I am not a fan of saving but I know it is better than spending. Bitcoin is a currency so I don't think we can spend these the same as the fiats. But the thing here is that people tend to think that it is better to save it than to spend it, which is the principle of the Least Resistance.
I am not saying spending it on things you unnecessarily need, if you will be asking how rich people spend their money, they spend this on assets. Assets that in time, give back money and also profit, investing in short. So, what is the connection of the least resistance and the spending of digital currency? Think of this.
People is thinking it is better to save this digital currency because it will be easier to wait a profit from pumps, than making a way to earn more money by spending those digital currencies. We are just like waiting for a rainbow to come after rain, but in some cases, we can make the rainbow appear, can you give some if your opinion in this?
In my opinion, unless the bitcoin has reached it's stable price, don't spend too much of it, save as much as you can, instead... there are still lots of people who aren't in bitcoins yet, so these people are going to be a huge fluctuation to bitcoin price. The actual gameplan should be - wait until bitcoin is globalized, and then spend it like a regular money.
I think for each transaction we have to take a call.
1) I can use bitcoins for this transaction. I can then buy back some bitcoins using fiat at an exchange.
2) I can use fiat for this transaction.
If we plan to hold bitcoins, both the above steps are equivalent as far as bitcoins are concerned. Now we just have to figure out which is cheaper. If somebody offers good discounts for using bitcoins, you should go for it.