"Bruce thinks it's a question of his typing skills and not his ability to read a lengthy article assessing its gist while reading and replying to myriad threads on the Internet in the course of ten minutes, with said task including some typing."
So what exactly are you accusing me of? You don't think I typed it? You are so mystified that someone could shoot holes in your utterly ignorant slander in a matter of seconds that, rather than stop to consider what a faulty base your accusation was based on you immediately jump to "oh Muh internet! No one can prove me wrong that fast! Must be foul play!" What exact foul play? I hired a researcher really fast? Someone smarter than me wrote the reply for me? I had the reply standing by on the off chance that you used it? Who knows. I'd love to hear the theory.
"Make that missing the mark by two parsecs, Captain."
First, I 100% believe you typed it. That was never in question.
Here's the timeline:You claimed to have no knowledge of X.
A person links to a site outlining X.
The site containing X was very, very long, and would take the average person several minutes to read it if they dedicated 100% of their time in completing the task.
Within 10 minutes, not only did you read about X while reading and replying to other posts and threads on this forum, you typed (an act that took the least amount of time) your assessment about X, then posted it. X being of a subject matter you're on record in not knowing anything about prior to having the article linked so that you could get up to speed at your earliest convenience, amazing the shit outta me as to how fast you got up to speed.
Somehow, you misconstrued as to what I was amazed about, with both of us now addressing this issue twice since I first presented my amazement, now taken back (translated: amazed) that you're at a lost as to what the fuck I'm talkin' 'bout. What's your qualifications again for being voted in the unpaid position you're enjoy at TBF, a voted-in position that you didn't run for?
