I can't describe the level of disappointment. I feel so used by BC. The fact that they can't take a few minutes to find some resolve for this matter makes me sad.
OP, I've got into quite a discussion today with several staffs of BC just to get to the bottom of your case with enough insight. I was told that your host has reached you and explained things, and that you've made several loss-back claims in the past, so it's suffice to say you're not unfamiliar with the system and how it works.
You're saying here that, you said and I quote, "they can't take a few minutes to find some resolve for this matter", were you saying that the explanation given by BC staffs to me is not correct? That your host did not reached you at all?
I don't really think it matter if OP got several loss back bonuses in the past, that's not the problem he has with the site. His problem is that they treat commissions as bonuses which bring your profit/loss statistic into profit -> make your eligibility to get loss-back harder unless you lose it as well and then it's just like the commission never happened.
So even if he withdraws the commission they would mark it as profit for him. Profit for him would mean it's a LOSS for the casino, and obviously paying commission is NOT a loss for a casino but actually a big profit since the commission rate is very low to begin with. SO I totally get where he is coming from. He earns them money and as a "thank you" they make it harder for him to get loss-back. Also this fake "profit" has impact on player's weekly recharge because it will make it smaller, another disadvantage for the player.
So honestly, that's not how it's supposed to be and I don't know any site which treats commissions like this. OP should just move on from BC and bring his players and his own wager to a site where commissions get treated fairly.
Umm... I have to beg to differ on whether the fact that OP made several loss-back claims in the past mattered or not. One of the things I tried to fish by pointing it out is "why now?".
Suppose BC's statement is true [this is also one of the things I tried to confirm by serving above statement] that she's made several loss-back claims in the past and we can safely assume she's familiar with the system and the calculation, so why now? Why not before? Why not on her second or third loss-back claims? Or one year ago? Or anywhere in between her first loss-back claims where she learned the true nature of BC's system and the point when she decided to raise this thread? What changed? What prompt her to give voice to her dissatisfaction?
Those said, I am in a total agreement with your suggestion about moving on.
All of the curiosity I have above, from what I can infer from my chats with BC, they've explained how things work to the OP and their feet are standing firmly, in a sense that there is nothing further that they can do to OP. So, if she's still feeling dissatisfied despite of her host's explanation and previous experiences [the other loss-back that she accepted, either willingly and gladly or simply because she can't do much so she consider it as "it is what it is"], then the best way is to move on. Take her affiliates to other casinos. Given her level and affiliate income [that hinted to the total revenue she brought to BC] it'll be BC's loss, not hers, anyway.