Another rebellion that may have been sponsored by the Secret Mining Society lodge of the US is the Ukrainian revolution. It’s common knowledge that Ukrainian insurgents have used Bitcoin network to gather funds for their activities as there are photos of Ukrainians holding signs with Bitcoin wallets’ QR-codes that said “Support the Revolution”. This situation is just begging a question: “What use did the Masons make of the revolution?”
Well, Ukraine is rather indistinguishable to major powers in every way except one: after the USSR dissolution it inherited all nuclear warheads that were stationed in its territory. Supposedly, Ukraine later disposed of all the nuclear weaponry in favor of Russia thus becoming non-nuclear state, but there is a possibility that a small stockpile of missiles was left in the country by efforts of presidents Leonid Kravchuk who suspended the transfer on March 12, 1992 and Leonid Kuchma who advocated preserving the most effective SS-24 ICBMs in Ukraine. After all, Russia is the one who would win the most out of this situation, by having multiple secret launch sites the very existence of which is unknown to NATO missile defense, so it could have agreed to such a deal.
With revolution stirring things up it would be possible to steal such warheads without anyone noticing. There are rumors of Bitcoin Masons stealing the supposedly crashed MH370 flight. There are also rumors of MH370 being stolen by some unknown terrorist to be put to use with nuclear armament on board. It doesn’t take a genius to make an obvious conclusion: these may be parts of a single Mason’s plan to attain nuclear capabilities. Quite the influence they’ve got if so.
Topic: Ben Bernanke - the grandmaster of a Mason lodge (Read 1164 times)
We all remember how Bitcoin exchange rates soared when in second half of November 2013 Federal Reserve and Ben Bernanke himself issued a pro-bitcoin statement acknowledging its innovative nature and that it’s not necessarily used just by terrorists and drug-dealers. We all know there’s no such thing as coincidence when politics are concerned and it’s even truer when we’re talking about Federal Reserve.
Yet no one seems to suspect Bernanke & co. of anything. With recent concerning news about CIA agent “killing himself” with the help of the others because of a secret supranational Bitcoin society involved, shouldn’t we assume that the biggest central bank of the world has to be related to it in some way? And who would know best and be engaged the most if not its chairman? Let’s remember what was happening in November 2013 which had pesky American authorities nosing around very much? The Syrian civil war took a turn for the worse (well, if you’re looking from USA perspective) with the government in conjunction with its allies launching long-prepared offensive on the US-funded rebels in October. But the situation reached a turning point in late November when the rebels captured towns of Bahariya, Qasimiya, Abbadah, and Deir Salman all around the capital and the biggest oil field in Syria – al-Omar – thus forcing the government to rely almost entirely on imported oil. What helped a bunch of rebels halt and repel the joint offensive of Syrian army and Hezbollah?
Well, to answer this question we may have to remember that several particular qualities of Bitcoin make it the finest choice for funding rebellions: it’s untouchable by authorities and it’s almost free to transfer even across the whole world if need be. And here’s the coincidence: Ben Bernanke utters a couple of words, the Bitcoin price skyrockets and days later a US-faithful group of rebels start to wage a successful war against superior forces. See a pattern here?
It doesn’t matter if Ben is a member of Bitcoin Society himself or just a puppet in the hands of one, whoever’s at helm killed two birds with one stone: reaching a short-term US goal of protracting its proxy war of the day by making money out of thin air and sending it to their pet rebels and a long-term goal of Bitcoin Masons by reinforcing the position of their currency in the eyes of the world.
Yet no one seems to suspect Bernanke & co. of anything. With recent concerning news about CIA agent “killing himself” with the help of the others because of a secret supranational Bitcoin society involved, shouldn’t we assume that the biggest central bank of the world has to be related to it in some way? And who would know best and be engaged the most if not its chairman? Let’s remember what was happening in November 2013 which had pesky American authorities nosing around very much? The Syrian civil war took a turn for the worse (well, if you’re looking from USA perspective) with the government in conjunction with its allies launching long-prepared offensive on the US-funded rebels in October. But the situation reached a turning point in late November when the rebels captured towns of Bahariya, Qasimiya, Abbadah, and Deir Salman all around the capital and the biggest oil field in Syria – al-Omar – thus forcing the government to rely almost entirely on imported oil. What helped a bunch of rebels halt and repel the joint offensive of Syrian army and Hezbollah?
Well, to answer this question we may have to remember that several particular qualities of Bitcoin make it the finest choice for funding rebellions: it’s untouchable by authorities and it’s almost free to transfer even across the whole world if need be. And here’s the coincidence: Ben Bernanke utters a couple of words, the Bitcoin price skyrockets and days later a US-faithful group of rebels start to wage a successful war against superior forces. See a pattern here?
It doesn’t matter if Ben is a member of Bitcoin Society himself or just a puppet in the hands of one, whoever’s at helm killed two birds with one stone: reaching a short-term US goal of protracting its proxy war of the day by making money out of thin air and sending it to their pet rebels and a long-term goal of Bitcoin Masons by reinforcing the position of their currency in the eyes of the world.
Jump to: