Guys, these algs are NOT ASIC resistant. Mine Scrypt-N. Seriously, unless you want ASICs to happen all over again, don't do this.
I don't care about this. That would be at least a year or two away and by then better algos will be out. Scrypt-N still runs hot and uses more power so I personally don't care for it. X11 runs cool as ice and smooth as silk.
So you want to constantly hop coins? With Scrypt-N, the dev can just tweak one parameter and the coin is fine again, plus, Scrypt-N is a LOT harder to implement on an ASIC than X11.
Scrypt-N is an awful Algo. It's literally Scrypt with included N factor? Is this a joke? Scrypt-N is NOT a lot harder to implement into ASIC than x11... The only difference is a slight memory requirement, and your an idiot if you think ASIC manufacturers won't add memory to ASIC's...
Also - Scrypt-N is GPU HOSTILE!! As the N factor increases, so does memory requirement, and soon scrypt-N will be unable to be mined by cheaper GPU's with 1 gig of memory.
X11 solves all these issues, as well as saving you money from power draw, it keeps your house cool in the summer, as well as being significantly easier to tweak than scrypt-N.
Uh, first, scrypt-N is a LOT harder to implement in hardware, because it needs asstons of memory and that requirement only increases over time. Yes, if N increases too quickly, it will become GPU hostile, but that's a fuck of a lot better than ASIC friendly. Fast memory is not cheap, and saying "your an idiot" only proves that you're the retard here.
Plus, X11 mining crashes my 290X without fail.