It is important to note that Binance was caught not for improper use of money, but for failing to adhere to regulatory frameworks and norms. So, I wonder if there are clear regulatory rules, or if the SEC and other enforcement agencies prefer to regulate through litigation. When was the last time the SEC worked with congressional members to develop new policy and operational frameworks?
I am by no means justifying the SEC crackdown on Binance and other centralised platforms but from some reports, CZ knew about those laws and failed to abide by them. There are claims that he was warned by some employees but the firm refused to heed the warning. CZ has also pleaded guilty to money laundering charges which means he is not innocent. My take is that these centralised platforms can do anything to make a profit even if it will take seeking for illegal avenues to bypass regulation.
With what has happened to FTX, BITREX’s and BINANCE I can say it is a Crypto Crack-down.
FTX case and that of Binance are different. Sam Bankman-Fried mismanaged people's funds and the exchange went bankrupt. We can argue that Binance is facing persecution but the case of FTX is a case of scam.
It is a clear sign regulator don’t want crypto to succeed. Do not forget that Kraken got hit again and now they are fighting for their mission in the crypto space. If this continues it implies that the management of different exchangers will not be around in the next 4 years. They will be replaced by traditional financial professionals who will be operating this new technology in a regulated complying fashion.
I share the same view with you. Very soon exchanges will operate like normal commercial banks where all business transactions will be open to the scrutiny of concerned regulatory agencies at all time.