Author

Topic: BFL ASIC Status vs. BFL Monarch Status (Read 1389 times)

hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 500
August 26, 2013, 11:58:51 AM
#8


This is a parody and protected by the 1st Amendment
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
August 26, 2013, 11:56:50 AM
#7
How far behind is it already?

FCC?

sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
August 26, 2013, 08:13:16 AM
#6
to be fair, you need to start the asic timeline from september.

...and don't forget to add a notation for when they received their official FCC approval. In two weeks was is it?
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1006
August 20, 2013, 10:08:10 AM
#5
to be fair, you need to start the asic timeline from september.
member
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
August 20, 2013, 10:05:17 AM
#4
if only this product is not pre order this will sell like hotcake. Grin
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
August 20, 2013, 10:01:53 AM
#3
Nice overview...

Makes the choice simple. Boycott.
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1003
August 20, 2013, 10:00:32 AM
#2
i dont see something new here
hero member
Activity: 1162
Merit: 500
August 20, 2013, 08:45:19 AM
#1
What we know about BFL so far:
  • BFL was late with their generation 1 miners (FPGA). Units consumed considerably more power than originally advertised.
  • BFL was (is!) way behind schedule with their generation 2 miners (ASICS). Units consumed way more power than originally advertised.

Question is: Will history repeat (a third time) for BFL?

Let's keep track of the Monarch updates - and see if the locusts descend this time (on time) Grin


Jump to: