Sia devs need to play the good guys for the community as everybody say and know bitmain is destroying decentralization then is nothing better than to show the whole world they hate bitmain for the business practices. Sia devs want to hide the fact they were bribed and that blog article is perfect to disguise the real purpose of that post.
So as you have believed in what is written in there then the post served its purpose hehe
Vorick isn't the good guy. "One of the reasons we started Obelisk was because we felt that coin devs in general had a very poor view into the mining world, and that the best way to understand it would be to get our hands dirty and bring a miner to market. Since starting Obelisk, we’ve learned a lot about the mining space..."
Yes, indeed. But at who's expense, I would ask? A: everyone who purchased an Obelisk miner. As Vorick mentions a few paragraphs later, "We never found *funding* for the equihash ASICs, and as a result our designs ended up on the shelf."
Vorick knew who Bitmain was before starting Obelisk. His article mentions being warned about Bitmain from the get-go. He now credits them openly about being the fastest to market but somehow I don't think this is news to anyone else. If you want to take on a Titan, one way to do that might be to sneak up on them and release a working product before the Titan has figured out who you are.
But that would require putting your own, or at least a very small group of trustworthy persons, money at risk. To get lots of other people's money (to fund his learning experience), Vorick had to publicly blog about Obelisk's aspirations. And once he did that, Bitmain took notice and beat him to market by months. All of which was foreseeable.
Vorick is still out there selling DOA 5th, and probably soon, 6th batch Obelisks, when not one has yet shipped.
Free learning experience for Vorick; expensive doorstop for customers. And zero shame about any of it.