Topic: Banning Male Urinals (Read 4662 times)

EVIL FEMINISTS

As a male here, I prefer urinals because of its convenience in using and touch is not needed with the urinal.

That will be an act of oppressing yourself...

I still think that the world is getting too boring, you can't to anything without opressing someone, one day, im gonna kill myself

Blame nature, it'll be glad to hear you

I wonder if the various new-age shit problems (and others) have something to do with GMOs?

My last place of work had these really cool Japanese toilets with butt squirters.  The fancy ones even had dryers, perfume sprayers, and everything else the fertile if weird Japanese mind could come up with.  I always planned to get one of those things before I die.  I'd probably make my money back on toilet paper since I don't wipe without about three loops around my hand and I keep wiping until there is no more shit-stain at all.  Often I'll just jump in the shower real quick if I can't get the shit-stain gone after using a whole roll of toilet paper.  And I don't buy that cheap stuff either.

It is bad enough that you have to pay in Europe to use a bathroom.   Equality is only good if it improves the lot of some group.   It is not an improvement when the better off group has things taken away.   Here if the urinals give way to toilets and since toilets each get their own stall while urinals use less space than stalls then there will be less units to pee in.   Then we will see long lines outside of men's bathrooms.  Too bad.

sdp

I'm getting old now so my bladder must be playing tricks on me as there's always a final spurt straight into my thong so I have to hang around for a while banging my toilet area against the wall to get it all out.

I've really gone off having dumps as well these days. Every single one is a one million wiper no matter what I do.

I think we need a toilet rethink. Maybe a hermetically sealed bubble where anything goes that's guaranteed to spit you out gleaming all over.

I prefer urinals.  I can hold my dick up so it doesn't touch the urinal cake, but when sitting on the toilet it hangs down into the water and there is not much I can do about it.

Seriously, the only time I've gotten any significant quantity of piss on the floor or on my pant leg is when sitting down and pissing while I was also taking a dump.  Piss doesn't come straight out of my cock but rather at somewhat of an upward angle which can, depending on various configurations, make it's way between the bowl rim an the toilet seat.  I'm pretty sure I'm being discriminated against and victimized by toilet makers and, by extension, society at large.

Exactly: you decide for yourself what is more comfortable for you.


 

I am male and I do not support urinals. Not because of ideology, I just tend to dribble and piss all over myself so I'd rather do that in private.

I'll put it more succinctly:  Yes, in a lot of cases the programming is distinctly 'Marxist', but that is not the end goal of the programmers.

Ironically, the programmers find Marxism even more distasteful than Capitalism but it is a useful phase and stepping stone.  The so-called 'social justice warriors' would do well to reflect on the anticipated fate of 'Marxists' when the Stalinists got done using them as tools.  (Technocrats are not Stalinists, but some principles are universal.)

To those true 'social justice warriors' (as opposed to simple trolls), you are probably in more danger than most in the coming phase.  There are universal reasons that transcend various political labels, and Bezmenov simply communicated it on one instance.  Note that the editing is not great in this little 10 minute vid about who was being neutralized and not clear initially when the subject is first mentioned:

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Iz3VjoHXLA

You wanna talk about dirty, visit any women's restroom anywhere. I think you should have to piss standing on your head because I don't like how much of a mess you make of your restrooms.

I think that this should be done the places around are really not tidy and looks so dirty due to smell all around the place that affects everyone passing through. There are some malls all around available for comfort rooms that can be use by anyone..

Do some research on "critical theory" and "The Frankfurt School", and tell me again this shared "source code" for insane liberals is not based on Marxism. I am not sure what the relation of the rest of your statement with this point is. It seems as if you are diverging off into another topic.

I don't believe so.

Marx had a progression which was ordered ... ---> capitalism ---> communism.  Brzezinski took it a step farther ... ---> capitalism ---> communism --> technocracy.  Technocracy is envisioned to have corporations basically own everything and employ technocrats who manage society.

I think that what we have here is a situation where collectivism in various forms (including Marxism) is promoted heavily.  Taught in schools, sold to various narrow interest groups such as feminist and eco-freaks as a way to achieve their goals, sold to power hungry as a way to focus their control, sold to money hungry as a way to get assets for pennies on the dollar, etc.  All of this is mostly just a stepping stone however.

I see things as a 'scissors, rock, paper' type deal:

 - Capitalism trumps Technocracy because the latter is simple slavery which will certainly degrade into something awful within a short time (and it being birthed corrupt from the get-go in fact.)

 - Communism trumps Capitalism when the distribution of wealth gets to high, and it also has the power to collectivize resources (land, minerals, etc) allowing them to be handed over to oligarchs without much fuss.

 - Technocracy trump Communism since it is more efficient and sounds good compared to the awful track record of Communism every time it has been attempted.  Technocracy is only very practical with technolgies which are only recently mature.

