Author

Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It - page 283. (Read 3917468 times)

hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
Invest & Earn: https://cloudthink.io
I agree it does look like two R3's held together with duct tape some metal.

http://www.bitell.com/index.php/archives/2004/
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 7912
Just announced:

https://twitter.com/RockMinerInc/status/486895634503311362

Anyone have the specifications?

 That is just 2 R3s wrapped in metal.
 Multiply the R3 specs by 2 to get the specs.

legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
Just announced:

https://twitter.com/RockMinerInc/status/486895634503311362

Anyone have the specifications?

Waiting on a reply, havent seen anything yet.

That is their 4th miner in 2 months... Good for them and good for AM
hero member
Activity: 583
Merit: 500
Bitcoin for all & all for Bitcoin
Just announced:

https://twitter.com/RockMinerInc/status/486895634503311362

Anyone have the specifications?

Waiting on a reply, havent seen anything yet.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1119
Exactly...not like I am some newbie with no trust and would post random crap for no reason.  I was hesitant at first to post it, but if it were a secret I am sure FC would have said "hey keep this between us".
I do sorta understand how people here get worked up with all the scammers and such, but it would not make any sense to make up some formula like that...figured it was relevant in this thread...
hero member
Activity: 526
Merit: 500
Was via messages...not a post.

Either post a screenshot then or stop talking nonsense. A screenshot is hardly evidence due to being easy to fake but it's better than nothing. This is now the third time you've been asked to back up your claims with proof. If you fail to do so, it should be evident to everyone here that you are nothing but a liar.



What he said was true, but the world doesn't owe you evidence buddy.  Either believe it or not, but please don't be one of the many paranoid jack asses calling everyone a liar on here.     You were wrong about your suppositions here, how often are you wrong like this when you presume - and what will you do the next time around?  (hint: stfu)
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
Was via messages...not a post.

Either post a screenshot then or stop talking nonsense. A screenshot is hardly evidence due to being easy to fake but it's better than nothing. This is now the third time you've been asked to back up your claims with proof. If you fail to do so, it should be evident to everyone here that you are nothing but a liar.



Here hope this shuts you up now...why would I make up some formula like that..



Best part of the whole thing.  That formula was rather interesting to say the least.  Wonder how AM came up with that.
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1119
Was via messages...not a post.

Either post a screenshot then or stop talking nonsense. A screenshot is hardly evidence due to being easy to fake but it's better than nothing. This is now the third time you've been asked to back up your claims with proof. If you fail to do so, it should be evident to everyone here that you are nothing but a liar.



Here hope this shuts you up now...why would I make up some formula like that..

full member
Activity: 215
Merit: 100
Is his info so hard to believe? Either believe him, or don't. Geez, you act like he owes you something.
legendary
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
There has to be a reason for no dividend even after the massive sales. Among 'investing on future plans', 'manipulating market', and other reasons, 'No profit' seems to be the much better one. The best one, and the only positive one is that 'there's no enough accountants in friedcat's company'. 

The only reason for no profit would be if AM had spent it on more wafers and materials.
legendary
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
Was via messages...not a post.

Either post a screenshot then or stop talking nonsense. A screenshot is hardly evidence due to being easy to fake but it's better than nothing. This is now the third time you've been asked to back up your claims with proof. If you fail to do so, it should be evident to everyone here that you are nothing but a liar.

sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 266
Its been 10days from submitting questions. No single answer at all? It really gets better and better every Q.  Roll Eyes
What's FC's average response time?


FC is waiting for the future to happen so he can report on it
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1001
Touchdown
Its been 10days from submitting questions. No single answer at all? It really gets better and better every Q.  Roll Eyes
What's FC's average response time?
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Its been 10days from submitting questions. No single answer at all? It really gets better and better every Q.  Roll Eyes
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
There has to be a reason for no dividend even after the massive sales. Among 'investing on future plans', 'manipulating market', and other reasons, 'No profit' seems to be the much better one. The best one, and the only positive one is that 'there's no enough accountants in friedcat's company'. 

Occam's Razor.
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
There has to be a reason for no dividend even after the massive sales. Among 'investing on future plans', 'manipulating market', and other reasons, 'No profit' seems to be the much better one. The best one, and the only positive one is that 'there's no enough accountants in friedcat's company'. 
newbie
Activity: 126
Merit: 0
Havelock Jule 8 - Volume: o  Grin
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 7912
We provide: whole mining device excluding PSU.
You provide: PSU, location, operation.

On each difficulty change, you pay us:

(x - 4.59*10^(-5)*t/y)*80% in which
x = 100% PPS of 850G
y = Bitcoin exchange rate on bitstamp
t = seconds in the last round
This is per device.
4.59*10^(-5) is electricity cost per second assuming power is 0.15$/kwh and each device draws 1.1kw.

If (x - 4.59*10^(-5)*t/y)*80% is already equal to or less than zero, or after three months and you decide that the project should discontinue, you can either sell them at market price (which is agreed by us) and pay us 80% of the sold value, or ship them back to us.

After that we give the deposit back to you.


from where is that?

That was per friedcat.

Unless you provide a link to the post where Friedcat said that, it may as well have came straight out of a bull's arse.

Use the bloody quote feature!  Roll Eyes

Was via messages...not a post.

 Did he say how much collateral do you have to put up for an 850GH/s miner? 
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1119
We provide: whole mining device excluding PSU.
You provide: PSU, location, operation.

On each difficulty change, you pay us:

(x - 4.59*10^(-5)*t/y)*80% in which
x = 100% PPS of 850G
y = Bitcoin exchange rate on bitstamp
t = seconds in the last round
This is per device.
4.59*10^(-5) is electricity cost per second assuming power is 0.15$/kwh and each device draws 1.1kw.

If (x - 4.59*10^(-5)*t/y)*80% is already equal to or less than zero, or after three months and you decide that the project should discontinue, you can either sell them at market price (which is agreed by us) and pay us 80% of the sold value, or ship them back to us.

After that we give the deposit back to you.


from where is that?

That was per friedcat.

Unless you provide a link to the post where Friedcat said that, it may as well have came straight out of a bull's arse.

Use the bloody quote feature!  Roll Eyes

Was via messages...not a post.
Jump to: