Author

Topic: As a 17 year-old libertarian: (Read 1497 times)

newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
November 27, 2011, 08:45:21 PM
#14
The only president that has successfully balanced the budget was Andrew Jackson. Of course that was torn apart very soon.
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
November 27, 2011, 07:54:48 PM
#13
Actually it's the republicans and the rise of right wing conservatism that did that. Reagan did nothing but spend money that the country didn't have and it basically set the prescedent for every other president (except clinton, who understood that you need to actually have money before you can spend it) to do exactly the same thing.

Thats right. FDR and Wilson (among others) didn't spend money. They spent magic fairy dust!

They balanced their budgets over the economic cycle.  Reagan and Bush were both unusual in that they borrowed when times were good.
member
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
November 26, 2011, 10:54:24 AM
#12
Actually it's the republicans and the rise of right wing conservatism that did that. Reagan did nothing but spend money that the country didn't have and it basically set the prescedent for every other president (except clinton, who understood that you need to actually have money before you can spend it) to do exactly the same thing.

Thats right. FDR and Wilson (among others) didn't spend money. They spent magic fairy dust!
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
bitcoin hundred-aire
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1016
Strength in numbers
November 25, 2011, 03:08:25 PM
#10
Actually it's the republicans and the rise of right wing conservatism that did that. Reagan did nothing but spend money that the country didn't have and it basically set the prescedent for every other president (except clinton, who understood that you need to actually have money before you can spend it) to do exactly the same thing.
Try FDR and Theodore. The New Deal era was a precursor to the further damage.

Not strictly true.  The New Deal worked until 1937 when FDR lost his nerve and cut public spending throwing American back into recession.  The UK was embarking on re-armament at the time and was saved by that extra boost of cash.

What made him lose his nerve, what did he think would happen if he continued?
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
November 24, 2011, 05:04:34 PM
#9
Actually it's the republicans and the rise of right wing conservatism that did that. Reagan did nothing but spend money that the country didn't have and it basically set the prescedent for every other president (except clinton, who understood that you need to actually have money before you can spend it) to do exactly the same thing.
Try FDR and Theodore. The New Deal era was a precursor to the further damage.

Not strictly true.  The New Deal worked until 1937 when FDR lost his nerve and cut public spending throwing American back into recession.  The UK was embarking on re-armament at the time and was saved by that extra boost of cash.
sr. member
Activity: 314
Merit: 251
November 24, 2011, 04:56:19 PM
#8
Can someone get me a list of countries without debt?
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
November 24, 2011, 03:54:53 PM
#7
Actually it's the republicans and the rise of right wing conservatism that did that. Reagan did nothing but spend money that the country didn't have and it basically set the prescedent for every other president (except clinton, who understood that you need to actually have money before you can spend it) to do exactly the same thing.
Try FDR and Theodore. The New Deal era was a precursor to the further damage.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
November 24, 2011, 01:56:36 PM
#5
Actually it's the republicans and the rise of right wing conservatism that did that. Reagan did nothing but spend money that the country didn't have and it basically set the prescedent for every other president (except clinton, who understood that you need to actually have money before you can spend it) to do exactly the same thing.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
November 24, 2011, 03:47:45 AM
#4
Hey Atlas, I thought you didn't believe in segregating people into meaningless groups like race or what year they were born.

Culture can unfortunately be an objective exception; however, just as there are species and breeds its representatives can be quite diverse.
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 252
SmartFi - EARN, LEND & TRADE
November 24, 2011, 03:24:52 AM
#3
Hey Atlas, I thought you didn't believe in segregating people into meaningless groups like race or what year they were born.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 251
FirstBits: 168Bc
November 24, 2011, 03:16:59 AM
#2
I might send that to my parents. Thanks Atlas.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
Jump to: