Author

Topic: Bitcoin is a giant digital Tally Stick (Read 2080 times)

legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1007
May 08, 2013, 08:59:32 AM
#3
I'd say Ripple fits better as the digital equivalent of the tally stick, because it rather records contracts and obligations.

(the modern equivalent to the surface irregularities as protection against forgery is today's cryptography in general I'd say.)
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1003
FAIL
newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
For you medievalists out there, I just had a thought: Bitcoin is like a giant, split tally stick, just like the ones used to record transactions in the middle ages. The Blockchain is the stock, and your Private Key is the foil.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tally_stick#Split_tally

Split tally
The split tally was a technique which became common in medieval Europe, which was constantly short of money (coins) and predominantly illiterate, in order to record bilateral exchange and debts. A stick (squared hazelwood sticks were most common) was marked with a system of notches and then split lengthwise. This way the two halves both record the same notches and each party to the transaction received one half of the marked stick as proof. Later this technique was refined in various ways and became virtually tamper proof. One of the refinements was to make the two halves of the stick of different lengths. The longer part was called stock and was given to the party which had advanced money (or other items) to the receiver. The shorter portion of the stick was called foil and was given to the party which had received the funds or goods. Using this technique each of the parties had an identifiable record of the transaction. The natural irregularities in the surfaces of the tallies where they were split would mean that only the original two halves would fit back together perfectly, and so would verify that they were matching halves of the same transaction. If one party tried to unilaterally change the value of his half of the tally stick by adding more notches, those notches would not be on the other tally stick and would be revealed as an attempted forgery. The split tally was accepted as legal proof in medieval courts and the Napoleonic Code (1804) still makes reference to the tally stick in Article 1333.[4] Along the Danube and in Switzerland the tally was still used in the 20th century in rural economies.
Jump to: