False. Discrimination can not and should not be justified with such an excuse. It is 21st century (and we are talking about cryptocurrency for the god sake!). You can not open a restaurant with a 'No dogs, No negroes' sign on the front door just because of your ownership. It is an assault and can be prosecuted as a crime.
nobody can force them to apologize and stop asking people from the Middle East for their IDs.
.
In Poloniex case with me:
1- They didn't mentioned about their need for verification at the sign-up process. Actually I signed-up with them without any ID verification or even being asked about my citizenship etc. They just spied on me and 'discovered' my citizenship!
2- They didn't asked any ID afterwards, they just simply blocked my account and sent me an e-mail informing me about their 'No dogs, No Iranians' policy.
It is not about law, it is not about courts, it is just about the discriminative instincts and arrogance that comes with power. It is why I love bitcoin and cryptocurrency agenda: decentralization! and I believe in one specific point: we should put the "decentralized exchange" problem in high priority. Centralized exchanges are Achilles' heel for cryptocurrency ecosystem.
I agree, but unfortunately an automatic, decentralized exchange will never be able to work with fiat. It's possible to have a decentralized bitcoin-altcoin exchange, but to work with fiat you need to register a business and take responsibility. As a responsible owner you will want to control the traffic and comply with the regulations, not leave it decentralized.
Well, I do not agree with your point of view which implies some sort of reasoning behind 'complying with regulations' by 'taking responsibility' through 'controlling the traffic' of ones own site ...
... decentralized exchange will never be able to work with fiat ...
You are so wrong! From a theoretical point of view, there is no reason to consider your assertion positively.
Actually one can propose many simple protocols including gateways for automated deposit/withdrawal to/from fiat accounts with traditional banks and other payment service providers, given the escrow and dispute resolution problems have been fixed, which should be the case with any full fledged hypothetical decentralized exchange.
The only real, working factor behind the current dead-end is the intrinsic nature of power and the desire to control. Money laundering is an excuse, it is a made-up discourse invented by corrupted institutes to 'wash' their shameful instincts.
Look at the poor crazy guerillas in the Middle East and Africa, the so called 'terrorists', they have no money to wash, their whole nation's GNP is a shame, yet weapons (worth billions of dollars) is smuggling there every year and what the respected regulators and anti-money laundry institutes have done about it? Nothing! Zero! Advocates all over the world know everything about it, just ask them ... .
The recent ransomware attack, WannaCrypt, was used by mainstream media to 'attack' bitcoin ecosystem, why? Because they have no interest in the crime itself, the perpetrator (NSA), the background (multi-hole Windows operating system), ... .
They say: Forget the crime and the criminals, track the money!
But you You know what? I think they are right, bitcoin is a money laundering device (actually, bitcoin is less than perfect for this purpose, we have monero, zcash,... ) but what the heck? Why don't they get it? It is done!
Bitcoin is and remains out there for years, and anti-money-laundry agenda is going to the hell, being good or bad, being a necessary tool to control crimes or a hype to 'wash' the dirty face of power and its desire to control people, anyway, it is over!
I think we have to reconsider the whole anti-money-laundering discourse. You guys in the free world should vote against it and all should take one step forward: It is time for bypassing governmental control on trade, I believe.