Anyway, I think that at the upper levels of the Globalists they see this very clearly.  They already own most of the corporations who are going to ease into place.  And the plebs are getting antsy as evidenced by such events as the occupy movement, Trump/Sanders, the troubles in EU-land, etc.  As time goes by more and more people see the regionalization, the TPP-like trade deals (run by the U.N. which is the center mass for the 'new world order' Technocracy project, and their eyes begin to open up.  The 'sweet spot' for implementation is probably very near at hand.

Urinal Hand Washing Fail
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-OYM7AhW7Q

That source code is called Marxism.

I theorize that if you decompile the binary (or a lot of the shared object libraries) of a feminist (or eco-freak or any number of other mostly left-wing crazies) you will find source code writen by globalist with a longer term agenda.  Most often it is competely undetected by the bot-like individual themselves even at fairly high levels in their organizations.

In this case what is probably happening is about survailance or 'total information awareness' and bathrooms are still kinda taboo for invasive monitoring.  I'll bet it drives the control freaks crazy.  About a day after the unisex bathroom is ready some pervy wanker will jump on the oportunity to get his rocks off.  The solution to that problem will be survailence cams and half the population or more will be begging for them.

The whole point of this debate began with the European feminazi push to feminize all men and force them to sit to pee like their penis envied lesbian sisters. Furthermore it is also about punishing men for being born with a penis. This rule effectively would force men to endure much longer lines in bathrooms just like the women have to for lack of a member. This has critical theory written all over it.

No, no, no. Banning male urinals is all about using Ban deodorant on them.

 

True enough but if you debate that point of reasoning you will invoke a fire Storm from the Extreme Left and individuals who demand that unisex bathrooms be the standard.
http://www.wral.com/-bathroom-bill-backers-rally-at-capitol/15635714/
http://globalnews.ca/video/2632198/supporters-protesters-of-controversial-bathroom-bill-hold-rallies-in-north-carolina

I can't imagine women wanting a unisex bathroom.I would think that they want their privacy. I've had females tell me that there public bathrooms are a filthy disaster. Since most of them squat they don't always have the best aim. Not to mention the used pads left in the toilet bowl. 

I don't know who told you this, but urine is fairly sterile.

  Funny!
But really should wash organ after urine for health. I don't use it. It is better to use toilet for clean but ofcourse urinals are more comfortable if you don't clean and you're willing to take risk of dissease

 


The subject of this thread is: 3rd reich feminism attacking male urinals.

I agree with it so that they are smelling bad and it is not comfortable to wash organ. By the way, urine by standing is not healthy and causes bladder an prostate disseases

this is the most ridiculous debate that i have ever heard .. i think nobody cares about male urinals in public restrooms .. everyone wants to pee and feel comfortable... some feminists must leave male urinals alone for sure..

The male urinal lets you pee from a distance and be done with it. The female urinal is a tongue with yeast infection or worse. It would be safer to wipe then sit on a toilet than climbing that contaminated pony, especially if you are drunk. You could stab your vagina. Also the female urinal is sexist. Lots of women love jeans, not skirts.

Is it me or does this female urinal just scream penis envy (in more ways than one)?

Feminists do. You are wrong and they are right.
 

I hate the design for the female urinal. You will end up having drops of urine splashing on your thighs as you pee! The closet is best for women and I do not see anything wrong with the male urinal either.

just piss on the floor

I know that gender neutral bathrooms have been on the rise lately, but banning urinals... let's just hope that they have more bathrooms lol. Urinals take up less space compared to the good ole' throne and thus can manage to fit in more in a single bathroom.

lol when women want it their way its called feminism but when men want it their way its called chauvinism. EVIL feminists

1st time I have come in this section and laughed my arse off lol. I need to hang out around these parts more often - nice picks of the urinals lol

Louis CK - Boys vs Girls
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTrCBcrFMCI

Penis envy is no laughing matter.

Absolutely not. (except for maybe the penises of the interlopers part)

Tecshare, was your post satire?

I know this sounds like a joke but... you ever watch the dynamic between a brother and a sister at a young age? I know this sounds a little weird, and I swear I don't hang out around a lot of naked children, but I have noticed when visiting friends with children on more than one occasion (as I am not a parent myself) that the little girl often has a very strange behavior of penis envy. In one case the little girl was trying to grab at her little brothers junk throwing a fit and yelling "want! I want!". I found the adamant tone in her demands quite perturbing, like she was a little tyrant in her early forms demanding the penises of the interlopers.

I think siblings of any gender are very aware of any preferential treatment, but females especially seem to DEMAND absolute equality from a very young age, even if it is unreasonable or destructive to others. I am not sure if penis envy is a symptom of a biological gender trait, or an early childhood cause of this permanent obsession with fantasy levels of absolute equality in every way, but females seem to have a very distinct obsession with this unrealistic form of equality from a very early age. Could it be perhaps that it is learned behavior impressed upon her via doting parents treating her like a princess therefore giving her this sense of entitlement, or is there something more basic and biological involved?

I know this is a bit weird, but I thought it had a very potent resonance with this topic as I think it ties in directly with female penis envy, and upon further reflection I find this is at the core of the pathology of the modern "feminist" (read female supremacist). Again I must reiterate and distinguish I am pro-equality feminism, but demanding a penis is a bit unrealistic and where I draw the line.


"The differences reflect not only the vicissitudes of gender construction and developmental changes in the mind's capacity to adapt to the demands of reality but also the fate of aggressive and narcissistic derivatives as they become entangled in conflict created by recognition of the inherent limitations of the body. The fantasies referred to by the concept "penis envy" are not constitutive of femininity; however, they reflect one approach to a defensive solution to intrapsychic dilemmas stemming from awareness of bodily and generational limits."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9029963

Cross-cultural perspectives on penis envy.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7208716
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00754604
http://www.psychforums.com/histrionic-personality/topic74778.html

Can we also stress that this is to do with Sweden.

And Sweden is very much as Julian Assange said it is.

I can't believe I'm making this joke but


Genitalia privilege

It is a thread about urinals. No one will change their life, behavior, belief or send money to help this particular subject here anyway. Enjoy your music.

Well, listening to music only makes it harder

I have been replying to you on a different thread too.

Free tip: open a tab for separate threads and refresh them separately. This is what I used to do, but now I don't need those training wheels anymore, but it is working.

Urinals? Oh yeah, sorry, I've been posting on different topics, got mixed up.

Nice Loop!

Never said there was anything wrong with femdom. If this is your cup of tea that is, good for you.

But, if there is nothing wrong with male anatomy then urinals are perfect for men.

Never said there was anything wrong

What's wrong with male anatomy?

What's with the femdom?

Yes. Progressive for some. Not for others.

This is VERY progressive!

Hmmm... then what will happen to this iconic masterpiece of dadaism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fountain_%28Duchamp%29?

walking in the opposite direction of two women carrying 2 trash bags... Once our walking path intersected one them throw the two bags at my face and said: reflex. I let the 2 bags (not heavy) fall with out reaction, the second B-tch said: you could be a gentleman a pick them up for us... and they were over 40y. That's what some of them have fallen too... nuff said.

edit: sadly it wasn't in FL.

edit2: imagine for one sec that the sex were reversed...

Hmm for some reason we have a lot of random threads
Oddly enough haven't seen a gay one here yet should see what fires that one invokes later when I got time to plan a well thought out firebomb 

As for the urinals
Damn you I'm peeing into it the old fashion way deal with your Vagina

Besides its not like they could check in on us to make sure we sat on it first 

FGM = Female Genital Mutilation

MGM = Male Genital Mutilation (more commonly referred to as 'circumcision)

It's wrong to alter a girl's sexual organ but somehow it's ok when done to boys...

Pardon my ignorance but FGM? MGM?

They're already halfway there.  According to PC Police doublethink, FGM = an outrage we must all condemn, while MGM = no worse than a haircut.   

You'll see, next they will be running on a platform of criminalizing penises.

Penises are clearly owned by an exclusive boys club. Penises are a tool of the patriarchy and must be stopped at all cost before they are used as a tool for further oppression against the only true victims in this world, woman kind.

I'm sure this is just the last piece of the puzzle before a gender utopia will dawn across the planet.

Techshare, I like your argument, but the good news is we can always pee in the woods standing up - maybe they will try and ban forests next!

Like much of modern "feminism", it is not about equality but invading male spaces and forcing submission to even the most senseless and often destructive policies all under the guise of righting the wrong of sexism. I am not sure how making men sit to pee reverses sexism, but it sure is a good method of conditioning men to be submissive and servile at the mere mention of sexism for fear of being cast as a perpetrator. As with most modern "feminist" tactics, it boils down basically to some form of social extortion, usually straight out of the work of Karl Marx.

They have female urinals as well, so how can it be sexist?

I stand corrected. Pee away ladies.

In my mind cleanness was to be taken into account in the posturing... not sitting on it... dirty...

legendary... however I am sure that with the right posture a woman can too pee in it .

WTF?

Banning male urinals is just plain stupid.  I'm not much of a fan of public toilets, most are disgusting and I don't want my wiener touching the inside of the bowl.  Of course elongated bowls eliminate the problem, but very few washrooms have them.  could you imagine the line up at sporting events because there are no urinals.

It's a lot cleanlier to piss in a urinal than to sit and pee.  Perhaps the ones that want to ban them are people who get "stage fright" or they have small wieners and they're afraid of other men noticing?

I'm gonna add this to the stupidest things I've seen in a while pile and shake my head.

You know what else is 'sexist'?

Biology.

That is technically true. So is the theory of Evolution.

Male urinals are sexist.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jr59wELgFDo