These are not incompatible. Imagine a system where you have a 99% chance of winning $1 and a 1% chance of losing $200 and the total number of bets required is always less than 100. The house certainly has a huge edge. But the vast majority of people who use this system will win. And there can never be a "long run" because the total number of bets required by the system is always less than 100.
The bold part says it all. If the house has an edge, YOU WILL LOSE whatever betting system you use. Vast majority (99 out of 100) will win negligible amounts (1$) and 1 person will lose a big amount (200$). This will give the house a profit of 100$. Who loses this? The players. When this thing is repeated a 100 times (long run), everybody will lose (100$ each) and the house will win 10,000$ mathematically.
So yes, if there is a house edge YOU WILL EVENTUALLY LOSE.
That is what I always say.
Sooner or later you will end up in the $200 loss group, and I guess before you can win more than 200 times $1
Yes mathematically you will lose once every 100 games/bets.
PD sucks
Deposited a million times.
No winnings.
Always lose.
same i tried it, and noticed something not good, like when you are winning, and then suddently you change the size, you end up losing
i don't like it at all
i think a bot it's not good here because it follow a pattern that eventually will fail, as you need different one each time, you will end up losing