Oh and I missed OP's arguments and talking points in the torrent of posts about the energy monster.
NotATether: Most governments are dinosaurs when it comes to technology, the US government is no exception.
So based on your think tank analysis of "most governments", they don't understand bitcoin?
Maybe they don't understand it the way that I do, but they are intelligent enough to stop any potential threats to their current financial system when it pertains to online digital dollars. The internet relies on ISP's, who are regulated by government oversight - if the government wants to strangle the life out of bitcoin, that's within their realm of power - as amply shown with current AML/KYC laws. Internet service providers are more than happy to comply since they work together. Indisputable facts.
Governments learn only what they need to know for their job. That's why they figured out how to regulate cryptos and analyze output trails instead of the more technical details such as actually sending the coins to another address without using some stock wallet.
NotATether: Governments do not know the economics about cryptos and the only knowledge pertaining to them that they have is from their crypto specialists, who are more knowledgeable about how to trace crypto owners than how it actually works:
Again, underestimating and attempting to undermine the people in charge of the current system just demonstrates your lack of understanding and ignorance of the people in charge. They are alot more dangerous and in control than you realize. You are making snap judgements based on what exactly? One thing I learned is to never underestimate anyone, ever. Especially governments. You are basically telling me and the world by posting here that "most governments" don't understand economics? Sure they do, they created this flawed system we use today (by design i might add), that you still continue to be a part of and utilize.
Did I downplay their competence in studying cryptocurrencies for national security purposes? No. Did I say that most government [heads] do not know the technicalities of crypto? Yes I did. You can't expect people who think in terms of the old system, to understand the new one.
That's why they have staff positions for cryptocurrency experts and specialists.
Governments collectively might not understand the code, or how each block is determined, but they understand very well that without power or internet that bitcoin = nothing. Seriously, you are making me feel like I'm teaching astrophysics to a penguin. First let's cover some baby steps, I understand everyone learns at a different pace here so I'll go slow..
Look at you, just repeating exactly the same talking points of @LegendaryK. I already answered that in other places. How about zoning out to this board and look at all the threads on the 1st page about this subject?
Who invented the internet, and for what primary use?
The internet indeed began as a typical government program. The ARPANET, designed to share mainframe computing power and to establish a secure military communications network. You honestly believe that they didn't understand or envision the potential when they created the backbone on which your cryptos operate and where we are having this argument right now? Let's not forget about the NSA, yeah your friends that spy on all your communications and log everything you do online... You going to tell me they don't understand bitcoin either, when in fact it was one of their own mathematicians (Glenn M. Lilly) that actually created it. - search patent 6829355. My honest opinion to you, and majority of others arguing opinions based outside of logic is that you might think about spending more time researching history and facts rather than news articles that perpetuate foolish beliefs.
Once again, you are completely missing the point:
It is not the directors and managers to study the bitcoin system, but their analysts. Stop pretending the government is an all-seeing eye of Sauron, because if it were, they wouldn't have gotten into this economic mess in the first place.
NotATether: Same reason why Tesla dumped their cache - because they need hard cash for liquidity, nobody there will accept payment on Bitcoin.
- Flawed logic.
The government/federal reserve can print as much currency as they want... liquidity isn't an issue when you control the issuance of currency into the system. There is nothing to stop them from doing this at will.
If you look carefully, my logic is sound - I said that governments won't pay each other with Bitcoin which is why they desire hard cash for that. It has nothing to do with printing money and you're just going off a tangent here.
NotATether: Sure we do. Most of us own bitcoin because we believe in its economic principles. You can mock and ridicule us now, but you will be the one shaking your head when Bitcoin's price moons again and you missed out on it (for the $1 trillion market cap is the not the peak of its market adoption).
Except for the fact that I accurately predicated the exact price range and the exact time (exactly 3 days before in one instance, and then 7.5 months out from the date I uploaded it mooned, 2 x in a row with 100% success and accuracy), case and point:
https://youtu.be/eqZHzbP2Fe4Make sure to check the date of upload, compared to the bitcoin price 7.5 months from that exact date... Tell me what I missed exactly. Explain please, teach the class here...
Past performance does not predict future results. My quote demonstrates the macroeconomic trend of Bitcoin long-term, not some price target Bitcoin will hit at some date.
Still believe I don't understand bitcoin, and I don't know what I'm talking about? I was arrested by the government (a few 3 letter agencies) for my work with reverse engineering firmware and giving countless people (globally) free untraceable internet access... Also, I began mining bitcoin in 2008-2016 and am a Network Architect in distributed systems from 2001-current... What credentials do you have to be lecturing anyone about crypto's, let alone governments?
On the contrary, I believe you are maliciously misinforming people about Bitcoin, to the point where you're saying that it's going to collapse just because a few governments can't afford their electric bills (LOL). You know what, go tell them to subsidize electricity costs if you are really convinced of your conclusions.
Don't you think I'm some basement guy, on the contrary. I am a FOSS software developer. And one of the consequences of being involved in FOSS is that you will guard he collective freedom of all, jealously, from those who seek to put us in darkness after we have seen the light.
If you're out here giving people "free and unfettered internet access", then why are you here trying to gaslight their free and unfettered access to the international banking system?
Let me say that again. I am dead serious about fighting misinformation and FUD, direct to a technology that has the capacity to help people like
you, yet you close your eyes to it.
Me: I hide my gold at an undisclosed location, or in my house... Please, tell me where it is... confiscate it and it's yours. bitcoin is on a PUBLIC LEDGER... How many people know I have gold if I walk into a coin shop or buy from an individual on the street, or sell to an individual on the street? NONE.
...
This is irrelevant because the Fed doesn't seize people's gold anymore. I told you they used to seize gold in the past, and that Bitcoin in the present cannot be identified to any person (by any entity) until it reaches some KYC site like an exchange.
In other words, bask in your gold if you want, but if you can't appreciate the significance that a breakthrough form of money brings it people then that's on you.
That's not even touching on the subject of crypto-currencies already being reverse engineered (and in fact they ARE!), you think that hacks and exploits that you haven't heard about don't exist? I personally know they do because of my line of work I have seen first hand individuals and exchanges alike have their crypto wallets completely emptied! They now have NOTHING, and nobody to call to get it back!.. Still not grasping simple laymans term concepts here? You own NOTHING until it is in PHYSICAL FORM.
Please prove your gigantic theories by carrying any of the following attacks against the Bitcoin network:
- A 51% attack
- A large-scale Sybil attack
- A malleability attack (try to scramble unconfirmed transaction IDs en masse)
- A Craig Steven Wright attack (I.e. become a dickhead and sue all Bitcoin developers for BTC that doesn't belong to you, claim to own the whitepaper, try to block people from using Bitcoin Core or Bitcoin using an army of shills)
- Or everyone's favorite, an Electric attack - try to shut down all miners by coercing the utilities to do so.
The fact that not a single one of these attacks has caused significant damage to Bitcoin (if they were even attempted) is a testimony to the resilience of the Bitcoin network.
Take for example I have a girlfriend in real life, and you have a long distance girlfriend...
The good news is that Bitcoin is decentralized money and not a dating platform
Me: Lets simply ignore all those without power, and in alot of third world countries intermittent power outage and complete power failures have become more commonplace, but because you and I have electric, that must mean we all do... HAHA! Bitcoin cannot be censored?
Clearly you have never lived in one of those countries, otherwise you'd see that even with intermittent power outages my friends and I are using cryptocurrencies just fine.
Of course there are no miners here. Nobody's going to mine Bitcoin in a place with unstable power supplies.
Again, I use to be a bitcoin miner... The miners can refuse transactions for any number of reasons. If I don't want to take your transaction, I don't have to. However, if the government decides to come in and take over all the mining operations and centralize the entire project like they have been doing in various fashions, you now are at a loss for words or able to argue completely. If the government doesn't want it to take place (online), then it won't!
Mining is a zero-sum game and follows an economic game theory model, which means whoever censors transactions on their own blocks will
lose money. Other miners will happily include them with their tx fees. You should know that Marathon attempted to do exactly what you are talking about. They had to quit, because they were losing tons of money from self-inflicted sanctions. To miners, Greed > Censorship is the relation that forms one of the pillars to the network security.
Lets quickly look up how fast and frequently the governments and banks in those countries are buying physical precious metals... And lets compare to their crypto holdings.. ouch, speechless now? Gonna tell everyone the government doesn't understand or is somehow naive?
I have already explained my position in previous replies and see no benefit to repeating it herenif you're just going to distort it.
Anyone can buy gold... It's dependent on supply and demand, gold actually has real world uses and utility (intrinsic value) outside of being a monetary instrument. Bitcoin has no utility other than to store information, it has no intrinsic value.
If you believe that bitcoin was used only to store information and is "worthless", why did you mine in the first place? Surely, you yourself cannot be brainwashed, manipulated as you claim I am? I sense a certain hypocrisy in your posts.
Closed circle of adoption? Explain then how the entire world knows what it is and has sought it out since it was first discovered...
Because other forms of money did not exist back then, and in recent decades it is slowly becoming harder for the average person to buy physical gold (digital wallets with gold tokens do not count).
Please, don't waste my time again by taking up space on my computer screen with your nonsensical arguments.
You know, there is a "Close" button on the right of this browser tab, and all your pains will come to an end...
My assessment based on your level of understanding is that you suffer from what is known as "cognitive dissonance":
Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong.
When they are presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new evidence cannot be accepted.
It would create a feeling that is extremely uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance.
And because it is so important to protect the core belief, they will rationalize, ignore and even deny anything that doesn't fit in with the core belief.
That seems to describe your attitude here, wildly reflecting the debate in different angles, from declaring that governments can force all miners to shut down to your arrest to "girlfriends" to mining and then to ancient civilizations using gold and finally concluding that the person who is patiently trying to explain to you why Bitcoin is a store of value must be mentally defective.
Christ, I think I broke JayJuanGee's posting length record in the process.