Author

Topic: Bank to offer competitor to BTC? (Read 792 times)

hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
December 10, 2013, 04:11:20 PM
#8
Depending on how the protocol works (irreversible?) it could be a very useful mechanism to move USD and thus facilitate greater peer to peer exchange of BTC for USD.  I mean lets face it if you want to sell or buy BTC and you don't want to use an exchange, right now which is the "harder" half of the equation?  Transferring BTC or transferring USD?

That's a good point, it will make it easier to cash out of USD into BTC!
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
December 10, 2013, 04:05:31 PM
#7
I have a thought about that... 

Hahah! Ahhaha, omg hahaha. "competitor" Hahah hah, too funny. Cheesy

I share this thought  Grin
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1147
The revolution will be monetized!
December 10, 2013, 03:54:41 PM
#6
I have a thought about that... 

Hahah! Ahhaha, omg hahaha. "competitor" Hahah hah, too funny. Cheesy
member
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
December 10, 2013, 03:50:57 PM
#5
I would very much like to see a corporate-sponsored, resource-backed, pre mined cryptocurrency.

I think it would ease the transition for people who can't quite wrap their heads around gold not being necessary.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1004
December 10, 2013, 12:47:14 PM
#4
First off, it was a patent application. That's likely quite a ways from an actual product.

Second, it'll be centralized. That means they could absolutely make it something that integrates more easily into the legacy financial infrastructure, but it'll be undesirable as an asset to actually hold.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1029
December 10, 2013, 12:45:09 PM
#3
I just read this at Zero Hedge as well. If it is centralized, which I can't see JPMorgan not making it, then it is not going to take off like bitcoin. It may find some success and even be more useful than the current visa payment system on the internet, but I highly doubt it would replace an open sourced free bitcoin.
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
December 10, 2013, 12:43:10 PM
#2
Not worried.  It is a centrally controlled system, which means the trusted third party will be able to block, freeze, limit, and otherwise manipulate transactions and users.   Also it is a payment platform (one that honestly is really needed because CC are just horrible for the internet they just happen to be the only option) which means the underlying "cash" or "money" is still the heavily inflated and centrally controlled federal reserve note.

If it gains any critical mass companies like OKPay, PayPal, Dwolla, et all are far more vulnerable.  Depending on how the protocol works (irreversible?) it could be a very useful mechanism to move USD and thus facilitate greater peer to peer exchange of BTC for USD.  I mean lets face it if you want to sell or buy BTC and you don't want to use an exchange, right now which is the "harder" half of the equation?  Transferring BTC or transferring USD?
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
Carpe Diem
December 10, 2013, 12:38:59 PM
#1
Oh no - I just read an article that JPMorganChase is getting ready to unveil a competitor to BTC.  Any thoughts?  I'd be worried they will push this on everyone and say lies like BTC is unsecure etc.  As the site says if they can't beat em, join em, and then beat em.
Jump to: