Topic: ASKING for clarity on thread is now reason for deletion? since when? (Read 226 times)

Please no trolling or off topic. Let's stick to the trolling claim in that thread.

I must add though since you had the good manners to clear up what you meant (even thought you are wrong)  one thing is clear.

We asked for the specific examples of "trolling" and why they are "trolling" ... you seem to have failed to present it.

When people claim "trolling" but are unable to present the examples of "trolling" you know they are "trolling trolling"

"trolling trolling" is a growing cancer on this board. When people don't like the observable instances you present you are "trolling" or "threatening" or "lying" or "untrustworthy" or "insane" . Or if people can not present a rebuttal to your points then you were "trolling ".  Even when they are challenged in public and fail to present their examples /case they still repeat the same observably incorrect nonsense over and over which is actually "trolling" per board rules.

I am going to start a new thing on this board. The "trolling trolling test"

If your central point is not refuted then you are not trolling. In that specific thread our central point that hhampuz should have clear and transparent rules/thresholds for accepting and denying applicants and that all members should be measured transparently and equally against those rules/thresholds. This ensures fair consistent treatment for all members and also safeguards him and the projects from legitimate concerns regarding back handers, kick backs, colluding and market making with regard the initial distribution of new tokens.

He says NO he needs to offer no explanation for who and why he accepts or excludes people and people can say what they want about him or the projects he works for.  He seems to have only a limited understanding of the legitimate criticisms and speculations he is leaving himself and his projects open to. We are only trying to help him, his projects and the every board member here have a fair chance.

So you are the first candidate for the trolling trolling test which will be a new thread and updated with each new participant. Be grateful that you are number 1.  Produce the trolling or be cast as number 1 trolling troll on our new thread.

Now that we know your post was also deleted it seems "more" reasonable but still your first post issuing these false and off topic claims should be removed also. We were only asking for clarity on your post since we did not know who you were referring to.

You have 48hrs to produce or you become bitcointalks first TROLLING TROLL.

Here is my post from this topic that also been deleted:
Let me correct you. Your idiots gang (you, cryptohunter with all his alt accounts and some others faceless trolls) isn't everyone. You are just a small majority.

Your gang is not everyone TSHIT.You are just a small majority

It is on topic, you moan about something that everyone other than 4 members disagree with. Move on

Please keep on topic. This is specifically about asking for clarity on a vague on topic and relevant post. First warning any other off topic posts will be reported.

Here is some news for you, every single fucking post you make us off topic as you are so mentally fucking challenged you can’t seem to just move on.

Close the tab, have a wank and find a new hobby CH

If someone makes a post that is on topic and relevant ( because it is not deleted even though your reply is is DIRECT response to that and surely would have been if it was off topic and irrelevant.)
but it is a bit vague and could relate to various other posts then you are NOT allowed to ask for clarity on whom or what they are referring to.

You must apparently just guess and remain ill informed.  


1. can you tell us who the trolls are?
2. can you present examples of their trolling, and why you consider it trolling?

Just so we can understand who and what you are talking about.