ASIC BLADE Problem | Bitcointalksearch.org

defcon23

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1002

Quote from: hardhatmac on November 04, 2013, 11:10:32 PM

Hello
What im doing wrong here . Why is the efficiency so low ?

Thanks
Hardhatmac

Total MHS:   00816
Received:   0000006216
Accepted:   0000000471
Per Minute:   011.13
Efficiency:   007.57%
Up Time:   0d,00h,42m,17s

Current Server: gbt.mining.eligius.st:9337
Chip: OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
IP   192.168.100.200
Mask   255.255.255.0
Gateway   192.168.100.1
WEB Port   8000
Primary DNS 192.168.100.1
Secondary DNS   211.148.192.141
Ports   9337,9337
Server addresses   gbt.mining.eligius.st,gbt.mining.eligius.st
user:pass

hello, i can offer remote assistance to help you to config your blades; PM me if it's still a problem ..

HellDiverUK

hero member

Activity: 1246

Merit: 501

Quote from: CrazyGuy on November 05, 2013, 07:07:17 PM

Blades are inefficient and restart very frequently when mining against a remote getwork server.

Can't say I've seen that myself.

Quote

Pointing to the eligius getwork server is a useless exercise, but if you are into wasting time I suppose that's your choice...

It's not. As I said, getting the guy pointing to the correct server is only the first step of getting him mining efficiently.

What he's trying to do is drive a car on a lake. My suggestion is getting him off water and on to dry land. THEN we worry about getting him on the road and going quickly.

Quote

Did you coin the term "armchair miner"?

Seems I did. Tongue

CrazyGuy

legendary

Activity: 1973

Merit: 1007

Quote from: HellDiverUK on November 05, 2013, 11:55:59 AM

Quote from: pontiacg5 on November 05, 2013, 11:52:49 AM

Quote from: HellDiverUK on November 05, 2013, 11:51:21 AM

Quote from: hardhatmac on November 04, 2013, 11:10:32 PM

Hello
What im doing wrong here . Why is the efficiency so low ?

Current Server: gbt.mining.eligius.st:9337

GBT is wrong. You want Getwork. There's a big difference.

The Blades only support getwork.

You want getwork.mining.eligius.st:8337

No, you want a stratum proxy. I'm surprised anyone is even running an outdated getwork pool any more, and I doubt it will even be around much longer.

Armchair miners... lol

Well, lets get him working on the correct server to start off with. GBT is totally wrong. THEN we get him running on a stratum proxy.

I've got my Blades pointed to a local proxy as the primary server, and backup is set to the getwork server on Eligius - that means when/if the machine running the proxy is rebooting/crashed, the Blades can mine on their own as long as the internet is still working.

Blades are inefficient and restart very frequently when mining against a remote getwork server. Pointing to the eligius getwork server is a useless exercise, but if you are into wasting time I suppose that's your choice...

Did you coin the term "armchair miner"?

HellDiverUK

hero member

Activity: 1246

Merit: 501

Quote from: pontiacg5 on November 05, 2013, 11:52:49 AM

Quote from: HellDiverUK on November 05, 2013, 11:51:21 AM

Quote from: hardhatmac on November 04, 2013, 11:10:32 PM

Hello
What im doing wrong here . Why is the efficiency so low ?

Current Server: gbt.mining.eligius.st:9337

GBT is wrong. You want Getwork. There's a big difference.

The Blades only support getwork.

You want getwork.mining.eligius.st:8337

No, you want a stratum proxy. I'm surprised anyone is even running an outdated getwork pool any more, and I doubt it will even be around much longer.

Armchair miners... lol

Well, lets get him working on the correct server to start off with. GBT is totally wrong. THEN we get him running on a stratum proxy.

I've got my Blades pointed to a local proxy as the primary server, and backup is set to the getwork server on Eligius - that means when/if the machine running the proxy is rebooting/crashed, the Blades can mine on their own as long as the internet is still working.

pontiacg5

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Quote from: HellDiverUK on November 05, 2013, 11:51:21 AM

Quote from: hardhatmac on November 04, 2013, 11:10:32 PM

Hello
What im doing wrong here . Why is the efficiency so low ?

Current Server: gbt.mining.eligius.st:9337

GBT is wrong. You want Getwork. There's a big difference.

The Blades only support getwork.

You want getwork.mining.eligius.st:8337

No, you want a stratum proxy. I'm surprised anyone is even running an outdated getwork pool any more, and I doubt it will even be around much longer.

Armchair miners... lol

HellDiverUK

hero member

Activity: 1246

Merit: 501

Quote from: hardhatmac on November 04, 2013, 11:10:32 PM

Hello
What im doing wrong here . Why is the efficiency so low ?

Current Server: gbt.mining.eligius.st:9337

GBT is wrong. You want Getwork. There's a big difference.

The Blades only support getwork.

You want getwork.mining.eligius.st:8337

Edit: got to love the armchair miners, replying when they haven't got a clue. Roll Eyes

sidehack

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1858

Curmudgeonly hardware guy

Running hot could also contribute to reduced efficiency. Some of the newer blades don't have very good heatsink contact with the board.

poochone

sr. member

Activity: 361

Merit: 250

http://mining.bitcoin.cz/mining-proxy-howto

hardhatmac

newbie

Activity: 17

Merit: 0

Hello
How do i setup a local stratum proxy?

Thanks
Hardhatmac

CrazyGuy

legendary

Activity: 1973

Merit: 1007

Setup a local stratum proxy.

hardhatmac

newbie

Activity: 17

Merit: 0

Hello
What im doing wrong here . Why is the efficiency so low ?

Thanks
Hardhatmac

Total MHS:   00816
Received:   0000006216
Accepted:   0000000471
Per Minute:   011.13
Efficiency:   007.57%
Up Time:   0d,00h,42m,17s

Current Server: gbt.mining.eligius.st:9337
Chip: OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
IP   192.168.100.200
Mask   255.255.255.0
Gateway   192.168.100.1
WEB Port   8000
Primary DNS 192.168.100.1
Secondary DNS   211.148.192.141
Ports   9337,9337
Server addresses   gbt.mining.eligius.st,gbt.mining.eligius.st
user:pass

Topic: ASIC BLADE Problem (Read 1200 times)