax rate from 21% to 15%.
2.Trade Policy:
He planned to impose new tariffs of 10%-20% on most foreign goods, with higher tariffs on Chinese products (at one point, up to 60%), and heavy tariffs on Mexican automobile products (even threatening to reach 200%).
3.Monetary Policy:
The Federal Reserve should lower interest rates to stimulate economic growth.

Well, these are his election promises! None of these have become a law yet. However, if these come into effect, both businesses and individuals are going to be positively affected.

Reduction of tax percentage and lowering of interest rate, are going to impact positively for majority of the society. So I believe, these are people pleasing decisions. economy impact is probably going to be negative because the banks are going to suffer.

Please wait until get gets to start his presidency in Jan. A lot to see to be honest!
sr. member
Activity: 1400
Merit: 268
Fully Regulated Crypto Casino
While it's true that tax cuts and tariffs can look like they're handouts to the wealthy, their macro impact is a little more complex. Lower corporate tax rates, for example, are usually part of a policy package aimed at increasing local investments and jobs, but still engender considerable debate on wealth distribution. Similarly, while high tariffs can raise consumer costs, they're also intended to preserve US industries and equalize competition with global competitors, a bipartisan trade approach mirrored in recent US trade strategies.

Monetary policy, to take the possible Federal Reserve rate cuts in 2024 as an example, is a reflection of economic conditions, not political will. This reduction of interest may boost the economy, a factor that should be helping the rich and other fields. These examples are representative of the fact that many policies, while raising concerns about equity, are really about their broader economic intended ripple.
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1160
Playbet.io - Crypto Casino and Sportsbook
If those proposals become law, I think they’ll benefit America. After all, that’s why people voted for him, he aims to ensure Americans enjoy the benefits meant for them. These laws seem to push the idea that America is for its people. Whether it’s ultimately good or not, we’ll have to wait and see the results before making any conclusions.
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 10611
1.Tax Policy:
He proposed tax cuts amounting to trillions of dollars, including expanding the 2017 tax cuts and reducing the corporate tax rate from 21% to 15%.
2.Trade Policy:
He planned to impose new tariffs of 10%-20% on most foreign goods, with higher tariffs on Chinese products (at one point, up to 60%), and heavy tariffs on Mexican automobile products (even threatening to reach 200%).
3.Monetary Policy:
The Federal Reserve should lower interest rates to stimulate economic growth.
1 and 2 are in contradiction with 3 because they have the potential of causing inflation and FED can not lower interest rates if the inflation goes up high.

1) Cutting taxes will reduce government income. A government that has an increasing expense and is facing a bigger budget deficit every year. If they cut their revenue, they'll face an even bigger deficit. We all know the only thing governments know to do during deficits is to print more money therefore causing inflation.

2) Like his last term (https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/federal/trump-tariffs-biden-tariffs/), intensifying the tariff war will only cause higher inflation in the US.

3) With 1 & 2 causing higher inflation, the FED can not lower interest rates. In fact they may increase it to an even higher value which means an even worse recession in the US.

So are these policies are good or bad? We have to wait and see what he actually does and how they'll affect the US economy (6 to 12 months before we can give a better analysis); but for now they don't look good on paper.
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1402
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
I'm relying somewhat on this article but adding my own thoughts.
High taxes on imported goods will likely help local manufacturers and businesses, but as reliance on China is very high, I think some industries will be severely hurt because of the lack of domestic supply. His tax cuts will benefit the wealthiest the most, but can also be somewhat beneficial for small businesses. His migration policies will likely lead to negative economic impact, even though politically, they will be satisfying for a large part of the population.
Overall, I think his approaches are risky, likely very good for very powerful people but pretty bad for the economy overall.
legendary
Activity: 2242
Merit: 3523
Flippin' burgers since 1163.
During his first term Trump often referred to the stock market as an indicator how well he was doing. And his image as a deal maker and business man is important to him. No different his second term. And when printer goes brrrr stock market goes up (and btc!).
hero member
Activity: 1666
Merit: 709
Playbet.io - Crypto Casino and Sportsbook
The title is a bit misleading. Everything has two sides, and after analyzing it broadly, it's clear that, true to his nature as a businessman, his economic policies tend to benefit the wealthy.
1.Tax Policy:
He proposed tax cuts amounting to trillions of dollars, including expanding the 2017 tax cuts and reducing the corporate tax rate from 21% to 15%.
2.Trade Policy:
He planned to impose new tariffs of 10%-20% on most foreign goods, with higher tariffs on Chinese products (at one point, up to 60%), and heavy tariffs on Mexican automobile products (even threatening to reach 200%).
3.Monetary Policy:
The Federal Reserve should lower interest rates to stimulate economic growth.

Let the man assume office before all this speculations and I think it's fair to access if a policy works or not after at least first hundred days in office.
Policies are still subjected to changes he can have some interactions with is trusted team and may be make some adjustments for now all this are propositions.

Also going by what you just wrote I would really like to understand how it benefits the wealthy. In addition Donald might be a billionaire but you hardly find any president of the United States of America who is a poor man or doesn't have wealthy friends, let's be honest. So thinking that Trump's policy would benefit the wealthy because he is one is unfair.
Correct me if I am wrong TAX CUT is something that would benefit everyone both the upper class and the lower class?
jr. member
Activity: 45
Merit: 1
The title is a bit misleading. Everything has two sides, and after analyzing it broadly, it's clear that, true to his nature as a businessman, his economic policies tend to benefit the wealthy.
1.Tax Policy:
He proposed tax cuts amounting to trillions of dollars, including expanding the 2017 tax cuts and reducing the corporate tax rate from 21% to 15%.
2.Trade Policy:
He planned to impose new tariffs of 10%-20% on most foreign goods, with higher tariffs on Chinese products (at one point, up to 60%), and heavy tariffs on Mexican automobile products (even threatening to reach 200%).
3.Monetary Policy:
The Federal Reserve should lower interest rates to stimulate economic growth.
Jump to: