As coolcoinz said, new account is not equal to false accusation. We should rather look at the evidences provided if any, rather than the age of an account. I have also known a situation where complete newbies locate this forum through search engines when they run into troubles with casino.
I don't think it's necessary to base it on the account status here. Newbie or hero, they're the same, and when someone makes an accusation, we don't evaluate it based on the reputation of the accuser but on the evidence presented. If it appears in our minds that when someone with a higher rank and good reputation in the forum makes an accusation against a certain casino, even without enough evidence, we would already side with them, then that is not fair and not how the forum works.
We are almost saying the same thing from different points of view. It will be beneficial if we also understand the angle Yahoo is coming from. In as much as all accusations depend on the evidences provided, we should also not forget that in the ambient of the forum, reputation and trust is important. Not necessarily about the age of the accusing account here, but the reputation of the account.
I can stumble on some random accusations by newbies against BC.games, skip and move on. But if such an accusation is made by yahoo62278, I'll likely not skip. I have to read the accusation and it will take the project owners not more than 24hrs to clear their name. That's the angle yahoo is coming from.
I understand we might have different perspectives, but as forum members who deeply care for the community, we want to maintain a clean environment where fairness is promoted. I can't blame you for looking at the reputation, as there are plenty of newbies here who make accusations against certain casinos without providing evidence, more like a job to destroy the casino's reputation. In relation to the BC.game case, not every newbie who posts a scam accusation against the casino should be taken seriously, especially if they lack proof. However, at the end of the day, we should still examine the evidence and its reliability.
We, the long-standing members who have been here for years, are just a few of the gamblers who patronize casinos here. The majority are newbies who search for casinos to try. What I'm saying is, we have to give importance to any topic that needs to be discussed, as long as all the necessary information and evidence are presented, and not just dismiss it as spam or a demolition job on the reputation of a casino.
This reads like something written by an android straight from a 90s movie. In 30 seconds your employment will be terminated, thank you for your cooperation and have a nice day! 
