Best projects & cryptos born in this forum usually contained non or very tiny whitepapers. Contrary, 99% of projects with shiny whitepapers have just ripped off their investors money, because the whitepaper was their product. Surely our WP has some mistakes & missing sources of information, but it's not a priority by any means.
That's just how you think, but its doesn't work here that way. White papers are considered as a source of projects overall product info and that this is the thing which most of the people would read about the project firstly. You are just trying to hide your mistakes and cover them with having a demo product which in even not acceptable anyways.
I am even not saying that you should only have a shiny Whitepaper, rather that's the exact thing you are doing here by showing your copied shiny Whitepaper to investors and ripping of there money.
Ok, Whitepaper could not be a priority for you but that just looks too much unprofessional to me. It should be a priority if you see. You have literally copied that how your costumer service would be, even what is the technology behind your project with its architecture, how your platform works and how does the value of your token affects, how the hell do you think anyone would trust you ?
Again, this is just a general whitepaper, more details regarding tokenomic structure (which is well thought) will come in a specific paper later. About customer support and technology behind, I don't see the need to show the bowels of it publicly at these stages, really. For your info, customer support is usually outsourced and we're talking to providers and technology behind is full owned and developed by Bitkings Exchange, we're not a whitelabel of any other exchange and flexible to do whatever we need.