Author

Topic: best client for modification (Read 345 times)

staff
Activity: 3458
Merit: 6793
Just writing some code
August 01, 2016, 07:58:45 AM
#2
Both Bitcoin Core and Electrum offer a JSON-RPC interface which makes it easy to send and receive Bitcoin without relying on a third party.

Docs for Bitcoin Core RPC: https://bitcoin.org/en/developer-reference#bitcoin-core-apis
Docs for using Electrum on a website: http://docs.electrum.org/en/latest/merchant.html
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
August 01, 2016, 02:11:11 AM
#1
Dear All,

sorry for the long intro but I google a while and I do not find any satisfactory answer.

I have a website where I can send / receive bitcoin.

I used blockchain api with a wallet for processing the transactions.

However, due to the fact that in the last months blockchain changed the authentication API for processing the transactions, I was wondering if I could build my own processing system.

Due to the fact that I had some experience in java and that it is possible to export the blockchain wallet to multibit I tried this solution:

download multibit-hd
export my wallet
try to include in multibit-hd a client web service that was able to download the whole list of transactions in and out and process them.

However, I am not so skilled to code this. So here is the question:

I would like to know it there is out there a simple open source (better GPL) client in java or .net that is able to send / receive a transaction from a bitcoin address in a simple way so that I can code the client web service to automate the process as described.

In fact, I do not want third part API or services as I would like to avoid being dependent on a third party actor.

As a possible alternative if there is out there some command line client that is able to send / receive transaction from a bitcoin address by launching a simple command line with some parameters that would be great. I tried bitcoin core that seems to have some command line features but it need lots of storage capacity (80GB) that I do not have at the moment.

Thanks for any suggestion.

Paolo

Jump to: