Man, that's some high quality distortion of truth.
The Rule requires that when you advertise merchandise, you must have a reasonable basis for stating or implying that you can ship within a certain time. If you make no shipment statement, you must have a reasonable basis for believing that you can ship within 30 days. That is why direct marketers sometimes call this the "30-day Rule."
If, after taking the customer’s order, you learn that you cannot ship within the time you stated or within 30 days, you must seek the customer’s consent to the delayed shipment. If you cannot obtain the customer’s consent to the delay -- either because it is not a situation in which you are permitted to treat the customer’s silence as consent and the customer has not expressly consented to the delay, or because the customer has expressly refused to consent -- you must, without being asked, promptly refund all the money the customer paid you for the unshipped merchandise.
Source: well.. just google it.
Last I checked, they said they would ship by last December. Not sure what this complaint is in reference to; I assume it's a later purchase?
You guys should read the rule further. BFL has received customer agreement to an "indefinite delay". When you purchase a BFL product you agree to wait 2 months
or more. According to the mail order rule this is what a company must do if they ask for and receive an indefinite delay. I've pointed this out in a number of threads and people seem to ignore it.
Not only must they offer cancellations/refunds they must provide the client a statement that they have the right to cancel the order any time until the product ships. So BFL is not only doing the opposite of what they are supposed to, they are also further breaking the mail order rule by telling the client no refunds are possible. They are telling the client the exact opposite of what the FTC tells them they must tell the client.
•a statement that, if the customer agrees to the indefinite delay, the customer may cancel the order any time until you ship.
http://business.ftc.gov/documents/bus02-business-guide-mail-and-telephone-order-merchandise-ruleIt is irrelevant if or what they used the pre-order money for, it is also irrelevant what that they claim in their ToS about all sales are final, they have a legal obligation to refund customers that ask for one full stop. Anything else is clearly against FTC regulations.
People around Deadwood need to realize the difference between an investor and a customer because the law does not allow for a blend of the two just because there is some wording on a webpage!