Clearly they got the tag of scaming from the start and of course proved right, come here and read before bought there token.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.55455458
It is foolish to invest in dubious projects. In the first stage i wanted to participate in their bounty but i did research after seeing the red trust in their manager's account. Which is why i didn't participate in the bounty of this project.
Topic: Avoid $BASE like the plague (read for why) (Read 106 times)
They banned me for "fud" about the audit. What is fud is they banned me for technical discussion.
The same thing is also happening with the bounty participants or anyone who was saying negatively to the project and they will be banned by the scammers. BASE project being created by the scammers. It's clearly stated on the base protocol's trust summary.
The scammer who has been running base project has scammed 10k ethereum on its old scam project called spectiv project. You should avoid dealing with this crap coin.
💯 agrreeeeeeee 👍👍👍
I am looking at reb2 rebased.fi. .... Have you thoughts on that at all?
They banned me for "fud" about the audit. What is fud is they banned me for technical discussion.
The same thing is also happening with the bounty participants or anyone who was saying negatively to the project and they will be banned by the scammers. BASE project being created by the scammers. It's clearly stated on the base protocol's trust summary.
The scammer who has been running base project has scammed 10k ethereum on its old scam project called spectiv project. You should avoid dealing with this crap coin.
Base protocol seems to be hot with dreamers so here is my experience from it.
At first I speculated and won and lost a little. While playing I started learning (how i do stuff i guess).
I found the audit of the code and it does in fact show the mint() function is "override" with a modifier (onlyControllerContract).
THAT contract is NOT immutable since it is a proxy.
That means that the proxy could be set to call a contract that abuses the mint function and dilute everyone (ie reverse rug).
I brought it up in comparison to $REB2 (reb v1 was original rebase contract back in august 2020 and had a draining bug / issue with pooling so it forked to REB2 on 12/7/2020) (https://rebased.fi for details)
They banned me for "fud" about the audit. What is fud is they banned me for technical discussion.
FYI REB2 auditS are good and it can be pooled with Balancer or Uniswap. No mint function and NO PROXY (so no injection)... NO PREMINE / PREMINT, NO crap. 160k mkt cap 💎
F u $base ... Dueces loses!
At first I speculated and won and lost a little. While playing I started learning (how i do stuff i guess).
I found the audit of the code and it does in fact show the mint() function is "override" with a modifier (onlyControllerContract).
THAT contract is NOT immutable since it is a proxy.
That means that the proxy could be set to call a contract that abuses the mint function and dilute everyone (ie reverse rug).
I brought it up in comparison to $REB2 (reb v1 was original rebase contract back in august 2020 and had a draining bug / issue with pooling so it forked to REB2 on 12/7/2020) (https://rebased.fi for details)
They banned me for "fud" about the audit. What is fud is they banned me for technical discussion.
FYI REB2 auditS are good and it can be pooled with Balancer or Uniswap. No mint function and NO PROXY (so no injection)... NO PREMINE / PREMINT, NO crap. 160k mkt cap 💎
F u $base ... Dueces loses!
Jump to: