largest mining operation in the world
You mean this?
Topic: [BitBet] Rejected Asicminer bet (Read 1057 times)
strange how one can trust a man with the largest mining operation in the world but not with a piddly bet
yes, contact friedcat and ask exactly what hashes he is responsible for, if he is impartial in the bet.
Pseudonymous Bitcoin, remember?
i do not see the point you are trying to make
She's saying that you couldn't prove Friedcat is Friedcat.
No, I am saying that the biggest problem of Bitcoin is still unresolved (and the 100+ BTC in bounties still unawarded or even vaguely claimed). In other words, you could never know if Friedcat is betting or not, and so the "if impartial" rider sinks the whole proposal.
yes, contact friedcat and ask exactly what hashes he is responsible for, if he is impartial in the bet.
Pseudonymous Bitcoin, remember?
i do not see the point you are trying to make
She's saying that you couldn't prove Friedcat is Friedcat.
yes, contact friedcat and ask exactly what hashes he is responsible for, if he is impartial in the bet.
Pseudonymous Bitcoin, remember?
i do not see the point you are trying to make
yes, contact friedcat and ask exactly what hashes he is responsible for, if he is impartial in the bet.
Pseudonymous Bitcoin, remember?
Whoever proposed this bet:
Had a good idea but executed poorly. Basically as stated this is a bet on the contents of a webpage, might as well be something like:
Is there some way to reconstruct this bet based on objective, verifiable criteria?
Quote
ASICMiner is currently the world's largest bitcoin mining operation. Their hashrate is public and can be seen here.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AkPdXsQFT-vIdHRVUjQ5Ql9BQWR6OENLMkhyUktUblE#gid=0
The bet closes yes if their public hashrate exceeds 50 Terrahashes/second before June 1st.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AkPdXsQFT-vIdHRVUjQ5Ql9BQWR6OENLMkhyUktUblE#gid=0
The bet closes yes if their public hashrate exceeds 50 Terrahashes/second before June 1st.
Had a good idea but executed poorly. Basically as stated this is a bet on the contents of a webpage, might as well be something like:
Quote
pastebin.com/blabla says "42"
Is there some way to reconstruct this bet based on objective, verifiable criteria?
yes, contact friedcat and ask exactly what hashes he is responsible for, if he is impartial in the bet.
Whoever proposed this bet:
Had a good idea but executed poorly. Basically as stated this is a bet on the contents of a webpage, might as well be something like:
Is there some way to reconstruct this bet based on objective, verifiable criteria?
Quote
ASICMiner is currently the world's largest bitcoin mining operation. Their hashrate is public and can be seen here.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AkPdXsQFT-vIdHRVUjQ5Ql9BQWR6OENLMkhyUktUblE#gid=0
The bet closes yes if their public hashrate exceeds 50 Terrahashes/second before June 1st.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AkPdXsQFT-vIdHRVUjQ5Ql9BQWR6OENLMkhyUktUblE#gid=0
The bet closes yes if their public hashrate exceeds 50 Terrahashes/second before June 1st.
Had a good idea but executed poorly. Basically as stated this is a bet on the contents of a webpage, might as well be something like:
Quote
pastebin.com/blabla says "42"
Is there some way to reconstruct this bet based on objective, verifiable criteria?
Jump to: