ASICs being tested now? | Bitcointalksearch.org

bitboyben

sr. member

Activity: 330

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: bitboyben on November 19, 2012, 11:35:02 AM

This isn't GPU miners in high power cost areas unplugging?

At the same time the price picked up? I have to guess no.

Logically they shouldn't. But block halving, lite coin mining and maybe trying to sell GPUs before everyone else does. Couple reasons it could drop.

bitboyben

sr. member

Activity: 330

Merit: 250

This isn't GPU miners in high power cost areas unplugging?

yaffare

newbie

Activity: 45

Merit: 0

Anyone noticed the chart on bitcoinwatch? From the 18th to 19th the hashrate dropped from 30TH to 20TH. What about that? Is the chart correct?

Fcx35x10

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: thebaron on November 18, 2012, 08:36:32 PM

I would assume by now that there is at least one kind of ASIC being used to mine Bitcoins besides BFL's.

A smart businessman would have his own designed and produce and never tell anyone but his investors and Asian contractors.

good point. why wouldn't they want to jump in while the water is still hot

thebaron

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

I would assume by now that there is at least one kind of ASIC being used to mine Bitcoins besides BFL's.

A smart businessman would have his own designed and produce and never tell anyone but his investors and Asian contractors.

Shadow383

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

Quote from: Frizz23 on November 18, 2012, 06:20:02 AM

Quote from: organofcorti on November 18, 2012, 12:15:02 AM

Good point. If ASICs are being burnt in they should have used their own testnet to do it.

According to BFL, Inaba, BFL_Josh, etc. that's what they do / intend to do. At least that's what they say.

Would be nice to get a comment from BFL on organofcortis posting though ...

Have we really not learned our lessons with BFL? Cheesy

MrTeal

legendary

Activity: 1274

Merit: 1004

Quote from: Frizz23 on November 18, 2012, 06:20:02 AM

Quote from: organofcorti on November 18, 2012, 12:15:02 AM

Good point. If ASICs are being burnt in they should have used their own testnet to do it.

According to BFL, Inaba, BFL_Josh, etc. that's what they do / intend to do. At least that's what they say.

Would be nice to get a comment from BFL on organofcortis posting though ...

ASICMINER is planning on selfmining and they should be getting going soon. It could be them as well if it is a single large miner.

organofcorti

donator

Activity: 2058

Merit: 1007

Poor impulse control.

I'm not saying it's a known manufacturer. Just that a large (~1.5 Thps) solominer has stopped mining. I'm not even sure when it started. It could be a huge botnet, for all I know. But the timing - just before ASICs are due - is a bit suspicious.

Frizz23

hero member

Activity: 1162

Merit: 500

Quote from: organofcorti on November 18, 2012, 12:15:02 AM

Good point. If ASICs are being burnt in they should have used their own testnet to do it.

According to BFL, Inaba, BFL_Josh, etc. that's what they do / intend to do. At least that's what they say.

Would be nice to get a comment from BFL on organofcortis posting though ...

organofcorti

donator

Activity: 2058

Merit: 1007

Poor impulse control.

Quote from: niko on November 18, 2012, 12:05:19 AM

An important distinction: if it's on mainnet, it's not "testing" - it's "mining". There's testnet-in-a-box available for testing.

Good point. If ASICs are being burnt in they should have used their own testnet to do it.

niko

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 501

There is more to Bitcoin than bitcoins.

An important distinction: if it's on mainnet, it's not "testing" - it's "mining". There's testnet-in-a-box available for testing.

organofcorti

donator

Activity: 2058

Merit: 1007

Poor impulse control.

Quote from: MrTeal on November 17, 2012, 11:35:13 PM

Quote from: organofcorti on November 17, 2012, 11:29:58 PM

Quote from: MrTeal on November 17, 2012, 11:27:33 PM

Very interesting. Do you think you could use the width tag to resize the images to fit better on the forum?

Never used it before. Can you save me some google time and give me a quick example?

Sure, it's just [ img width=xxxx] [ /img ]
This is your image with a width of 1000

.....

That's handy to know. Thanks for that!

MrTeal

legendary

Activity: 1274

Merit: 1004

Quote from: organofcorti on November 17, 2012, 11:29:58 PM

Quote from: MrTeal on November 17, 2012, 11:27:33 PM

Very interesting. Do you think you could use the width tag to resize the images to fit better on the forum?

Never used it before. Can you save me some google time and give me a quick example?

Sure, it's just [ img width=xxxx] [ /img ]
This is your image with a width of 1000

organofcorti

donator

Activity: 2058

Merit: 1007

Poor impulse control.

Quote from: MrTeal on November 17, 2012, 11:27:33 PM

Very interesting. Do you think you could use the width tag to resize the images to fit better on the forum?

Never used it before. Can you save me some google time and give me a quick example?

MrTeal

legendary

Activity: 1274

Merit: 1004

Very interesting. Do you think you could use the width tag to resize the images to fit better on the forum?

organofcorti

donator

Activity: 2058

Merit: 1007

Poor impulse control.

I just finished compiling my weekly pools statistics, and I found something quite odd - the weekly stats imply something strange happened, the simplest explanation of which was a large solominer went offline - perhaps ASICs have been tested?

Quote

Welcome, miners.

Something quite strange happened this week. The weekly average network hashrate dropped by almost two Thps. At the same time, the percentage of the network hashrate for each of the top seven pools rose significantly, in some cases reversing longstanding downward trends. The smallest of the top seven, Ozcoin is at ~ 1Thps.

In order for this to occur, some of the network hashrate went offline this week without affecting the larger pools at all, so none of it was from miners at the larger pools. As far as I can tell, the smaller pools that lost hashrate did not lose a total of ~ 2 Thps. So this loss in network hashrate must be from one or more solominers.

My suspicion is that some testing of ASICs has occurred and has now ended. Perhaps it was thought that by gradually adding hashrate no one would notice the increase, but they didn't think about gradually ending testing, hence the rapid decline. And it wouldn't be particularly noticeable if the historic charts of pool % of network hashrate were not available.

......

http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/2012/11/18th-november-weekly-pool-statistics.html

Topic: ASICs being tested now? (Read 1674 times)