Full rescan is badly slow, after almost a day (83611s into rescan) the progress indicator just got to ~0.0051.
Ouch, that's not quite my patience level. I aborted rescan for some reevaluation at block height 183388 for now. It seems the progress indicator is not based on block height here but on something else (total transaction count?).
I am a bit surprised of some Bitcoin transfers that so far showed up in this wallet, despite the well known transactions of Satoshi Nakamoto to Hal Finney. (I'm aware that the Patoshi blocks are kind of attributed by some technical evidence to likely have been mined by Satoshi himself, for details see http://satoshiblocks.info/.)
These are the exported transfers from the coinbase UTXOs that I see so far (sorry, slightly offtopic with respect to the importdescriptors issue):
"Confirmed","Date","Type","Label","Address","Amount (BTC)","ID"
"true","2010-07-23T05:17:33.000","Sent to","","1LzLve1uY7hmq71AimBEeRuHf7qEtnP4Xr","-50.00000000","d3b94dcede3cbb08c7c0fdd1889478baa5a0b482cd917f276fa07be702326385"
"true","2010-05-18T01:07:58.000","Sent to","","1H5wBiJGX43FLHWz4nzAhLfyENNmYj8uA1","-100.00000000","028ad2c836163295e4723a49dd418ee8fb55a14613b1186675f01124b60fb763"
"true","2009-04-18T17:55:19.000","Sent to","","1JuEjh9znXwqsy5RrnKqgzqY4Ldg7rnj5n","-50.00000000","ea84d39ef6f7b3b23fbf899e11a9bb18478a19413579a69f3005359da7a62c49"
"true","2009-02-02T19:21:36.000","Sent to","","18jANvQ6AuVGJnea4EhmXiAf6bHR5qKjPB","-50.00000000","4b96658d39f7fd4241442e6dc9877c8ee0fe0d82477e6014e1681d1efe052c8d"
"true","2009-02-01T17:25:12.000","Sent to","","1CHE5JRfc5mr8ZtVUP7nnsS5HC4bWcXoc6","-100.00000000","7d73200eac9b66ea105fe63378c69f5d68663f925297117ed178deaddb6fc3d5"
"true","2009-01-15T02:46:26.000","Sent to","","1DCbY2GYVaAMCBpuBNN5GVg3a47pNK1wdi","-25.00000000","d71fd2f64c0b34465b7518d240c00e83f6a5b10138a7079d1252858fe7e6b577"
"true","2009-01-12T21:04:20.000","Sent to","","1ByLSV2gLRcuqUmfdYcpPQH8Npm8cccsFg","-10.00000000","828ef3b079f9c23829c56fe86e85b4a69d9e06e5b54ea597eef5fb3ffef509fe"
"true","2009-01-12T07:34:22.000","Sent to","","13HtsYzne8xVPdGDnmJX8gHgBZerAfJGEf","-1.00000000","12b5633bad1f9c167d523ad1aa1947b2732a865bf5414eab2f9e5ae5d5c191ba"
"true","2009-01-12T07:12:16.000","Sent to","","1LzBzVqEeuQyjD2mRWHes3dgWrT9titxvq","-1.00000000","591e91f809d716912ca1d4a9295e70c3e78bab077683f79350f101da64588073"
"true","2009-01-12T07:02:13.000","Sent to","","1DUDsfc23Dv9sPMEk5RsrtfzCw5ofi5sVW","-10.00000000","a16f3ce4dd5deb92d98ef5cf8afeaf0775ebca408f708b2146c4fb42b41e14be"
"true","2009-01-12T04:30:25.000","Sent to","","1Q2TWHE3GMdB6BZKafqwxXtWAWgFt5Jvm3","-10.00000000","f4184fc596403b9d638783cf57adfe4c75c605f6356fbc91338530e9831e9e16"
I will make a new wallet with every descriptor imported with a timestamp of the block time as recorded in the blockchain for the respective coinbase transaction. I'm curious if that makes any difference for the full rescan after the import. If it turns out to be equally slow, I will throw that rescan task to a spare Raspi node.