You could argue that the Corona Virus is a novel one because it is man made, and because it incorporates a RNA string which was added by gain-of-function technology to make it more infectious to humans.
It seems to be pretty much accepted that the virus was created using American funded gain-of-function technology.
mRNA vaccines are not new, they have been under development for over 20 years, and they failed to protect against SARS or MERS. No information has beenb released as to why they failed, or what their side effects were. It is an interesting coincidence that they have arrived just in time to save us from this man made virus.
wrong for many reasons but lets pick the top 2.
1. man made
- hundreds of thousands of studies have seen the virus sequence. they know it so well and compared it that they can also see the natural wild changes as it mutates in public. they can see the variances of symptomology to know which strains are of significance..
but most importantly. they can look at the alpha sequence and see that it still has palindromes and introns
(2 things that disapear when editing in a lab)
it also lacks indels(sequences added when editing in a lab)
thus no editing had occured..
2, gain of function
-the much publicised NIH-WUHAN research. was not gain of function.. it was infact decrease of function. without using any gene editing..
taking older viruses like the older sars. and actually attenuating them down.
in short they turned down the lab temperature and let it incubate at near freezing. thus slowing down the replication rate. and while the virus learned to survive at lower temperatures.. meant it didnt like higher temperatures like body heat
and so would not replicate in body heat scenarios..
this is not gain of function. this was loss of function study.
no gene editing. no covid sequence. no splicing
the sequence used in the NIH-WUHAN study was not even the same lineage as what covid was.
there is no lineage associated virus in wuhan that can explain covid existance
but here is the thing. though loss of function virus is a good candidate for a vaccine.. guess what. loss of function then becomes a poor candidate as a mass produced vaccine for the world.
3. mRNA lack of research
there is massive amount of studies. the lack is in jetcash.. HIM lacking to research the research.
mRNA breaks down in a couple of days.
mRNA creates protiens. lacks the length of code to do the more complex taska of gene editing/replicating
the protein it creates appears on the cell that created it(its not blasted into the bloodstream)
the protein breaks down in a few weeks if not handled already by your immune system earlier
